Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-llmch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T03:42:01.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legal Consciousness and Dispute Resolution: Different Disputing Behavior at Two Similar Taxicab Companies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Elizabeth A. Hoffmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines how workers perceive the laws and rules that regulate their workplaces and how these perceptions differ depending on whether one works in an organization with a high level of worker-manager cooperation versus one with a more conventional hierarchy. Using two cab companies as examples, this article explores how these divergent organizational structures generate different grievance cultures that in turn encourage alternate understanding of available choices and appropriate means for resolving such disputes.

This work expands the current sociolegal literature on legal consciousness by focusing on formal and informal workplace grievance resolution and perceptions of workplace conflict. In exploring the critical decision making regarding grievance resolution, this article begins an important discussion about workplace empowerment and legal consciousness. This study uses qualitative methods to examine 33 open-ended interviews. The use of qualitative methods permits a vibrant dialog that illustrates the legal consciousness of the subjects, The subjects' own words reveal their comprehension of rules, regulations, and procedures as well as their individual relationships with the grievance-resolution options in their workplaces.

Type
Symposium in their Own Words: How Ordinary People Construct the Legal World
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , Summer 2003 , pp. 691 - 716
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2003 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society; The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Calhoun, Patrick S. and William, P. Smith. 1999. Integrative Bargaining: Does Gender Make a Difference International Journal of Conflict Management 10(3): 203–24.Google Scholar
Cooper, Davina. 1995. Local Government Legal Consciousness in the Shadow of Juridification. Journal of Law and Society 22(4): 506–26.Google Scholar
Davis, Fred. 1959. The Cabdriver and His Fare: Facets of a Fleeting Relationship. American Journal Sociology 65: 158–65.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, Chris, Dunn, Pamela, Brown, Helena, Lee, and David, David. 1985. Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution. Wisconsin Law Review 1985: 585–629.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Howard, S. Erlanger, and John, John. 1993. Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace. Law and Society Review 27: 497–534.Google Scholar
Engel, David M., and Frank, W. Munger. 1996. Rights, Remembrance, and the Reconciliation of Difference. Law and Society Review 30(1): 7–53.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Susan, S. Silbey. 1992. Conformity, Contestation, and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness. New England Law Review 26(731): 731–49.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Susan, S. Silbey. 1998. The Common Place of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Richard, L. Abel, and Austin, Austin. 198081. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming. Law and Society Review 15(3-4): 631–54.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law and Society Review 9: 95–127.Google Scholar
Grillo, Trina. 1991. The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women. Yale Law Journal 100: 1545–610.Google Scholar
Gwartney-Gibbs, Patricia A., and Denise, H. Lach. 1994a. Gender and Workplace Dispute Resolution: A Conceptual and Theoretical Model. Law and Society Review 28(2): 265–96.Google Scholar
Gwartney-Gibbs, Patricia A., and Denise, H. Lach. 1994b. Gender Differences in Clerical Workers' Disputes over Tasks, Interpersonal Treatment, and Emotion. Human Relations 47(6): 611–39.Google Scholar
Heckathom, Douglas D. 1997. Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations. Social Problems 44(2): 174–99.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Declines in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Elizabeth A. 1997. Access to Justice: Gender, Hierarchy, and Grievance Resolution. Paper presented at Socio-Legal Studies Association Annual Conference, Cardiff, Wales.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Elizabeth A. 2001. Confrontations and Compromise: Dispute Resolution at a Worker Cooperative Coal Mine. Law & Social Inquiry 26(3): 555–96.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Danny L. 1989. Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. New bury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria. 2000. The Intimate Connection Between Law and Politics in Everyday Life. Paper presented at Law and Society Annual Meeting, 26 May, Miami, Florida.Google Scholar
McCall, George J., and Simmons, J. L. 1969. Data Collection, Recording, and Retrieval. In Issues in Participant Observation, ed. George, J. McCall and Simmons, J. L. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. The Discourses of Mediation and the Power of Naming. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2(1): 1–36.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2000. Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment. Law and Society Review 34(4): 1056–90.Google Scholar
Onishi, Norimitsu. 1994. Taxi Panel Requires Bullet-Resistant Partitions. New York Times, 21 January, B4.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1990. “… The Law is All Over”: Power, Resistance, and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor. Journal of Law and the Humanities 2(343): 343–79.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Thomas, R. Keams. 1995. Beyond the Great Divide: Forms of Legal Scholarship and Everyday Life. In Law in Everyday Life, ed. Austin, Sarat and Thomas, R. Keams. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Stake, Robert E. 1994. Case Studies. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. Norman, K. Denzin and Yvonna, S. Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Tucker, James. 1999. The Therapeutic Corporation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Craig. 1993. Massive Cabdriver Protest of 35 Killings Snarls Traffic. New York Times, 27 October, late New York ed., B1.Google Scholar