Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:23:15.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hijacking Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Mitra Sharafi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay considers the legal strategies of comparative communities in South Asian, Middle Eastern, and US history. What does it mean for a particular group to “hijack” a body of law, taking everyone on board to an unwanted destination? The piece compares the legal strategies of the Parsi community in colonial and postcolonial India to those of the German Jewish yekke population in mandate Palestine and early independent Israel, the women's movement in India in recent decades, and Protestants in contemporary America before the 2015 Obergefell decision legalizing same-sex marriage. There are multiple ways of trying to take control of a body of law, and for multiple reasons. A group may capture a body of personal law to perpetuate its own values within the group. It may try to control a territorial legal system to impose its values on the entire population. It may work across bodies of personal law to obtain as uniform a result as possible—as if the system were a unified field, not a segmented one. Or its group members may make available their legal expertise to shore up a newly independent state's legal system. The essay suggests that taking control of a body of law does not necessarily mean hijacking it.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , Fall 2017 , pp. 1240 - 1247
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Agnes, Flavia. 2016. Personal Laws. In The Oxford Handbook of the Indian Constitution, ed. Choudhry, Sujit, Khosla, Madhav, and Bhanu Mehta, Pratap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Banaji, Jairus, ed. 2016. Fascism: Essays on Europe and India. Gurgaon: Three Essays Collective.Google Scholar
Case, Mary Anne. 2011. The Peculiar Stake U.S. Protestants Have in the Question of State Recognition of Same‐Sex Marriage. In After Secular Law, ed. Fallers Sullivan, Winnifred, Yelle, Robert A., and Taussig‐Rubbo, Mateo. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Doniger, Wendy, and Nussbaum, Martha C., eds. 2015. Pluralism and Democracy in India: Debating the Hindu Right. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi, M. K. 2004. The Law and the Lawyers. Ahmedabad: Navajivan.Google Scholar
Jadhav, Narenda. 2013. Ambedkar Speaks: 301 Seminal Speeches. Volume II: Economics, Religion and Law and Constitution. Delhi: Konark.Google Scholar
Jaffrelot, Christophe. 2015. Hindutva. In Key Concepts in Modern Indian Studies, ed. Dharampal‐Frick, Gita, Kirloskar‐Steinbach, Monika, Dwyer, Rachel, and Phalkey, Jahnavi. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, Radha. 1993. The History of Doing: An Illustrated Account of Movements for Women's Rights and Feminism in India, 1800–1990. Delhi: Zubaan.Google Scholar
Love, Erik. 2017. Islamophobia and Racism in America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mehrotra, S. R., and Patel, Dinyar, eds. 2016. Dadabhai Naoroji: Selected Private Papers. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mishra, Sangay. 2016. Desis Divided: The Political Lives of South Asian Americans. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Mody, Nawaz B., ed. 1997. Pherozeshah Mehta: Maker of Modern India. Bombay: Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2004. Using the Concept of Legal Culture. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 29:1–26.Google Scholar
Oz‐Salzberger, Fania, and Salzberger, Eli. 1998. The Secret German Sources of the Israeli Supreme Court. Israel Studies 3 (2): 159–92.Google Scholar
Sela‐Scheffy, Rakefet. 2006. Integration Through Distinction: German‐Jewish Immigrants, the Legal Profession and Patterns of Bourgeois Culture in British‐Ruled Jewish Palestine. Journal of Historical Sociology 19 (1): 34–59.Google Scholar
Sharafi, Mitra. 2015. The Changing Face of the Legal Profession. Minneapolis Star Tribune, February 16.Google Scholar
Sharafi, Mitra. Forthcoming. Parsi Legal Culture, Constitutionalism, and the Rule of Law. Edited by Nawaz B. Mody. Mumbai: K. R. Cama Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Talwalkar, Govind. 2005 . Sir Dinshaw Edulji Wacha: Gentleman Politician. In Enduring Legacy: Parsis of the 20th Century. Vol. I: Politics, Trade & Industry, ed. Mody, Nawaz B. Mumbai: NBM.Google Scholar
Hosanna‐Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch. v. EEOC. 2012. 132 S. Ct. 694.Google Scholar
Obergefell v. Hodges. 2015. 135 S. Ct. 2584.Google Scholar
Shayara Bano v. Union of India. 2017. Manu/SC/1031 (India).Google Scholar
Hosanna‐Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church & Sch. v. EEOC. 2012. 132 S. Ct. 694.Google Scholar
Obergefell v. Hodges. 2015. 135 S. Ct. 2584.Google Scholar
Shayara Bano v. Union of India. 2017. Manu/SC/1031 (India).Google Scholar