Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:34:51.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Naturals of This Republic:” Slave Law, Sovereignty, and the Legal Politics of Citizenship in the Río de la Plata Borderlands, 1845–1864

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2012

Joseph P. Younger
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1859, Cándido Xavier Azambuja appeared before officials in Salto, Uruguay demanding the return of an alleged fugitive slave, Pedro, pursuant to the terms of the 1851 Extradition Treaty between Brazil and Uruguay. According to Cándido's testimony, Pedro had fled from his brother Geronimo's estancia located near the Brazilian town of Bagé close to the Uruguayan border. Upon questioning, Cándido admitted that Pedro and Geronimo had been in the Estado Oriental briefly in 1851 in order to drive several herds of cattle back into Brazil, but argued that Pedro returned with his master and had never been to the Uruguayan Republic before or since. In response, Pedro argued that he was not a fugitive Brazilian slave, but rather a “natural of this republic.” Pedro claimed that he was born in Tacuarembó, Uruguay, and promptly produced the baptismal records to prove it. Pedro went on to note that his entire family consisted of free Uruguayans like himself. He then claimed that Cándido had repeatedly attempted “to make him a slave,” going so far as to remove him forcibly from his home and carry him across the border into Brazil. He requested protection from these continued threats to his and his family's basic rights under Uruguayan law.

Type
Articles
Information
Law and History Review , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , November 2012 , pp. 1099 - 1132
Copyright
Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Información relativa al negro Pedro, reclamando como esclavo. Archivo General de la Nación (hereafter AGN). Jefatura de Salto, s/n (1859); República Oriental del Uruguay. Tratados y Convenios Internacionales: Suscritos por el Uruguay en el periodo mayo de 1830 a diciembre de 1870 (Montevideo: Secretario del Senado, 1993), 34–37.

2. Throughout the nineteenth century, Uruguay was commonly referred to as the Estado Oriental. I use the two terms interchangeably throughout this article.

3. Información relativa al negro Pedro, reclamando como esclavo, s/n (1859), 2bis–3bis.

4. Ibid.

5. Williams, Eric Eustace, Capitalism and Slavery (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1944)Google Scholar; Davis, David Brion, The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1966)Google Scholar; David Brian Davis, The Problem of Slavery in the Age of Revolution, 1770–1823 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1975)Google Scholar; and David Brian Davis, Slavery and Human Progress (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar.

6. The literature of slave resistance in Brazil is vast. Examples include: Daronco, Leandro Jorge, Á sombra da cruz: trabalho e resistência servil no noroeste do Rio Grande do Sul, segundo os processos criminais, 1840–1888 (Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil: Universidade de Passo Fundo Editora, 2006)Google Scholar; Graden, Dale Torston, From Slavery to Freedom in Brazil: Bahia, 1835–1900 (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Reis, João José and Silva, Eduardo da, Negociação e conflito: a resistência negra no Brasil escravista (São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1989)Google Scholar, Chalhoub, Sidney, Visões da liberdade: uma história das últimas décadas da escravidão na corte (São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1990)Google Scholar; Schwarcz, Lilia Moritz, Retrato em branco e negro: jornais, escravos e cidadãos em São Paulo no final do século XIX (São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1987)Google Scholar; and Dean, Warren, Rio Claro: A Brazilian Plantation System, 1820–1920 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1976)Google Scholar. For an overview of the historiorgaphy focusing on slave resistance in Brazil, see Reis, João José, “Slaves as Agents of History: A Note on the New Historiography of Slavery in Brazil,” Ciencia e cultura 51 (1999): 437–45Google Scholar.

7. Reis and Silva, Negociação e conflito; and Chalhoub, Visões da liberdade.

8. Grinberg, Keila, Liberata, A lei da ambigüidade: as ações de liberdade da Corte de Apelação do Rio de Janeiro no século XIX (Rio de Janeiro: Relume–Dumará, 1994)Google Scholar.

9. Scott, Rebecca J., Degrees of Freedom: Louisiana and Cuba After Slavery (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005)Google Scholar; Scott, Rebecca J., The Abolition of Slavery and the Aftermath of Emancipation in Brazil (Durham: Duke University Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scott, Rebecca J., Slave Emancipation in Cuba: The Transition to Free Labor, 1860–1899 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1985)Google Scholar; and Maria, HebeCastro, Mattos Gomes de, Das cores do silêncio: os significados da liberdade no sudeste escravista – Brasil século XIX (Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 1995)Google Scholar.

