Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-fnl2l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-22T07:51:38.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human Rights in Japanese Prisons: Reconsidering Segregation as a Disciplinary Measure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2024

Bunji Sawanobori
Bunji Sawanobori*
Affiliation:
Bunji Sawanobori is Professor of Constitutional Law at Nanzan University, Japan.
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses the legitimacy of solitary confinement in prisons in Japan, which is still used despite the spread of modern international human rights norms in the twentieth century. The article examines the disciplinary measures provided for in the Act on Penal Detention Facilities and the Treatment of Inmates and Detainees (2006), which is a revision of the Prison Law (1908), and argues that although the legal revisions appear to have been made, the discretionary power of prison wardens remains unrestrained, wardens retain decision-making power for disciplinary measures. The article then critiques this approach on two grounds: first, there is an overuse of solitary confinement (over 85%) among other means of disciplinary measures; and, second, this violates both the spirit and the provisions of the Mandela Rules. International standards are based on the idea of human dignity with the established principle that solitary confinement should be imposed only as a last resort. The article ends with practical suggestions to make a more serious move forward to comply with international standards.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , First View , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Bar Foundation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Chowdhury, Nabila Z. et al. First Diagnosis of Psychosis in the Prison: Results from a Data-linkage Study. National Library of Medicine. Published online October 14, 2019. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6854362/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correction Bureau. “Penal Institutions in Japan.” https://www.moj.go.jp/content/001314589.pdf (accessed 22 April 2023).Google Scholar
Correctional Administration Reform Council. Proposal from the Correctional Administration Reform Council (Gyō-kei Kaikaku Kaigi Teigen). Published online by the Ministry of Justice 12 December 2003. https://www.moj.go.jp/content/000001612.pdf Google Scholar
Croydon, Silvia. “Prison Law Reform in Japan: How the Bureaucracy was Held to Account over the Nagoya Prison Scandal.” The Asia-Pacific Journal Japan Focus 14, issue 5, no. 4 (2016): 1. Article ID 4863, 1 March 2016.Google Scholar
Dando, Shigemitsu. The Criminal Law of Japan: The General Article. Translated by B. J. George. Littleton, CO: F.B. Rothman, 1997.Google Scholar
FIDH - International Federation for Human Rights and Center for Prisoners’ Rights (CPR), Joint submission, 14 July 2022, https://www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/20220714_japan_upr_js_en-2.pdf.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig, and Lynch, Mona. “Regulating Prison of the Future: A Psychological Analysis of Supermax and Solitary Confinement.” New York University Review of Law & Society Change 23 (1997): 477.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. “Crime and Punishment in Contemporary Japan.” Crime and Justice 36 (2007): 371–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Elmar H. Japanese Corrections: Managing Convicted Offenders in an Orderly Society. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Kikuta, Koichi, and Kaido, Yuichi. Keimusho Kaikaku (Prison Reform). Tokyo: Nihon Hyouronsha, 2007.Google Scholar
Kikuta, Koichi. Nihon no Keimusho (Japan’s Prisons). Tokyo: Iwanami Shinsho, 2010.Google Scholar
Lawson, Carol. “Reforming Japanese Corrections: Catalysts and Conundrums.” In Who Rules Japan? Popular Participation in the Japanese Legal Process, edited by Wolff, Leon, Nottage, Luke, and Anderson, Kent, 128–63. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2015.Google Scholar
Liebling, Alison, and Maruna, Shadd. The Effects of Imprisonment. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. Annual Report of Statistics on Correction (Kyōsei Tōkei Nenpō). https://www.moj.go.jp/housei/toukei/toukei_ichiran_kousei.html Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. White Paper on Crime (Hanzai Hakusho). https://www.moj.go.jp/EN/housouken/houso_hakusho2.html Google Scholar
Oda, Hiroshi. Japanese Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawanobori, Bunji. “Reforming Administration of Prisons in Japan: Human Rights and Japanese Prison Law.” Saskatchewan Law Review 68 (2006): 143–58.Google Scholar
Sawanobori, Bunji. “Solitary Confinement in Japan: Incarceration Within Incarceration and Global Standards.” Virginia Journal of Criminal Law 7 (2019): 1–12.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter Scharff. “The Effects of Solitary Confinement on Prison Inmates: A Brief History and Review of the Literature.” Journal of Crime and Justice 34, no. 1 (2006): 441–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Committee Against Torture. “Conclusions and Recommendations of the Committee against Torture: Japan, 3 August 2007” (CAT/C/JPN/CO/1). https://www.refworld.org/docid/46cee6ac2.html Google Scholar
United Nations Committee Against Torture. “Concluding observations on the second periodic report of Japan, adopted by the Committee at its fiftieth session (6–31 May 2013), 28 June 2013” (CAT/C/JPN/CO/2). https://www.refworld.org/docid/51dfe6614.html Google Scholar
Vize, Jeff. “Torture, Forced Confessions, and Inhuman Punishments: Human Rights Abuses in the Japanese Penal System.” University of California at Los Angeles Pacific Basin Law Journal 20 (2003): 329–73.Google Scholar
Weir, Kirsten. “Alone, in ‘the hole’ Psychologists probe the mental health effects of solitary confinement.” Monitor on Psychology 43, no.5 (2012): 54.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Judgment concerning whether or not the provisions of Article 31(2) of the Prison Law and of Article 86(1) of the Prison Law Enforcement Order are in violation of Article 13 or 19 of the Constitution in cases where pre-judgment detainees’ freedom to read newspapers or books is restricted in order to maintain prison discipline and order; Judgment of the Grand Bench, dismissed, 1983.06.22 Case Number 1977 (O) 927, Reporter Minshu Vol. 37, No. 5, at 793. (Translated by The Legal Training and Research Institute of Japan, The Training and Research Institute for Court Officials, and the Supreme Court Library: http://www.courts.go.jp/app/hanrei_en/detail?id=71) (accessed on February 22, 2020).Google Scholar
Coleman, et al. v. Schwarzenegger, et al., NO. CIV S-90-0520 LKK JFM P Three-Judge Court, Plata, et al. v. Schwarzenegger, et al., NO. C01-1351, TEH Three-Judge Court, United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, August 4, 2009, Decided. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520/pdf/USCOURTS-caed-2_90-cv-00520-345.pdf Google Scholar
Tokyo District Court, December 5, 2019, case number: 2019WLJPCA12058018 (West Law Japan).Google Scholar
Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statutes Cited

Act on Penal Institutions and the Treatment of Sentenced Inmates (Act No. 50 of 2005).Google Scholar
Act on Penal Detention Facilities and the Treatment of Inmates and Detainees (Act No. 50 of 2005). https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/2796 Google Scholar
The Constitution of Japan (Constitution 1946). https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/174 Google Scholar
Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907). https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/3581 Google Scholar
Regulation for Penal Institutions and Treatment of Detainees (Order of the Ministry of Justice No. 57 of May 23, 2006). https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/3227 Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. 2015. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (the Nelson Mandela Rules). A/RES/70/175. 17 December 2015. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N15/443/41/PDF/N1544341.pdf?OpenElement Google Scholar
United Nations, Charter of the United Nations, 1945, 1 UNTS XVI. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter Google Scholar