Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:43:26.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Racially Restrictive Covenants—Were They Dignity Takings?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Racially restrictive covenants—subdivision rules or neighborhood agreements that “run with the land” to bar sales of rentals by minority members—were common and legally enforceable in the United States in the first half of the twentieth century. In spite of their demeaning character, these racial covenants took away opportunities from excluded minorities, rather than things, and thus they amounted to something less than the dramatic “dignity takings” that Bernadette Atuahene (2014) describes in her new book on dignity takings in South Africa. In this article, I explore some significant ways in which racially restrictive covenants differed from dignity takings as Atuahene defines them, as well as the shadowy similarities between racial covenants and Atuahene's dignity takings; I focus here on the dimensions of dehumanization, state involvement, and property takings. I conclude with a discussion of remedies, particularly considering measures that restore dignity through both public policies and private actions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abrams, Charles. 1955. Forbidden Neighbors: A Study of Prejudice in Housing. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette. 2014. We Want What's Ours: Learning from South Africa's Land Restitution Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Jeannine. 2013. Hate Thy Neighbor: Move‐In Violence and the Persistence of Racial Segregation in American Housing. New York/London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, David E. 1998. Philip Sober Controlling Philip Drunk: Buchanan v. Warley in Historical Perspective. Vanderbilt Law Review 51:797880.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs‐Merrill.Google Scholar
Brooks, Richard R. W., and Rose, Carol M. 2013. Saving the Neighborhood: Racially Restrictive Covenants, Law, and Social Norms. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brophy, Alfred L. 2016. When More than Property Is Lost: The Dignitary Losses and Restoration of the Tulsa Riot of 1921. Law and Social Inquiry 41 (4): 824–32.Google Scholar
Drake, St. Claire, and Cayton, Horace. 1945. Black Metropolis: A Study of Negro Life in an American City. New York: Harcourt Brace & Co.Google Scholar
Dudziak, Mary L. 1988. Desegregation as a Cold War Imperative. Stanford Law Review 41:901–55.Google Scholar
Fogelson, Robert M. 2005. Bourgeois Nightmares: Suburbia 1870–1930. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Godsil, Rachel. 2006. Race Nuisance: The Politics of Law in the Jim Crow Era. Michigan Law Review 105:505–58.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gonda, Geoffrey David. 2015. Unjust Deeds: The Restrictive Covenant Cases and the Making of the Civil Rights Movement. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Adam. 2005. The Creation of Homeownership: How New Deal Changes in Banking Regulation Simultaneously Made Homeownership Available to Whites and Out of Reach to Blacks. Yale Law Journal 115:186226.Google Scholar
Gordon, Colin. 2008. Mapping Decline: St Louis and the Fate of the American City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Helper, Rose. 1969. Racial Policies and Practices of Real Estate Brokers. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, Kenneth T. 1985. The Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dirk. 1988. Plan to Insure Home Value Brings Chicago Racial Rift. New York Times, February 9, A18.Google Scholar
Kirby, Jack Temple. 1972. Darkness at the Dawning: Race and Reform in the Progressive South. Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippencott.Google Scholar
Litwak, Leon. 1998. Trouble in Mind: Black Southerners in the Age of Jim Crow. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Loewen, James W. 2005. Sundown Towns: A Hidden Dimension of American Racism. New York: New Press [Norton].Google Scholar
