Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T01:56:55.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Power, Not Progress: An Alternative Reading of L'Hôpital's Legal Reforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2010

Amalia D. Kessler
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Forum: Comment
Information
Law and History Review , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , August 2010 , pp. 837 - 842
Copyright
Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kim, Marie Seong-Hak, “Civil Law and Civil War: Michel de L'Hôpital and the Ideals of Legal Unification in Sixteenth-Century France,” Law and History Review 28 (3) (2010): 797CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2. Ibid., 806.

3. Ibid., 809.

4. Ibid., 826.

5. Ibid.

6. Ibid.

7. Ibid.

8. Ibid., 798.

9. Kim, Marie Seong-Hak, Michel de L'Hôpital: The Vision of a Reformist Chancellor During the French Religious Wars (Kirksville, Mo.: Sixteenth Century Journal Publishers, 1997)Google Scholar.

10. Kim, “Civil Law and Civil War,” 806.

11. Ibid.

12. Ibid., 807.

13. Ibid., 818–821.

14. Ibid., 806.

15. Ibid., 807.

16. “Édit de François II, donné à Fontainebleau, au mois d'aoust 1560,” in Thieriet, M., Corps de droit commercial français, ou recueil méthodique des lois et autres actes et documents formant le texte d'un cours de droit commercial, ouvrage nécessaire à l'intelligence du code de commerce dont il est le complément (Paris: Hingray, 1841), 73Google Scholar.

17. Ibid.

18. Kim, “Civil Law and Civil War,” 813.

19. Ibid., 817.

20. Ibid., 815.

21. Caillemer, E., “Des résistances que les parlements opposèrent, à la fin du XVIe siècle, à quelques essais d'unification du droit civil,” in Le Code civil, 1804–1904: Livre du centenaire (Paris: Edouard Duchemin, 1969)Google Scholar, 2:1082 (describing the contemporary argument that substitutions were an important method for “sheltering [one's children and grandchildren] from expenditures of little honor”).

22. Ibid., 26.

23. Ibid., 39.

24. Hotman, François, Francogallia, ed. Giesey, Ralph E., trans. Salmon, J. H. M. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972)Google Scholar.