10. Scott, Rebecca J., “‘She . . . Refuses to Deliver Up Herself as the Slave of Your Petitioner': Émigrés, Enslavement, and the 1808 Louisiana Digest of Civil Laws,” The Tulane European and Civil Law Forum 24 (2009)Google Scholar.

11. 60 U.S. (19 Howd.) 393 (1857). The literature on the Dred Scott decision is extensive. Examples include: Paul Finkelman, Dred Scott v. Sandford : A Brief History With Documents (Boston: Bedford/St. Martins, 1997); Fehrenbacher, Don E., Slavery, Law, and Politics: The Dred Scott Case in Historical Perspective (New York: Oxford University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; and Stampp, Kenneth, America in 1857: A Nation on the Brink (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), 93–94Google Scholar. Sue Peabody used the term “free soil” in connection with her work on questions of slavery, citizenship, and the geographic boundaries around each in mid-nineteenth century France. Peabody, Sue, “La question raciale et le ‘sol libre de France:’ l'affaire Furcy,” Annales: Histoire/Sciences Sociales 6 (2009): 1305–34Google Scholar. I thank an anonymous reviewer for pointing this connection out to me.

12. Van Cleve, George, “Forum: Somerset's Case Revisited: Somerset's Case and Its Antecedents in Imperial Perspective,” Law and History Review Fall 2006Google Scholarhttp://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lhr/24.3/cleve.html (September 14, 2010).

13. Peabody, Sue, “There Are No Slaves in France”: The Political Culture of Race and Slavery in the Ancien Regime (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

14. Hulsebosch, Daniel J., “Forum: Comment: Nothing But Liberty: Somerset's Case and the British Empire,” Law and History Review Fall 2006CrossRefGoogle Scholarhttp://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lhr/24.3/hulsebosch.html (September 14, 2010); see also Van Cleve, George, “Forum: Response: Mansfield's Decision: Toward Human Freedom,” Law and History Review Fall 2006Google Scholarhttp://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lhr/24.3/cleve1.html (September 14, 2010).

15. Salvatore, Ricardo Donato, Wandering Paysanos: State Order and Subaltern Experience in Buenos Aires During the Rosas Era (Durham: Duke University Press, 2003), 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16. Important examples include: Mallon, Florencia E., Peasant and Nation: The Making of Postcolonial Mexico and Peru (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Joseph, G. M. and Nugent, Daniel, Everyday Forms of State Formation: Revolution and the Negotiation of Rule in Modern Mexico (Durham: Duke University Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Chambers, Sarah C., From Subjects to Citizens: Honor, Gender, and Politics in Arequipa, Peru, 1780–1854 (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999)Google Scholar; Walker, Charles, Smoldering Ashes: Cuzco and the Creation of Republican Peru, 1780–1840 (Durham: Duke University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Guardino, Peter F., Peasants, Politics, and the Formation of Mexico's National State: Guerrero, 1800–1857 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar. For Argentina, see De la Fuente, Ariel, Children of Facundo: Caudillo and Gaucho Insurgency During the Argentine State-formation Process (La Rioja, 1853–1870) (Durham: Duke University Press, 2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17. Guardino, Peasants, Politics, 4; Lasso, Marixa, Myths of Harmony: Race and Republicanism During the Age of Revolution, Colombia 1795–1831 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Blanchard, Peter, Under the Flags of Freedom: Slave Soldiers and the Wars of Independence in Spanish South America (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. Chambers, From Subjects to Citizens, 8.

19. Benton, Lauren, “‘The Laws of This Country': Foreigners and the Legal Construction of Sovereignty in Uruguay, 1830–1875,” Law and History Review Fall 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar. http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/lhr/19.3/benton.html (September 14, 2010).

20. Jeremy Adelman has argued that following the collapse of the Iberian empires, conflicts over sovereignty proved so intractable precisely because they involved questions of both how to define the legal personalities and rights of subjects, as well as how to draw borders around the political community itself. Jeremy Adelman, Sovereignty and Revolution in the Iberian Atlantic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006), 6.

