Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:14:23.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preemptive Reform and the Mexican Working Class

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2022

Kenneth M. Coleman  and
Charles L. Davis
Kenneth M. Coleman
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky, Lexington
Charles L. Davis
Affiliation:
University of Kentucky Center at Fort Knox
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study offers a definition of preemptive reform, applies the concept to Mexico in the 1970s, describes the reaction of one target group of the Mexican reform effort, and develops a preliminary explanatory model of reactions to preemptive reform. Because preemptive reform has been an important element in Mexican politics, it is especially appropriate to examine the concept as it applies to the Mexican case. However, preemptive reform has been attempted elsewhere and these results may interest others who would seek to understand the phenomenon in a variety of settings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , 1983 , pp. 3 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

*

We wish to thank our colleagues Lee Sigelman and Stanley Feldman, as well as our collaborator Francisco Zapata, for useful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript. Special thanks are also due to Robert Johnston for assistance with data analysis for earlier versions of this paper, and to the anonymous reviewers of LARR, who induced us to write a better paper. Finally, we acknowledge with gratitude the financial resources made available to this project by the National Science Foundation and the University of Kentucky, neither of which bears any responsibility for interpretations advanced herein.

References

Almond, Gabriel, and Verba, Sidney 1963 The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Bo, and Cockcroft, James 1966 “Control and Co-optation in Mexican Politics.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 7(1):11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Charles W. 1967 Politics and Economic Change in Latin America: The Governing of Restless Nations. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Asher, Herbert B. 1976 Causal Modeling. Volume 3 in Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. London and Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Bem, Darryl 1970 Beliefs, Attitudes and Human Affairs. Belmont, California: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
Bizarro, Salvatore 1981 “Mexico's Poor.” Current History 80(469):370-73, 393.Google Scholar
Bortz, Jeff 1977 “El salario obrero en el Distrito Federal, 1939–1975.” Investigación Económica 4(Oct.–Dec.):129–70.Google Scholar
Camacho, Manuel 1980 La clase obrera en la historia de México: el futuro inmediato. Mexico City: Siglo XXI and Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Cingranelli, David L. 1981 “Race, Politics and Elites: Testing Alternative Models of Municipal Service Distribution.” American Journal of Political Science 25(4):664–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Phillip 1964 “On the Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter, David. Glencoe, Illinois: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 1981 “Immigration, Mexican Development Policy and the Future of U.S.Mexican Relations.” In Mexico and the United States, edited by Robert McBride, pp. 104–27. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 1975 Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Charles L. Johnston, Robert; and Coleman, Kenneth M. 1981 “Mexican Presidents, Public Policy and Public Opinion: Working Class Assessments of the Echeverría and López Portillo Sexenios.” Paper read at the 1981 Meeting of the Southeastern Conference of Latin American Studies in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, in April.Google Scholar
Easton, David 1971 The Political System: An Inquiry into the State of Political Science, second edition. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon 1957 A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. New York: Harper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, E. V. K. 1979 “Stabilisation Policy in Mexico: The Fiscal Deficit and Macroeconomic Equilibrium, 1960–1977.” In Inflation and Stabilisation in Latin America, edited by Thorp, Rosemary and Whitehead, Lawrence. New York: Holmes and Meier.Google Scholar
Green, Rosario 1979 “Cambios recientes en la política de deuda exterior del gobierno mexicano.” Foro Internacional 75(Jan.–Mar.):453–71.Google Scholar
Gregory, Peter 1980 “Employment, Unemployment and Underemployment in Latin America.” Statistical Bulletin of the Organization of American States 2(4):1–20.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee 1981 “Official Interpretations of Rural Underdevelopment: Mexico in the 1970s.” Working Papers in United States-Mexican Studies, no. 20. LaJolla, California: Program in United States-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Grindle, Merilee 1977 “Policy Change in an Authoritarian Regime: Mexico Under Echeverría.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 19(4):523–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Roger D. 1974 The Politics of Mexican Development. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1963 Journeys toward Progress. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Huerta C., Arturo 1977 “Características y contradicciones de la industria de transformación en México de 1970 a 1976.” investigación Económica 36(4):11–42.Google Scholar
Jain, Shail 1975 Size Distribution of Income. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