Long, Herman H., and Johnson, Charles S. 1947. People vs. Property: Race Restrictive Covenants in Housing. Nashville, TN: Fisk University Press.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1967. Property, Utility and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of “Just Compensation” Law. Harvard Law Review 80:11651258.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunnar. 1944. An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and Modern Democracy. New York/London: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, Howard. 1976. From Exclusion to Segregation: Southern Race Relations 1865–1890. Journal of American History 63:325–50.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 2000. Property and Expropriation: Themes and Variations in American Law. Utah Law Review 2000:138.Google Scholar
Sugrue, Thomas J. 1998. Crabgrass‐Roots Politics: Race, Rights, and the Reaction Against Liberalism in the Urban North, 1940–1964. Journal of American History 82 (2): 551–78.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark V. 1994. Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936–1961. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weaver, Robert C. 1948. The Negro Ghetto. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Weiss, Marc A. 1987. The Rise of the Community Builders: The American Real Estate Industry and Urban Land Planning. Washington, DC: Beard Books.Google Scholar
Williams, Lena. 1987. Racial Violence Traced in Report. New York Times, February 15, p. 29.Google Scholar
Woodward, C. Vann. 1951. The Strange Career of Jim Crow. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917).Google Scholar
City of San Antonio v. El Dorado Amusement Co., 195 S.W.3d 238 (Tex. App. San Antonio 2006, pet. denied).Google Scholar
Corrigan v. Buckley, 27l U.S. 323 (1926).Google Scholar
Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498 (1988).Google Scholar
Fairchild v. Raines, 151 P. 260 (Cal. 1944).Google Scholar
Gandolfo v. Hartman, 49 F. 181 (S.D. Cal. 1982).Google Scholar
Hansberry v. Lee, 411 U.S. 32 (1940).Google Scholar
Hurd v. Hodge, 334 U.S. 24 (1948).Google Scholar
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968).Google Scholar
Mays v. Burgess, 147 F.2d 869 (D.C. Cir. 1945).Google Scholar
Parmalee v. Morris, 188 N.W. 330 (Mich. 1922).Google Scholar
Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978).Google Scholar
Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation, 524 U.S. 156 (1988).Google Scholar
Plessy v. Ferguson, 162 U.S. 537 (1896).Google Scholar
Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co., 467 U.S. 986 (1984).Google Scholar
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).Google Scholar
United States v. Starrett City Associates, 840 F.2d 1096 (2d Cir. 1988), certiorari denied 488 U.S. 946 (1988).Google Scholar
Civil Rights Act of 1968, Public Law 90‐284; 82 Stat. 73.Google Scholar
Pima County, Arizona, Recorder of Deeds. 2013. Amending San Carlos Conditions and Restrictions CC&Rs, December 17. Sequence No. 20133510171.Google Scholar
Buchanan v. Warley, 245 U.S. 60 (1917).Google Scholar
City of San Antonio v. El Dorado Amusement Co., 195 S.W.3d 238 (Tex. App. San Antonio 2006, pet. denied).Google Scholar
Corrigan v. Buckley, 27l U.S. 323 (1926).Google Scholar
Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498 (1988).Google Scholar
Fairchild v. Raines, 151 P. 260 (Cal. 1944).Google Scholar
Gandolfo v. Hartman, 49 F. 181 (S.D. Cal. 1982).Google Scholar
Hansberry v. Lee, 411 U.S. 32 (1940).Google Scholar
Hurd v. Hodge, 334 U.S. 24 (1948).Google Scholar
Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., 392 U.S. 409 (1968).Google Scholar
Mays v. Burgess, 147 F.2d 869 (D.C. Cir. 1945).Google Scholar
Parmalee v. Morris, 188 N.W. 330 (Mich. 1922).Google Scholar
Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104 (1978).Google Scholar
Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation, 524 U.S. 156 (1988).Google Scholar
Plessy v. Ferguson, 162 U.S. 537 (1896).Google Scholar
Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co., 467 U.S. 986 (1984).Google Scholar
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).Google Scholar
United States v. Starrett City Associates, 840 F.2d 1096 (2d Cir. 1988), certiorari denied 488 U.S. 946 (1988).Google Scholar
Civil Rights Act of 1968, Public Law 90‐284; 82 Stat. 73.Google Scholar
Pima County, Arizona, Recorder of Deeds. 2013. Amending San Carlos Conditions and Restrictions CC&Rs, December 17. Sequence No. 20133510171.Google Scholar