Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-05T02:32:22.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Custom and Law in the Social Order: Some reflections upon French Catalan peasant communities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2011

Louis Assier-Andrieu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Until assuming the violent form most strikingly exemplified in France by the explosions of 1789 and 1848, the century-long movement of resistance and emancipation of the European peasantry mainly occurred in the legal domain. The focus of opposition was towards the attempt to impose a normative system which sought to undermine the working rules of peasant communities. It was carried through, for example, by protesting against seignorial obligations or by asserting claims to the free use of forests and communal pastures. In such actions the peasant will, revitalized by periodic subsistence crises, tried to maintain control over legal institutions, and therefore to retain relative social autonomy.

Type
Articles
Information
Law and History Review , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Spring 1983 , pp. 86 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © the American Society for Legal History, Inc. 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Soboul, Albert, Problèmes Paysans de la Révolution Francaise, 1789–1848, (Paris, 1976Google Scholar).

2. The fieldwork upon which the author's discussion is based was carried out from 1976 to the present in Capcir and Cerdagne (Pyrénés–Orientales). For a detailed consideration of the evidence, see Assier-Andrieu, L., Coutume et Rapports Sociaux. Etude Anthropologique des Communautés Paysannes du Capcir, (Paris, 1981Google Scholar).

3. Bouthors, A., Les Sources du Droit Rural Cherchées dans l'Histoire des Communaux et des Communes (Paris, 1865Google Scholar); Glasson, E., ‘Communaux et Communautes dans l'Ancien Droit Francais.‘ Nouvelle Revue Historique de Droit Francois et Étranger XV (1891) 446–79Google Scholar.

4. de Coulanges, N. D. Fustel, ‘Le Problème des Origines de la Propriété Foncière‘ in Questions Historiques (Paris, 1893) 17–117Google Scholar.

5. ‘le pres, les terres ou varenes qui appartiennent à une communauté d'habitans, où ils ont droit d'envoyer paitre leur bestiaux.’

6. Hilton, R. H., Bond Men Made Free: Medieval Peasant Movements and the English Rising of 1381 (London, 1977) 29Google Scholar.

7. The routes and public roads, flowing water, natural wells, the meadows and ‘coustumiers et coustumes … sont les usagiers et usages de bois, pascage ou pasnage. Francois Regueau, Glossaire du Droit Francois, 1583, Eusebe de Lauriere, ed. Slatkine Reprints (Genève, 1969) reprint of the 1704 Paris edition (Noirt, 1882).

8. Goody, Jack, The Domestication of the Savage Mind (Cambridge, 1977Google Scholar) in Goody, Jack, ed., Literacy in Traditional Societies (Cambridge, 1968Google Scholar).

9. Chartes de peuplement, reconnaissances de privileges, concessions de droits d'usage, etc.

10. In southern regions this process is considered to be a result of the diffusion of Roman law, while in northern France it was derived from royal authority (e.g., Ordonnance de Montils-les-Tours, Avril 1453). Cf. Hinojosa, E. de, ‘La Admision del Derecho Romano en Cataluny,‘ Bolletin de la Real Academic de Buenas Letras de Barcelona, A. 10 (1910) 209–221Google Scholar; Rius, J. M. Fonty, ‘La recepcion del derecho romano en la peninsula ibérica durante la edad media,‘ Recueil de Mémories et Travaux de la Société d'Histoire du Droit et des Institutions des Anciens Pays de Droit Écrit, VI (1967) 85–104Google Scholar; A. Gouron, ‘Les étapes de la pénétration du droit remain dans l'ancienne septimanie au moyen age,’ Annales du Midi (1957); Dawson, J. P., ‘The Codification of the French Customs,’ 38 Michigan Law Review 765–800 (1940Google Scholar).

11. Bonnassié, Pierre, La Catalogne De milieu du Xe à la fin du Xle siècle. Croissance et Mutations d'une Société (Toulouse, 1976) 711Google Scholar et. seq.

12. ‘Stratae et viae publicae, aquae currentes et fontes vivi, prata, pascuae, silvae et garricae et roche in hac patria fundatae sunt de potestatibus, non ut habeant per alodium vel teneant in dominio, sed sint omni tempore ad emparamentum conctorum populorum sine ullius contrarietatis obstaculo et sine aliquo constituto servicio,‘ Us. 72 in Antiquiores Barchinonensium leges quas vulgus usaticos appeallat (Barcelona, 1544) CXXVGoogle Scholar.

13. For a more detailed investigation of this complex process, see Assier-Andrieu, Coutume et Rapports Sociaux, supra note 2, 35–6.

14. Fibhol, Rene, ‘La rédaction des coutumes en France aux XVe et XVIe siècles,‘ in Gilissen, John, ed., La Rédaction des Coutumes dans le Passé et dans le Présent (Bruxelles, 1962) 63–78Google Scholar.

15. Berkner, Lutz, ‘Rural Family Organization in Europe: a Problem in Comparative History,‘ Peasant Studies Newsletter 4 (1972) 145–56Google Scholar.

16. Recueil de jurisprudence du Conseil souverain du Roussillon, T.III, f:226, Archives départmentales des Pyrénées-Orientales, Ms. 31.

17. Joseph Goy, ‘Les intellectuels et la pratique sociale: des imprudences de la législation successorale révolutionnaire au “bricolage” du Code civil,‘ unpublished typescript.

18. The Capcir is considered to be one of those Pyrenean ‘redoubts’ refractory until the late nineteenth century to a men's literacy process that happened to be effective as soon as eighteenth century in the western region of Béarn. Fabre, Daniel, ‘Alphabétisation et cultures populaires dans les Pyrénées. Propositions pour une recherche,’ in Les Pyrénées et les Carpathes (XVIe-XXe siècles,) (Varsovie-Cracovie, 1981) 113–34Google Scholar.

19. It would be necessary to gather all the acts dealing with private land access in each community over several generations.

20. Diamond, Stanley, ‘The rule of law versus the order of custom,’ in Reasons, C. E. and Rich, R. M., eds., The Sociology of Law: a Conflict Perspective (Toronto, 1978) 245–46Google Scholar.