Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:48:45.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Idea-Systems in Law: Images of Nineteenth-Century Germany - James Q. Whitman, The Legacy of Roman Law in the German Romantic Era: Historical Vision and Legal Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990. Pp. xi, 281 $39.50 (ISBN: 0-691-05560-2). - Michael John, Politics and the Law in Late Nineteenth-Century Germany: The Origin of the Civil Code, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989. Pp. 277 $64.00 (ISBN: 0-19-822748-5).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2011

David J. Gerber
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law and History Review , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Spring 1992 , pp. 153 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. See Koschaker, Paul, Europa und das Römische Recht (Munich, 1947).Google Scholar

2. During this evolution, Roman law was restructured in accordance with the systematization schemes of natural law, and even its content was frequently altered, so that the Roman law of the nineteenth century often was far different from that of the sixteenth century, not to mention the Roman law of antiquity.

3. See, for example, Watson, Alan, The Making of the Civil Law (Cambridge, Mass., 1981).Google Scholar

4. Whitman's principal concern is not to describe the doctrinal content of Roman law, although he sometimes provides such descriptions to clarify more general points about the roles of Roman law. When he does, he does so with impressive depth.

5. I suspect that this cognitive factor is critical to his penetration of the material and his ability to perceive the interaction between the intellectual and political components of his story.

6. The code remained necessary for national unity, although “unity” now referred primarily to protecting the social fabric against disintegration in the face of socialism and other forms of populist agitation rather than to the original issue of holding the various geographical entities of the Reich together.

7. For the concept of a “grammar of law,” see Damaska, Mirjan R., “A Continental Lawyer in an American Law School: Trials and Tribulations of Adjustment,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 116 (1968): 1363–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8. Few who have had extensive experience with both German and American lawyers would deny, for example, that the legal discourse of German lawyers tends to be far more abstract than that of American lawyers. This difference is due, at least in part, to the abstract system of the German Civil Code and to the absence of an analogous system in the United States.

9. See Gerber, David J., “Extraterritorial Discovery and the Conflict of Procedural Systems” American Journal of Comparative Law 34 (1986): 745–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. I suspect that the high degree of systematization in such systems is associated with many of the major differences between civil and common law jurisdictions.

11. The growing importance of theory in at least some areas of United States substantive law increases the likelihood of this type of development.