21. Devoto, Juan E. Pivel and de Pivel Devoto, Alcira Ranieri, Rivera, Oribe y los orígenes de la Guerra Grande (Montevideo, Uruguay: Medina, 1971)Google Scholar; Juan E. Pivel Devoto and Alcira Ranieri de Pivel Devoto, La guerra grande, 1839–1851 (Montevideo: Editorial Medina, 1971)Google Scholar.

22. For the importance of slavery in the Brazilian borderlands, see, among others, Luís Augusto Ebling Farinatti, “Confins Meridionais: famílias de elite e sociedade agrária na Fronteira Sul do Brasil (1825–1865)” (PhD diss., Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Sociais, 2007), 298–313; Bell, Stephen, Campanha Gaúcha: A Brazilian Ranching System, 1850–1920 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), 46–49Google Scholar; and Leitman, Spencer, “Slave Cowboys in the Cattle Lands of Southern Brazil, 1800–1850,” Revista de História (São Paulo) 51 (1975): 167–77Google Scholar. For rural Argentina and Uruguay, see Garavaglia, Juan Carlos and Gelman, Jorge D., “Rural History of the Rio de la Plata, 1600–1850: Results of a Historiographical Renaissance,” Latin American Research Review 30 (1995): 87Google Scholar.

23. de Sant'Ana Petiz, Silmei, Buscando a liberdade: as fugas de escravos da província de São Pedro para o além-fronteira, 1815–1851 (Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil: Universidade de Passo Fundo, UPF Editora, 2006), 40–51Google Scholar.

24. Borucki, Alex, Chagas, Karla, and Stalla, Natalia, Esclavitud y trabajo: un estudio sobre los afrodescendientes en la frontera uruguaya (1835–1855) (Montevideo: Pulmón Ediciones, 2004), 34–35Google Scholar; and Petiz, Buscando a liberdade, 58–60.

25. Borucki, Chagas, and Stalla, Esclavitud y trabajo, 36–37.

26. Ibid., 44–50.

27. Barrán, José Pedro, Apogeo y crisis del Uruguay pastoril y caudillesco: 1839–1875 (Montevideo: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental, 1977), 24Google Scholar.

28. Borucki, Chagas, and Stalla, Esclavitud y trabajo, 63–74.

29. Correspondência de Câmara Municipal de São Borja. Arquivo Histórico do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (hereafter AHRGS), L. 258, M. 233 in Petiz, Buscando a liberdade, 64.

30. Slenes, Robert W., “The Brazilian Internal Slave Trade, 1850–1888: Regional Economies, Slave Experience and Politics of a Peculiar Market,” in The Chattel Principle: Internal Slave Trades in the Americas, ed. Johnson, Walter (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004), 325–75Google Scholar, Borucki, Chagas, and Stalla, Esclavitud y trabajo, 148–9.

31. Barrán, Apogeo y crisis, 40–1.

32. Pivel Devoto and Ranieri de Pivel Devoto, La Guerra Grande, 100–04.

33. Bandeira, Luiz Alberto Moniz, La formación de los estados en la cuenca del plata: Argentina, Brasil, Uruguay, Paraguay (Buenos Aires: Grupo Ed. Norma, 2006), 164Google Scholar.

34. Barrán, José Pedro and Nahum, Benjamín, Historia rural del Uruguay moderno, vol. 1 (Montevideo: Ediciones de la Banda Oriental, 1967), 60Google Scholar.

35. Información relativa al negro Pedro, reclamando como esclavo, 4bis–5. The original testimony is recorded by a scribe and therefore written in the third person.

36. Ibid., 4bis.

37. Borucki, Chagas, and Stalla, Esclavitud y trabajo, 74–97.

38. Información relativa al negro Pedro, reclamando como esclavo, 3bis.

39. Ibid., 4bis. As Rebecca Scott has noted, the baptism of a freeborn child represented “one of the strongest forms of proof of freedom.” Scott, “She . . . Refuses to Deliver Up,” 125.

40. For additional examples of these types of collective strategies to win freedom in connection with fugitive slaves, see Gebara, Ademir, O mercado de trabalho livre no Brasil, 1871–1888 (São Paulo, SP: Brasil, 1986), 129–30Google Scholar, Petiz, Buscando a liberdade.

