Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-bzg56 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T05:56:06.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Sociology of Law: Legal Fields, Legal Scholarships, and Social Sciences in Europe and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Mauricio García-Villegas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article attempts to gain a better understanding of the sociology(ies) of law in a comparative perspective through a structural and comparative explanation of the American and the French legal fields. It is argued that comparative sociology of law will not be able to explain the difference among countries, scholars, movements, and schools of thought in short, it will not be able to compare—as long as it avoids the analysis of some social and cultural presuppositions related to the context in which these differences take place. It focuses mainly on two of these presuppositions. First, legal fields, with their history, their internal structure, and their power relations, and second the type of relation between the legal field and the state. The empirical examination provided in this article explicitly seeks to offer insights for the reconstruction of Bourdieu's structural theory of the legal field.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , Spring 2006 , pp. 343 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abel, Richard. 1995. The Law and Society Reader. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce A. 1984. Reconstructing American Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey. 1987. Twenty Lectures. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry. 1979. El Estado Absolutista. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.Google Scholar
Andrini, Simona, André-Jean, Arnaud. 1995. Jean Carbonnier, Renato Treves et la Sociologie du Droit. Archéologie d'une discipline. Paris: L.G.D.J.Google Scholar
Arnaud, André-Jean. 1975. Les juristes face a la société. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Arnaud, André-Jean. 1998. Le droit trahi par la sociologie, Recherche et travaux du R&DS. Paris: L.G.D.J.Google Scholar
Arnaud, André-Jean, and Dulce, Fariñas, Jose, Maria. 1998. Introduction à l'analyse sociologique des systèmes juridiques. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Assier-Andreu, Louis. 1996. Le droit dans les sciences humaines. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Bancaud, Alain, and Dezalay, Yves. 1984. La sociologie juridique comme enjeu social et professionnel. Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques 12:1–29.Google Scholar
Becker, Carl-Heinrich. 1925. Vom Wesen der deutschen Universitat. Leipzig: Verlag Quelle und Meyer.Google Scholar
Bixio, Andre. 1994. Sociología del diritto. Guida alla laurea in Scienze Politiche. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Blum, Léon. 1965. L'Oeuvre de Léon Blum. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Bouglé, C. 1906. L'Esprit nouveau de la science du droit. Revue Bleue 589.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986a. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hastings Law Journal 38 (5):814–53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986b. La force du droit; éléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 64:3–19.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Les juristes, gardiens de l'hypocrésie collective. In Normes juridiques et régulation sociale, eds. Chazel, F. and Commaille, J. Paris: L.D.G.J.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. The State Nobility. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Wacquant, Loic J. D. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bowen, John, and Bentaboulet, Martine. 2002. On the Institutionalization of the “Human and Social Science” in France. Anthropological Quarterly 75 (3):537–55.Google Scholar
Brunetière, F. 1897. Dans l'Est américain. Revue des deux mondes 92–23.Google Scholar
Capitant, Henri. 1898. Introduction à l’étude du droit civi—Notions générales. Paris: Pédone.Google Scholar
Charle, Christophe. 2003. Les références étrangères des universitaires. Essai de comparaison entre la France et l'Allemagne. 1870–1970. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 148:8–19.Google Scholar
Chevallier, Jacques. 1993. Les interprètes du droit, la doctrine juridique. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Chevallier, Jacques. 1997. La fin des écoles? Revue du droit publique 113:679–700.Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix S. 1937. Book Review (Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law) By Ehrlich. Illinois Law Review 31:1128–34.Google Scholar
Commaille, Jacques. 1983. The Law and Science: Dialectics Between the Prince and the Maidservant. Law and Policy 10 (2/ 3):253–65.Google Scholar
Commaille, Jacques. 1989. La sociologie du droit en France. Les ambiguïtés d'une spécialisation. Sociologia del Diritto 16 (2):19.Google Scholar
Commaille, Jacques. 2003. Droit et politique. In Dictionnaire de la culture juridique, eds. Alland, D. and Rials, S. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Commaille, Jacques, and Perrin, Jean François. 1985. Le modèle de Janus de la sociologie du droit. Droit et société 1:95–113.Google Scholar