Jelin, Elizabeth 1979 “Orientaciones e ideologías obreras en América Latina.” In Fuerza de trabajo y movimientos laborales en América Latina, edited by Rubén Katzman and José Luis Reyna, pp. 233–62. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Katz, Daniel 1960 “The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 24:163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jae-On 1975 “Factor Analysis.” In Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, second edition, by Norman H. Nie, et al., pp. 468–514. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Krauss, Ellis S., and Fendrich, James M. 1980 “Political Socialization of U.S. and Japanese Adults: The Impact of Adult Roles on College Leftism.” Comparative Political Studies 13(1):3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Looney, Robert E. 1978 Mexico's Economy: A Policy Analysis with Forecasts to 1990. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin J. 1981a “Political Change and Political Reform in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Mexico.” Working Papers of the Center for Latin American Studies, no. 103. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin J. 1981b “Political Change in Mexico.” In Mexico-United States Relations, edited by Susan Kaufman Purcell, pp. 55–66. New York: Academy of Political Science.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward, and Williams, Carol 1980 “Dynamics of Political Support-Alienation.” Comparative Political Studies 13(1):33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'DONNELL, GUILLERMO 1973 Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro 1971 “Leftist Radicalism in Chile: A Test of Three Hypotheses.” Comparative Politics 2(2):251–74.Google Scholar
Purcell, Susan Kaufman 1977 “The Future of the Mexican System.” In Authoritarianism in Mexico, edited by José Luis Reyna and Richard S. Weinert, pp. 173–92. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Purcell, Susan Kaufman 1975 The Mexican Profit-Sharing Decision: Politics in an Authoritarian Regime. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, Susan Kaufman, and Purcell, John F. H. 1980 “State and Society in Mexico: Must a Stable Polity Be Institutionalized?” World Politics 32(2): 194–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redclift, Michael R. 1981 “Development Policy-Making in Mexico: The Sistema Alimentario Mexicano (SAM).” Working Papers in United States-Mexican Studies, no. 24. La Jolla, California: Program in United States-Mexican Studies, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Reyna, Jose Luis 1979 “El movimiento obrero en una situación de crisis: México, 1976–1978.” Foro Internacional 19(3):390–401.Google Scholar
Reyna, Jose Luis 1974 “Control político, estabilidad, y desarrollo en México.” Cuadernos del C.E.S., no. 3. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Clark W. 1977 “Why Mexico's ‘Stabilizing Development’ Was Actually Destabilizing: With Some Implications for the Future.” Testimony before the Sub-Committee on Inter-American Economic Relationships of the Joint Economic Committee of the United States (17 January):37–56. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rout, Lawrence 1982 “Mexico's Real Underemployment Rate Is Debated on Both Sides of the Border.” Wall Street Journal, 4 February, p. 24.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Steven E. 1981 “The Sistema Alimentario Mexicano: Post-Agrarista Manuevers against the New International Division of Labor.” Paper read at the 1981 Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Conference of Latin American Studies in Tuscaloosa, Alabama.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Steven E. 1980 “Authoritarianism, Populism and the New International Division of Labor: State and Regime in the Mexican Oil Boom.” Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association in Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Steven E. 1979 “Agrarian Struggle in Sonora, 1970–1976: Manipulation, Reform, and the Defeat of Populism.” Paper read at the Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert 1980 “Politics in Mexico.” In Comparative Politics Today: A World View, edited by Gabriel Almond and G. Bingham Powell, pp. 435–80. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Scott, Robert 1964 Mexican Government in Transition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O. Hensler, Carl P.; and Speer, Leslie K. 1979 “Whites' Opposition to Busing: Self-Interest or Symbolic Politics?” American Political Science Review 73(2):360–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapira, Yoram 1977 “Mexico: The Impact of the 1968 Student Protest on Echeverría's Reformism.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 19(4)(Nov.):557–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred 1978 The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Evelyn P. 1974 Protest and Response in Mexico. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Street, James 1981 “Mexico's Economic Development Plan.” Current History 80(469):374-78, 388 ff.Google Scholar
Villarreal, Rene 1977 “The Policy of Import-Substituting Industrialization, 1929–1975.” In Authoritarianism in Mexico, edited by José Luis Reyna and Richard S. Weinert, pp. 67–107. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Lawrence 1980 “La política económica del sexenio de Echeverría: ¿qué salió mal y por qué?” Foro Internacional 79:484–513.Google Scholar
Zazueta, Cesar, and Vega, Jose Luis 1981 Comportamiento de la negociación de salarios contractuales en México, 1977 y 1979. Study series 12. Mexico City: Centro Nacional de Información y Estadísticas de Trabajo.Google Scholar