41. Información relativa al negro Pedro, reclamando como esclavo, 4bis.

42. Jeremias José Nunes c. Doña Belmire Caetana Guterres e seus filhos, cujo autor sequem por appelação para a relação do distrito, Arquivo Público do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (hereafter APRGS). Civel e Crime. Ações Ordinarias. Alegrete. Maço 35, No. 843 (1854).

43. Jeremias José Nunes c. Doña Belmire Caetana Guterres e seus filhos. The litigation record for this proceeding does not contain page numbers.

44. Ministério das Relações Exteriores and Brazil and Brazilian Government Document Digitization Project, “Relatório da repartição dos negocios estrangeiros, Anexo “A”.” (Rio de Janeiro: Typ. Nacional, 1850), http://bibpurl.oclc.org/web/22175. Nunes’ land is listed as entry No. 406. November 10, 2012.

45. Ibid., No. 470.

46. Información relativa al negro Pedro, reclamando como esclavo, at 13bis–14.

47. de Souza, Susana Bleil and Prado, Fabrício, “Las representaciones del Brasil en el discurso de los constructores de la identidad uruguaya en el siglo XIX,” in Fronteras, Indígenas y Migrantes en América del Sur, ed. Trinchero, Hector Hugo (Córdoba, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Avanzados, 2002), 165–98Google Scholar.

48. José da Asumpção Pereyra, subdito Brasilero y apoderado general de su madre Dn. Bernadina Maria Pereyra, residente en la Probincia de Rio Grande al Gefe Político Dn. Diego Lamas, AGN. Jefatura de Salto. (1856). In the police investigation, Uruguayan officials refer to the Ferreira family as “Pereyra.” In their own documents submitted in connection with the investigation, they refer to themselves as “Ferreira.” I use the family's spelling throughout.

49. Ibid. The police investigation records for this case were not numbered.

50. Ibid.

51. Ibid. Fermin's strategy of effectively seeking a new master was relatively common. Petiz, Buscando a liberdade; and Borucki, Chagas, and Stalla, Esclavitud y trabajo.

52. Fermin's freedom remained relative because he continued to be bound to Manuel Ferreira through a labor contract. However, Fermin and Manuel Ferreira now negotiated his service in a context in which Fermin was legally free, potentially offering the former slave a substantial chip to bargain for better conditions. Fermin had to stay in Uruguay to retain this power.

53. Petiz, Buscando a liberdade, 69.

54. Because of the number of “Ferreiras” involved in the intra–family dispute over Fermin's status, I will refer to the various family members by their first names from this point forwards.

55. Petiz, Buscando a liberdade, 69 (quoting AHRGS. Grupo Documental Estatística, maço 1, lata 531).

56. D. Agustin Sañudo c. D. José da Asunción Ferreira, Cobrando Especialmente 751 Patacones, Archivo General de la Nación—Secciones Judiciales (hereafter AGN-SJ). Letrados Civiles. Salto. No. 24 (1856).

57. José Pinto de Oliveira c. José d'Assumpção Ferreira, APRGS. Alegrete. Crimes. Maço 78, No. 2736 (1852).

58. José da Asumpção Pereyra, subdito Brasilero y apoderado general de su madre Dn. Bernadina Maria Pereyra.

59. Ibid.

60. Ibid.

61. Ibid.

62. Agustin Sañudo c. José Da Asunción Ferreyra, 30bis. The note in question originated from a commercial transaction between Luis Gonzaga Ferreira and Antonio José de Vargas in 1852 in connection with Canabarro's 1851 Uruguayan campaign against Oribe.

63. Testimonio del Testamento de D. Manuel Fereira Bica, AGN-SJ. Letrados Civiles. Salto. No. 11 (1876).

64. Don Agustin Sañudo c. Don José Da Asunción Ferreyra, Cobrando Especialmente 751 Patacones, 30bis–31.

65. Felizberta Benita de Mota por la causa de Joaquim Gonzaga Ferreira, AGN-SJ. Letrados Civiles. Salto. No. 25 (1858).

66. Leon Piris and Lucas Piris may be related. However, I have been unable to locate any archival evidence conclusively establishing this fact.

67. Felizberta Benita de Mota por la causa de Joaquim Gonzaga Ferreira.

68. Chirif also possessed connections to Venancio Flores. Flores wrote to Chirif in 1865, referring to him as his “esteemed friend” and thanking him for his help with the war effort. AGN. Jefatura de Salto. Venancio Flores al Señor Don J. Cherif (September 7, 1865).

69. AGN. Particulares. Archivo de General Lucas Piriz, Caja 9, Carpeta 5, Carta Confidencial de Lucas Piriz al Exmo. Sor. D. Gabriel Antonio Pereyra, No. 30 (August 8, 1856).

70. Felizberta Benita de Mota por la causa de Joaquim Gonzaga Ferreira, 5bis.

71. Ibid., 11.

72. Ibid., 13–14.

73. Gomez, Juan Carlos, Juan Carlos Gomez: Su Actuación en la Prensa de Montevideo, vol. 2 (Montevideo: Imprenta Artística y Encuadernación de Dornaleche Hermanos, 1921), 298–300Google Scholar.

74. Ibid., 14.

75. Benton, “The Laws of this Country,” 505–9; and Barrán, Apogeo y crisis, 81; and de Souza and Prado, “Las representaciones del Brasil.”

76. Poyo, Juan José, Juan José Poyo a sus conciudadanos (Rio Grande: n.p., 1850), 15Google Scholar.

77. Ibid.

78. de Souza and Prado, “Las representaciones del Brasil,” 173, n. 12. Although ostensibly a colorado, Lamas is a difficult figure to situate ideologically. Lamas seemed to chase power, supporting both Berro's blanco government and then later Venancio Flores’ colorado rebellion when his campaign against the Berro government gained strength in 1864.

79. Borucki, Chagas, and Stalla, Esclavitud y trabajo, 150.

80. Andrés Lamas, Carta del Legación Oriental del Uruguay en el Brasil (April 14, 1857), reprinted in “La nacionalidad de los hijos de los brasileños en la República,” Revista Histórica de la Universidad I:1 1907 202–12. Although Lamas did not make direct mention of the race of the soldiers in these particular letters, it was well understood by all parties that the practice at issue was the capture and enslavement (or impressment) of black soldiers in the borderlands. Ibid., 149–51, de Souza and Prado, "Las representaciones del Brasil,” 179.

81. Kittleson, Roger, “The Paraguayan War and Political Culture: Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 1865–1880,” in I Die with My Country: Perspectives on the Paraguayan War, 1864–1870, ed. Kraay, Hendrik and Whigham, Thomas L. (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2004), 111Google Scholar.

82. This ran directly counter to the 1830 Uruguayan Constitution, which established natural citizenship through birth in the Republic. Adolfo Rodriguez, El Digesto Nacional: compendio de las leyes, decretos del gobierno y demas resoluciones y actos oficiales de la República Oriental del Uruguay (Montevideo: Establecimiento Tipográfico y Litográfico de Luciano Mege, 1860), 43.

83. Andrés Lamas, "La nacionalidad de los hijos de brasileños nascidos en la República,” Revista Histórica de la Universidad I (1907): 205.

84. de Souza and Prado, "Las representaciones del Brasil,” 177.

85. Lamas, “La nacionalidad de los hijos,” 207; and de Souza and Prado, “Las representaciones del Brasil,” 173–82.

86. Lamas, “La nacionalidad de los hijos,” 207.

87. Ibid. (emphasis in original).

88. Ibid.

89. Ibid.: 212.

90. Barrán, Apogeo y crisis, 80.

91. Borucki, Chagas, and Stalla, Esclavitud y trabajo, 138–47.

92. Ibid., 141–43.

93. Barrán, Apogeo y crisis, 88–96.

94. Whigham, Thomas, The Paraguayan War (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2002), 144–51Google Scholar.

95. Ibid.

96. De la Fuente, Children of Facundo.

97. Salles, Ricardo, Guerra do Paraguai: escravidão e cidadania na formação do exército (Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1990), 63–77Google Scholar.

98. Graden, From Slavery to Freedom in Brazil: Bahia, 1835–1900, 53–82.

99. Conrad, Robert Edgar, The Destruction of Brazilian Slavery, 1850–1888 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972), 204–9Google Scholar.