Cuin, Charles-Henri, and Gresle, François. 2002. Histoire de la Sociologie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1972. Law Faculties and the German Upper Class. In Sociology of Law, ed. Aubert, V. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Demogue, René. 1911. Les notions fondamentales de droit privé. Paris: La Mémoire du droit.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves. 1983. La production doctrinale comme objet et terrain de luttes politiques et professionnelles. In La doctrine juridique. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves. 1993. La production doctrinale comme objet et terrain de luttes politiques et professionnelles. In La doctrine juridique. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves. 1997. Review: Les avocats. Entre l'Etat, le public et le marche, XIIIe–XXe Siècle (de Lucien Karpik). Sociologie du travail 1:68–71.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, Austin, Sarat, and Silbey, Susan. 1989. D'une démarche contestataire a un savoir méritocratique. Eléments pour une histoire sociale de la sociologie juridique Américaine. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 78–79:90.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, David, Trubek. 1997. La reestructuración global y el derecho. Pensamiento Jurídico 1:5–41.Google Scholar
Donzelot, J. 1994. 1994. L'Invention du social. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Dufour, A. 1974. Droit et langage dans l’école historique du droit. Archives de Philosophie du Droit 19:115–80.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. 1889. Le droit constitutionnel et la sociologie. Revue Internationale de l'enseignement 28:484–505.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon. 1922. Le droit social, le droit individuel et les transformations de l'Etat. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Duguit, Léon, et al. 1916. Modern French Legal Philosophy. Vol. VII. Edited by M. L. P. Series. Boston: Boston Book Co.Google Scholar
Dulong, D. 1997. Moderniser la politique. Aux origines de la Vème république. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1993. La division du travail social. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil. 1995. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald M. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Eugen. 1922. The Sociology of Law. Harvard Law Review 36 (2):94–109.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1986. El proceso de la civilización. Investigaciones psicogenéticas y sociogenéticas. México: FCE.Google Scholar
Ewald, François. 1986. L’État providence. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Vincenzo. 1990. Developing Sociology of Law. A world-wide Documentary Enquiry. Milano: Giuffre.Google Scholar
Fioravanti, Maurizio. 1999. Constituzione. Bologne: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1971. L'Ordre du discours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
François, Bastien. 1996. Naissance d'une constitution. Paris: Presse de Science Po.Google Scholar
François, Bastien. 2002. Droit constitutionnel et/ou institutions politiques. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence. 1989. Sociology of Law and Legal History. Sociologia del Diritto 16 (2):7–17.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1985. The Legal Malaise, or Justice Observed. Law and Society Review 19:537.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1995. Why the “Haves” Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. In Abel 1995.Google Scholar
Garapon, A. 1996. Le gardien des promesses. Justice et démocratie. Paris: O Jacob.Google Scholar
Garcia-Villegas, Mauricio. 2004. On Bourdieu's Legal Thought, Droit et Société 56–57:57–77.Google Scholar
Garcia-Villegas, Mauricio. Symbolic Power Without Symbolic Violence? Critical Comments on Legal Consciousness Studies. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 16:363–93.Google Scholar
Gardner, James. 1980. Legal Imperialism. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant, and Sterling, Joyce. 1998. From Legal Realism to Law and Society. Reshaping Law for the Last stages of the Social Activist State. Law and Society Review 22 (2):409–71.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant, and Dezalay, Yves. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, Jean-Louis. 1994. Quand les avocats forment les juristes et la doctrine. Droits 20:31–41.Google Scholar
Gény, François. 1899. Méthode d'interprétation et sources en droit privé positif. Paris: A. Chevalier-Marescq.Google Scholar
Glenn, Patrick. 1997. Les trois crises de la Common Law. In Droit de la Crise: crise du droit? Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Gurvitch, George. 1931. L'idée du droit social; Notion et système du droit social: Histoire doctrinale depuis le XVIII siècle jusqu’à la fin du XIX siècle. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1970. El cielo de los conceptos de Ihering y la jurisprudencia analítica moderna [Ihering's Heaven of Concepts and Modern Analytical Jurisprudence]. In El ámbito de lo jurídico, eds. Pompeu, C. and Moreso, J. J. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1983. American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream. In Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hauriou, Maurice. 1910. Principes du droit publique. Paris: Larose et Ténin.Google Scholar
Herget, James, and Wallace, Stephen. 1987. The German Free Law Movement as the Source of American Legal Realism. Virginia Law Review 73 (2):399–455.Google Scholar
