Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:54:39.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rights Restoration and the Entanglement of US Criminal and Civil Law: A Study of New York's “Certificates of Relief”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Alec C. Ewald
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Despite burgeoning interest in prisoner re‐entry and the “collateral consequences” of criminal convictions, we know little about the practical operation of policies governing the rights and privileges of people with criminal convictions. This study examines New York's Certificates of Relief from Civil Disabilities to explore the workings of the US carceral state at the intersection of criminal and civil law. These certificates remove some legal restrictions accompanying convictions, particularly licensure barriers, and are easier to achieve than pardons; other states have used New York's policy as a model. Interviews with judges and probation officers reveal deep variations in how they understand and award certificates. In some cases, differences stem from informal local agreements, particularly concerning firearms in rural communities; in others, from discretionary judgments in a context of legal ambiguity. These practices demonstrate how specific legal, organizational, and cultural factors contribute to complexity and variation in the US carceral state.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , Winter 2016 , pp. 5 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Alarid, Leanne Fiftal, and del Carmen, Rolando V. 2012. Community‐Based Corrections, 9th ed. Independence, KY: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Allen, Jessie. 2012. Documentary Disenfranchisement. Tulane Law Review 86:389–464.Google Scholar
American Bar Association, Criminal Justice Standards Committee. 2004. ABA Standards for Criminal Justice, 3rd ed.: Collateral Sanctions and Discretionary Disqualification of Convicted Persons. Washington, DC: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Austin, Thomas L. 1981. The Influence of Court Location on Type of Criminal Sentence: The Rural‐Urban Factor. Journal of Criminal Justice 9:305–16.Google Scholar
Bach, Amy. 2009. Ordinary Injustice: How America Holds Court. New York: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
Baer, Judge Harold Jr. 2011. Collateral Consequences of Conviction: A Reminder of Some Possible Civil Penalties. http://www.nysba.org/uploadedFiles/NYSBA/Sections/Criminal_Justice/Records_of_Conviction/BaerCollateralConsequences‐WEB.pdf (accessed May 19, 2015).Google Scholar
Burton, Velmer S. Jr., Fisher, Colleen M., Jonson, Cheryl Lero, and Cullen, Francis T. 2014. Confronting the Collateral Consequences of a Criminal Conviction: A Special Challenge for Social Work with Offenders. Journal of Forensic Social Work 4:80–103.Google Scholar
Bushway, Shawn, Nieuwbeerta, Paul, and Blokland, Arjan. 2011. The Predictive Value of Criminal Background Checks: Do Age and Criminal History Affect Time to Redemption? Criminology 49 (1): 27–60.Google Scholar
Coalition of Advocates to Reduce Recidivism Through Employment, the Safer Foundation. 2006. Certificates of Relief from Disabilities: Implementation and Tracking. Chicago, IL: Safer Foundation.Google Scholar
Ewald, Alec C. 2012. Collateral Consequences in the American States. Social Science Quarterly 93 (1): 211–47.Google Scholar
Ewald, Alec C., and Smith, Marnie. 2008. Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions in American Courts: The View from the State Bench. Justice System Journal 29 (2): 145–65.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie. 2006. The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hagan, John. 1977. Criminal Justice in Rural and Urban Communities: A Study of the Bureaucratization of Justice. Social Forces 55 (3): 597–612.Google Scholar
Harris, Alexes. 2007. Diverting and Abdicating Judicial Discretion: Cultural, Political, and Procedural Dynamics in California Juvenile Justice. Law & Society Review 41 (2): 387–427.Google Scholar
