Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:44:05.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disputing Alternatives: Settlement as Science and as Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Barbara Yngvesson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Informal Dispute Resolution
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , Winter 1988 , pp. 113 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1988 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Laura Nader & Harry F. Todd, Jr., eds., The Disputing Process-Law in Ten Societies (New York: Columbia University Press, 1978); Lynn Mather & Barbara Yngvesson, Language. Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes, 15 Law & Soc'y Rev. 775 (1980–81); Barbara Yngvesson, What Is a Dispute About? The Political Interpretation of Social Control, in 2 Donald Black, ed., Toward a General Theory of Social Control (New York: Academic Press, 1982).Google Scholar

2 See, e.g., Richard L. Abel, ed., The Politics of Informal Justice (New York: Academic Press, 1982); Sally E. Merry, Defining “Success” in the Neighborhood Justice Movement, in Roman Tomasic & Malcolm M. Feeley, eds., Neighborhood Justice 172 (New York: Longman, 1982); Roman Tomasic, Mediation as an Alternative to Adjudication, in id at 215; Richard Hofrichter, Justice Centers Raise Basic Questions, in id at 193; Sally E. Merry & Susan S. Silbey, What do Plaintiffs Want! Reexamining the Concept of Dispute, 9 Justice Syst. J. 151 (1984); Christine B. Harrington, Shadow Justice (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1985).Google Scholar

3 Sally Falk Moore. Legal Liability and Evolutionary Interpretation: Some Aspects of Strict Liability, Self-Help and Collective Responsibility, in Max Gluckman, ed., The Allocation of Responsibility 57 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1972) (“Moore, Legal Liability”); Mather & Yngvesson, 15 Law & Soc'y Rev. (cited in note 1); John L. Comaroff & Simon Roberts, Rules and Processes (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981); Carter Bentley, Hermeneutics and World Construction in Maranao Disputing, 11 Am. Ethnol. 642 (1984); Carol J. Greenhouse, Looking at Culture. Looking for Rules, 17 Man 58 (1982); Carol J. Greenhouse, Praying for Justice: Faith, Order, and Community in an American Town (Ithaca: Cornell Universiry Press. 1986) (“Greenhouse. Praying”).Google Scholar

4 Greenhouse. 17 Man at 70.Google Scholar

5 Greenhouse, Praying at 30: Maureen Cam, & Kalman Kulcsar, , Thinking Disputes: An Essav on the Origins of the Dispute Industry, 16 Law & Soc'y Rev. 375 (198182).Google Scholar

6 See Greenhouse, 17 Man (cited in note 3).Google Scholar

7 See E. A. Hoebel. The Law of Primitive Man 29 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954); A. L. Epstein, The Case Method in the Field of Law, in A. L. Epstein, ed., The Craft of Social Anthropology 205 (New York: Tavistock, 1967); and Max Gluckman, The Limitations of the Case Method, 7 Law & Soc'y Rev. 61I (1973). Structural differences are typically represented by contrasting ongoing, face-to-face, “multiplex” relations with single-interest relations; tribal societies in which order is maintained by a complex network of cross-cutting ties are contrasted to nation states with formal, centralized government.Google Scholar

8 Cain, & Kulcsar, , 16 Law & Soc'y Rev. at 385.Google Scholar

9 See Gluckman, 7 Law & Soc'y Rev.: Jane F. Collier, Legal Processes, in Bernard J. Siegel, Alan R. Beak, & Stephen A. Tyler, eds., Annual Review of Anthropology 121 (Palo Alto, Cal.: Annual Reviews, 1975): June Starr & Barbara Yngvesson, Scarcity and Disputing: Zeroing-in on Compromise Decisions, 2 Am. Ethnol. 553 (1975); William L. F. Felstiner, Richard L. Abel, & Austin Sarat, The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming…, 15 Law & Soc'y Rev. 631 (1980–81); Mather & Yngvesson, 15 Law & Soc'y Rev.; Cain 6k Kulcsar, 16 Law & Soc'y Rev.; Greenhouse, 17 Man.Google Scholar

10 A. L. Epstein, ed., Contention and Dispute: Aspects of Law and Social Control in Melanesia 8 (Canberra: Australian National University, 1974).Google Scholar

11 See Max Gluckman, Politics, Law and Ritual in Tribal Society (Chicago: Aldine, 1965); Greenhouse, Praying.Google Scholar

12 Greenhouse, Praying at 114–15.Google Scholar

13 Id. at 120.Google Scholar

14 See William L. F. Felstiner, Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing, 9 Law & Soc'y Rev. 63 (1974); Sally E. Merry, Going to Court: Strategies of Dispute Management in an American Urban Neighborhood, 13 Law & Soc'y Rev. 891 (1979); Mary Pat Baumgartner, Social Control in Suburbia, in Donald Black, ed., 2, Toward a General Theory of Social Control (New York: Academic Press, 1984); David M. Engel, The Oven Bird's Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal [njuries in an American Community, 18 Law & Soc'y Rev. 101 (1984).Google Scholar