Herrera, Carlos Miguel. 2003a. Droit et gauche. Saint-Nicolas, Québec: La Presse de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Herrera, Carlos Miguel. 2003b. Par le droit, au-delà du droit. Textes sur le socialisme juridique. Paris: Éditions Kimé.Google Scholar
Herrera, Carlos Miguel. ed. 2003c. Les juristes face au politique. Le droit, la gauche, la doctrine sous la III République. Paris: Éditions Kimé.Google Scholar
Hespanha. 2005. Cultura Jurídica Européia. Síntese de um Milênio. Florianópolis, Brasil: Fundaçao José Arthur Boiteux.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver W. 1897. The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review 10:457.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan. 1978. The Sociological Movement in Law. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hurst, Willard. 1956. Law and the Conditions of Freedom in the Nineteenth Century United States. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Ihering, Rudolf. 1901. L'Evolution du droit. Paris: Chevalier Merescq.Google Scholar
Israel, Liora, and Mouralis, Guillaume. 2005. Les magistrats, le droit positif et la morale. Usages sociaux du naturalisme et du positivisme juridique dans la France de Vichy et en Allemagne depuis 1845. In Sur le porté social du droit, eds. Israel, L., Sacriste, G., Vauchez, A., and Willemez, L. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Jaurès, Jean. 1964. L'esprit du socialisme. Discours à la jeunesse. Paris: Gonthier.Google Scholar
Jaurès, Jean. 1972. Histoire socialiste de la Révolution Française. Paris: Éditions sociales.Google Scholar
Jellinek, George. 1911. L’état moderne et son droit. Paris: Giard et Brière.Google Scholar
Jestaz, Philippe, and Jamin, Christophe. 2004. La Docrine. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Josserand, Louis. 1927. De l'esprit des droits et de leur relativité. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1996. Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven, CT, London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Karpik, Lucien. 1995. Les avocats. Entre l'Etat, le public et le marché. XIIIe–XXe siècle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Kelman, Mark. 1987. A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1997. Théorie générale du droit et de l’État. Bruxelles: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 2003. Two Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850–1968. Suffolk University Law Review 36:631.Google Scholar
Lambert, Edouard. 1928. Études de droit commun législatif. La fonction du droit civil comparé. Paris: Giard briere.Google Scholar
Lasalle, F. 1964. ¿Qué es una constitución? Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Lasalle, F. 1987. Meine Assisen-Rede. In Reden und Schriften. Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
Lascoumes, Pierre. 1991. Le Droit comme Science Sociale. La place de E. Durkheim dans les débats entre juristes et sociologues a la Charnière des deux dernières siècles. In Normes juridiques et régulation sociale, ed. Commaille, J. Paris: L.G.D.J.Google Scholar
Ledford, Kenneth F. 1996. From general estate to special interest: German lawyers 1878–1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Legrand, Pierre. 1999. Le droit comparé. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
Lévy, Emmanuel. 1909. Capital et travail. Paris: Cahiers du Socialism.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl. 1930. A Realistic Jurisprudence. The Next Step. Columbia Law Review 30:431.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl. 1994. Una Teoría del derecho realista: el siguiente paso (A Realistic Jurisprudence: The Next Step). In El ámbito de lo jurídico, eds. Pompeu, C. and Moreso, J. J. Barcelona: Crítica.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1946. The Second Treatise of Civil Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration. Oxford: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
López, Diego. 2001. Comparative Jurisprudence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1983. Sistema jurídico y dogmática jurídica. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael, and Dezalay, Yves. 2002. The Power of the Legal Fiel. In An Introduction to Law and Social Theory, eds. Banakar, R. and Travers, M. Oxford, Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Marchis, L. 1914. Une visite aux universités du centre des États Unis. Revue Internationale de l'enseignement 68:7.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. 1988. The Rhetoric of Law and Economics, Michigan L. Rev. 86:752–67.Google Scholar
Menger, Anton. 1899. The Right to the Whole Produce of Labour; the Origin and Development of the Theory of Labour's Claim to the Whole Product of Industry. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. 1975. Legal Education There and Here: A Comparison. Stanford Llaw Review 27 (3):859–78.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry Clark, David S., and Haley, John O. 1994. The Civil Law Tradition: Europe, Latin America, and East Asia. Charlottesville, VA: Michie Co.Google Scholar
Milet, Marc. 2000. Les professeurs de droits citoyens. In Entre ordre juridique et espace public, contribution à l’étude des interactions entre les débats et les engagements des juristes français (1914–1995). Paris: Paris II.Google Scholar