Holzer, Harry J., Raphael, Steven, and Stoll, Michael A. 2007. The Effect of an Applicant's Criminal History on Employer Hiring Decisions and Screening Practices: Evidence from Los Angeles. In Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post‐Industrial America, 117–50. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Jacobs, James B. 2015. The Eternal Criminal Record. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Karlan, Pamela S. 2004. Convictions and Doubts: Retribution, Representation, and the Debate Over Felon Disenfranchisement. Stanford Law Review 56:1147–70.Google Scholar
Klingele, Cecelia, Roberts, Jenny, and Margaret Colgate Love. 2013. Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions: Law, Policy and Practice, 2012–2013 Ed. Eagan, MN: Thomson West.Google Scholar
Kohler‐Hausmann, Issa. 2013. Misdemeanor Justice: Control Without Conviction. American Journal of Sociology 119 (2): 351–93.Google Scholar
Lageson, Sarah Esther, Vuolo, Mike, and Uggen, Christopher. 2015. Legal Ambiguity in Managerial Assessments of Criminal Records. Law & Social Inquiry 40 (1): 175–204.Google Scholar
Legal Action Center. 2004. After Prison: Roadblocks to Reentry. New York: Legal Action Center. http://www.lac.org/roadblocks‐to‐reentry/upload/lacreport/LAC_PrintReport.pdf (accessed May 19, 2015).Google Scholar
Legal Action Center. 2006. How to Get Section 8 or Public Housing Even with a Criminal Record. New York: Legal Action Center.Google Scholar
Lerman, Amy, and Weaver, Vesla. 2010. Political Consequences of the Carceral State. American Political Science Review 104:817–33.Google Scholar
Love, Margaret Colgate. 2003. Starting Over with a Clean Slate: In Praise of a Forgotten Section of the Model Penal Code. Fordham Urban Law Journal 30:101–36.Google Scholar
Maigret, Richard P. 2002. The Federal Firearms Laws and Their Effect on Possession of Rifles and Shotguns for Lawful Sporting and Hunting Purposes. Originally published in Law and Order News, a publication of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of New York, Buffalo, NY, Nov. 13, 2002. Copy on file with the author.Google Scholar
Meredith, Marc, and Morse, Michael. Forthcoming. The Politics of the Restoration of Ex‐Felon Voting Rights: The Case of Iowa. Quarterly Journal of Political Science. Copy on file with the author.Google Scholar
Myers, Martha A., and Talarico, Susette M. 1986. Urban Justice, Rural Injustice? Urbanization and Its Effect on Sentencing. Criminology 24 (2): 367–91.Google Scholar
Natapoff, Alexandra. 2012. Misdemeanors. Southern California Law Review 85:1313–75.Google Scholar
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. 2014. Collateral Damage: America's Failure to Forgive or Forget in the War on Crime. Washington, DC: National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.Google Scholar
New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA). 2009. Applications and Tenancy Administration Manual. New York: NYCHA.Google Scholar
New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision. 2012. Certificates of Relief from Disabilities Pre‐Release, Directive #9103.01 4/05, Revised Dec. 13, 2012. Albany, NY: New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision. Copy on file with the author.Google Scholar
New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. n.d. Certificates of Relief from Disabilities and Certificates of Good Conduct—Licensure and Employment of Offenders. Albany, NY: New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. http://www.criminaljustice.ny.gov/opca/pdfs/certificatesofrelieffromforfeituresanddisabilitiesqanda.pdf (accessed May 19, 2015).Google Scholar
Owens, Michael Leo, and Smith, Adrienne R. 2012. “Deviants” and Democracy: Punitive Policy Designs and the Social Rights of Felons as Citizens. American Politics Research 40:531–67.Google Scholar
Peters, Jeremy W. 2014. G.O.P. Moving to Ease its Stance on Sentencing. New York Times, March 13.Google Scholar
Petersilia, Joan. 2002. Reforming Probation and Parole in the 21st Century. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Association.Google Scholar