15 Felstiner, Abel & Sarat, supra note 9.Google Scholar

16 See discussion on pages 120–21.Google Scholar

17 Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison 27 (New York: Vintage Books, 1979).Google Scholar

18 See E. E. Schatrschneider. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America 71 (New York: Holt, Rinehart, Winston, 1960); and Steven Lukes, Power: A Radical View 22 (London: Macmillan Education, 1974).Google Scholar

19 Comaroff & Roberts, Rules and Processes, at 86 (cited in note 3).Google Scholar

20 See Macher, & Yngvesson, , 15 Law & Soc'y Rev. (cited in note 1).Google Scholar

21 See Richard L. Abel, A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society, 8 Law & Soc'y Rev. 217, 270–71 (1973); Boaventura de Sousa Santos, The Law of the Oppressed: The Construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada, 12 Law & Soc'y Rev. 5, 30–31 (1977); Mather & Yngvesson, 15 Law & Soc'y Rev. (cited in note 1); William M. O'Barr, Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom (New York: Academic Press, 1982).Google Scholar

22 Barbara Yngvesson, , Legal Ideology and Community Justice in the Clerk's Office, 9 Legal Stud. Forum 71 (1985); Barbara Yngvesson, Private Nuisance, Public Crime: The Clerk, the Court and the Construction of Order in a New England Town, 22 Law & Soc'y Rev. (1988) (in press).Google Scholar

23 See Sally E. Merry & Susan Silbey, Interpretive Schemes in Court and Mediation (paper presented at annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington D.C., 1987).Google Scholar

24 Sally Falk Moore. Social Facts and Fabrications: Customary Law on Kilimanjaro 1880–1980 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

25 Greenhouse, Praying at 48 (cited in note 3).Google Scholar

26 This seems to contradict their statement that litigation is the norm in this country (sups p. 121).Google Scholar

27 Roger Fisher & William Ury, Getting to Yes (Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1981).Google Scholar

28 Leigh-Wai, Doo, Dispute Settlement in Chinese-American Communities, 21 Am. J. Comp. Law 627 (1973).Google Scholar

29 See discussion at 117–18; and see Marc Calanter, , Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) About Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society, 31 UCLA L. Rev. 4 (1983).Google Scholar

30 See Merry, , 13 Law & Soc'y Rev. (cited in note 14); and Barbara Yngvesson, , Re-Examining Continuing Relations and the Law, 3 Wis. L. Rev. 623 (1985).Google Scholar

31 See Moore, , Legal Liability (cited in note 3); Mather & Yngvesson, 15 Law & Soc'y Rev (cited in note 1).Google Scholar

32 Mather, & Yngvesson, , 15 Law & Soc'y Rev.Google Scholar

33 For a discussion of these continuities, see Martin Shapiro, Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981); Barbara Yngvesson & Lynn M. Mather, Courts, Moots and the Disputing Process, in Keith Boyum & Lynn Mather, eds., Empirical Theories About Courts 51–83 (New York: Longman, 1983).Google Scholar

34 Philip Gulliver, Disputes and Negotiations: A Cross-cultural Perspective (New York: Academic Press, 1981); Mather & Yngvesson, 15 Law & Soc'y Rev. (cited in note 1); Santos, 12 Law & Soc'y Rev. (cited in note 19); Sally Engle Merry, The Social Organization of Mediation in Non-industrial Societies: Implications for Community Justice in America, in Richard Abel, ed., 2, The Politics of Informal Justice 17 (New York: Academic Press, 1982); Robert Dingwall (paper presented at annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Washington D.C., 1987).Google Scholar

35 See Moore, , Legal Liability (cited in note 3), and Mather & Yngvesson, 15 Law & Soc'y Rev. (cited in note 1).Google Scholar

36 David M. Engel, Code and Custom In a Thai Provincial Court 99 (Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1978).Google Scholar

37 Charles Taylor, Interpretation and the Sciences of Man, in Paul Rabinow and William M. Sullivan, eds., Interpretive Social Science: A Reader 44 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).Google Scholar

38 See discussion at 117–18 and note 14 supra.Google Scholar

39 See Pierre Bourdieu, Outline of a Theory of Practice 40, 170–171 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977). By “officialization” Bourdiru means the imposition of “disinterested, collective. publicly avowable, legitimate” meaning on a situation (id. at 40).Google Scholar

40 Doris Marie Provine, Judging Credentials: Nonlawyer Judges and the Politics of Professionalism 58 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986).Google Scholar

41 Id. chs. 1 & 2.Google Scholar

42 Tomasic & Feeley, Neighborhood Justice xliii (New York: Longman, 1982); and see Provine. Judging Credentials 54 (cited in note 40). See also Jerold S. Auerback, Justice Without Law! (New York: Oxford University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

43 Harrington, Shadow Justice (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1985); and see Abel, ed., The Politics of Informal Justice (New York: Academic Press, 1982); and J. M. Fitzgerald, Thinking about Law and Its Alternatives: Abel et al. and the Debate over Informal Justice, 1984 A.B.F. Res. J. 637.Google Scholar