Minda, Gary. 1995. Postmodern Legal Movements. Law and Jurisprudence at Century's End. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mouly, C., and Atias, A. 1993. Faculty Recruitment in France. The American Journal of Comparative Law 41 (3):401–11.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank. 1998. Mapping Law and Society. In Crossing Boundaries. Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research, eds. Sarat, A., et al. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1983. Pound and Ehrlich on the Living Law. Paper presented in the Fourth Conference on Legal and Social Philosophy, Helsinki, September 22, 1983.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1984. Law in Action or Living Law? Back to the beginning in Sociology of Law. Legal Studies 4 (1):157–75.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. ed. 2001. Adapting Legal Cultures. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2002. Comparative Sociology of Law. In An Introduction to Law and Social Theory. Oxford, Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Odorisio, Roberto, Celoria, Maria Cristina, Petrella, Dino Greco, and Pulitano, Domenico. 1970. Valori socio-culturalli della giurisprudenza. Bari, Italy: Laterza.Google Scholar
Oliveira, Luciano. 1991. Images de la démocratie. Droit de l'Homme et pensée politique de gauche au Brésil, Sociologie politique. Paris: École des Hautes Etudes en Science Sociales (EHESS).Google Scholar
Ost, François, and Van de Kerchove, Michel. 1978. Possibilité et limite de la science du droit. Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques 1:11–39.Google Scholar
Ost, François, and Van de Kerchove, Michel. 1987. Jalons pour une Théorie Critique du Droit. Brussels: Facultés Universitaires de Saint Louis.Google Scholar
Pashukanis, Evgeny. 1978. Law and Marxism: A General Theory. London: Ink Links.Google Scholar
Passeron, Jean Claude. 1992. Le raisonnement sociologique. Condé-sur-Noireau, France: Nathan.Google Scholar
Pécaut, Daniel. 1996. La Sociologie à la VIe section. In Une école pour les sciences sociales. In Une école pour les sciences sociales, eds. Revel, J. and Wachtel, N. Paris: Éditions du CERF.Google Scholar
Peller, Gary. 1985. The Metaphysics of American Law. California Law Review 73:1152–290.Google Scholar
Planiol, Marcel. 1899. Traitéélémentaire de droit civil. Paris: L.G.D.J.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1975. An Economic Approach to Law. Texas Law Review 53:757.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1995. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Pres.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. 1904. A New School of Jurist. U. Neb. Stud. 4:249.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. 1908. Mechanical Jurisprudence. Columbia Law Review 8:605–23.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. 1927. Sociology and Law. In The Social Sciences and Their Interrelations, eds. Ogburn, William Fielding and Goldenweiser, Alexander. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Pound, Roscoe. 1967. Interpretations of Legal History. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Raiser, Thomas. 1999. Das Lebende Recht. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
Reimann, Mathias, ed. 1993. The Reception of Continental Ideas in the Common Law World. 1820–1920. Berlin: Duncker and Humbolt.Google Scholar
Riesenfeld, Stefan. 1937. A Comparison of Continental and American Education. Michigan Law Review 36 (1):31–55.Google Scholar
Robespierre, Maximilien. 1970. Oeuvres. New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
Robinson, Edward. 1934. Law—An Unscientific Science. Yale Law Journal 44:235–67.Google Scholar
Rochefoucauld, François de la. 1992. Maximes. Paris: Bordas.Google Scholar
Rohl, Klaus F. 1990. Sociology of Law in West Germany in the Eighties. In Developing Sociology of Law. A world-wide Documentary Enquiry. Milano: Giuffre.Google Scholar
Rojas, Fernando. 1989. Comparación entre las tendencias de los servicios legales en Norteamérica, Europa y América Latina. Segunda Parte. El Otro Derecho 2:7–18.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre, Furet, François, and Juillard, Jacques. 1988. Malaise dans la représentation. In La République du centre. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1975. Du Contrat Social—III Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Gallimard (La Pleiade).Google Scholar
Sabine, George. 1961. History of Political Thought. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wiston.Google Scholar
Saleilles, Raymond. 1904. Méthode historique et questions sociales. Paper read at Atti del congresso internazionale de scienze storiche. Rome.Google Scholar
Saleilles, Raymond. 1911. Droit civil et droit comparé. Revue Interdisciplinaire d'Enseignement 61:5.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1977. The Law of the Oppressed; The Construction and Reproduction of Legality in Pasargada Law. Law & Society Review 12:5–125.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1991. Estado, derecho y luchas sociales. Bogotá: ILSA.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1995. Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 2004. Vitality amidst Fragmentation: On the Emergence of Postrealist Law and Society Scholarship. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. Sarat, A. Malden, MA Oxford, Carlton, Australia: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Silbey, Susan. 1988. The Pull of the Policy Audience. Law and Policy 10 (2–3):97–166.Google Scholar