Pinaire, Brian, Heumann, Milt, and Lerman, J. 2006. Barred from the Bar: The Process, Politics, and Policy Implications of Discipline for Attorney Felony Offenders. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 13:290–330.Google Scholar
Pinard, Michael M. 2004. Broadening the Holistic Mindset: Incorporating Collateral Consequences and Reentry into Criminal Defense Lawyering. Fordham Urban Law Journal 31:1067–1095.Google Scholar
Pinard, Michael M. 2014. Criminal Records, Race and Redemption. Legislation and Public Policy 16:963–97.Google Scholar
Radice, Joy. 2012. Administering Justice: Removing Statutory Bars to Re‐Entry. University of Colorado Law Review 83:715–79.Google Scholar
Roberts, Jenny. 2008. The Mythical Divide Between Collateral and Direct Consequences of Criminal Convictions: Involuntary Commitment of “Sexually Violent Predators.” Minnesota Law Review 93 (December): 670–740.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Michelle Natividad. 2015. Ban the Box: U.S. Cities, Counties, and States Adopt Fair Hiring Practices. New York: National Employment Law Project. https://www.nelp.org/publication/ban‐the‐box‐fair‐chance‐hiring‐state‐and‐local‐guide/(accessed May 19, 2015).Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Michelle Natividad, and Emsellem, Maurice. 2011. 65 Million “Need Not Apply:” The Case for Reforming Criminal Background Checks for Employment. National Employment Law Project. http://www.nelp.org/page/‐/65_Million_Need_Not_Apply.pdf?nocdn=1 (accessed May 19, 2015).Google Scholar
Schiraldi, Vincent. 2012. A Powerful Tool for Rehabilitation. New York Law Journal, November 30.Google Scholar
Shanahan, Colleen F. 2012. Significant Entanglements: A Framework for the Civil Consequences of Criminal Convictions. American Criminal Law Review 49:1387–1436.Google Scholar
Society for Human Resource Management. 2012. Background Checking: The Use of Criminal Background Checks in Hiring Decisions. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael. 2008. Learning from the Limits of Deterrence Research. Crime & Justice 37 (1): 279–311.Google Scholar
Uggen, Christopher. 2000. Work as a Turning Point in the Life Course of Criminals: A Duration Model of Age, Employment, and Recidivism. American Sociological Review 65:529–46.Google Scholar
Uggen, Christopher, Manza, Jeff, and Thompson, Melissa. 2006. Citizenship, Democracy, and the Civic Reintegration of Criminal Offenders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 605 (May): 281–310.Google Scholar
Vallas, Rebecca, and Dietrich, Sharon. 2014. One Strike and You're Out: How We Can Eliminate Barriers to Economic Security and Mobility for People with Criminal Records. Center for American Progress. https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp‐content/uploads/2014/12/VallasCriminalRecordsReport.pdf (accessed May 19, 2015).Google Scholar
von Hirsch, Andrew, and Wasik, Martin. 1997. Civil Disqualifications Attending Conviction: A Suggested Conceptual Framework. Cambridge Law Journal 56 (3): 599–626.Google Scholar
Western, Bruce. 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Logan v. United States, 552 U.S. 23 (2008).Google Scholar
State of N.Y., Dep't of State Div. of Licensing Servs. v. Kaye, 95 DOS 98 (1998).Google Scholar
United States v. Caron, 524 U.S. 308 (1998).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

An Act Concerning the Recommendations of the Connecticut Sentencing Commission with Regard to Certificates of Rehabilitation, Connecticut Public Law 14‐2n7 (2014).Google Scholar
An Act to Amend the Correction Law, in Relation to the Issuance of Certificates of Relief from Disabilities, New York Assembly (2011).Google Scholar
Laws of New York, Art. 35 (Executive), § 845‐b.Google Scholar
Laws of New York, NY Public Law § 2899.Google Scholar
NY Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, Art. 8, § 102, Subdiv. 2.Google Scholar
NY Correctional Law §§ 701(1)m702(2), 702(3), 703(3), 703‐b(1). 18 U.S.C. § 922(g).Google Scholar
Uniform Rules for New York State Trial Courts § 200.Google Scholar
Vermont Uniform Collateral Consequences of Conviction Act, HB413 (2014).Google Scholar