Savigny, Frederich Karl Von. 1815. Über den Zweck dieser Zeitscrift. In Thibaut und Savigny. Ihre programmatischen Schriften. Munich: Verlag Franz Vahlen.Google Scholar
Savigny, Frederich Karl Von. 2003. Essence et valeur des universités allemandes. Revue d'histoire des facultés de droit et de science juridique 23:173–95.Google Scholar
Scelle, Georges. 1929. Droit Ouvrier. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions. A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Somers, Margaret. 1980. The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry, Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (2):174–97.Google Scholar
Serverin, Evelyne. 1985. De la jurisprudence en droit privé: théorie d'une pratique. Paris: Presse Universitaire de Lyon.Google Scholar
Serverin, Evelyne. 2000. Sociologie du droit. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. 1995. Managing Legal Uncertainty: Elite Lawyers in the New Deal. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Sicart, Gilles. 2000. La doctrine publiciste Française a l'Epreuve des années 1930. Paris: Université Panthéon—Assas (Paris II).Google Scholar
Soubiran-Paillet, Francine. 1994. Quelles voix(es) pour la sociologie du droit en France aujourd'hui? Genèse 15:142–53.Google Scholar
Soubiran-Paillet, Francine. 2000. Juristes et sociologues français d'après guerre: une rencontre sans lendemain. Genèse 41:125–42.Google Scholar
Summers, Robert. 1982. Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, Eric. 1994. Integración de la base de datos europea: Servicios de infraestructura y necesidad de integración. Revista Internacional de Ciencias Sociales 142:569–85.Google Scholar
Thernborn, Goran. 1992. Routes to/through Modernity. Paper presented at the Theory, Culture and Society 10th Anniversary Conference, Seven Spring Mountain Resort, PA, August 6–19, 1992.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1993. European Revolutions 1492–1992. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis. 1980. La revolución en América. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher. 2000. Framing the Field of Law's Disciplinary Encounters: A Historical Narrative. Law and Society Review 34 (4):911–72.Google Scholar
Travers, Max. 2001. Sociology of law in Britain. The American Sociologist Summer:26–40.Google Scholar
Treves, Renato, , J. F. and Van Loon, Glastra, eds. 1968. Norms and Actions. National Reports on Sociology of Law. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Treviño, A. Javier. 2001. The Sociology of Law in Global Perspective. The American Sociologist 32 (2):5–9.Google Scholar
Treviño, A. Javier. 1996. The Sociology of Law. Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Troper, M., and Michaut, F., eds. 1997. L'enseignement de la philosophie du droit. Brussels: Bruylant-L.G.D.J.Google Scholar
Trubek, David. 1990. Back to the Future: The Short, Happy Life of the Law and Society Movement. Florida State University Law Review 18:4–68.Google Scholar
Trubek, David, and Galanter, Mark. 1974. Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflexions on the Crisis in the Law and Development in the United States. Wisconsin Law Review 4:1062.Google Scholar
Trubek, David, Dezalay, Yves, Ruchanan, Ruth, and Davis, John. 1994. Global Restructuring and the Law: Studies of the Internationalization of Legal Fields and the Creation of Transnational Arenas. Case Western Law Review 44:407–98.Google Scholar
Tunc, André. 1994. L'importance de la doctrine dans le droit des Etats-Unis. Droits 20:75–84.Google Scholar
Twining, William. 1985. Talk About Realism, New York University Law Review 60:329.Google Scholar
Uprimny, Rodrigo, and Villegas, Mauricio García. 2003. Tribunal Constitucional e emancipaçao social na Colombia. In Democratizar a Democracia. Os Caminhos da Democracia participativa, ed. Sousa, S. Boaventura de. Porto, Portugal: Afrontamanto.Google Scholar
Van Caenegem, R. C. 1987. Judges, Legislators and Professors: Chapters in European Legal History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Houtte, J. 1986. La sociologie du droit ou les limites d'une science. Droit et société 3:217–35.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine. 2001. Entre droit et sciences sociales. Retour sur l'histoire du mouvement Law and Society. Genèse 45:134–49.Google Scholar
Vogt, Paul. 1983. Obligation and Right: The Durkheimians and the Sociology of Law. In The sociological Domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Von Humbolt, Wilhelm. 1979. Sur l'organization interne et externe des établissements scientifiques supérieurs à Berlin. In Philosophie de l'Université, ed. Ferry, A. R. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1906. The relations of the Rural Community to Other Branches of Social Science. In Congress of Arts and Social Science; Universal Exposition, St. Louis, ed. Rogers, H. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.Google Scholar
Wolkmer, Antonio Carlos. 1994. Pluralismo juridico. Fundamentos de una nova cultura no direito. Sao Pablo: Alfa-Omega.Google Scholar
Wolkmer, Antonio Carlos. 1995. Introducao ao Pensamento Juridico Critico. Sao Pablo: Academica.Google Scholar
Zweigert, Konrad, Kotz, Hein. 1998. Introdution to Comparative Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar