Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:31:34.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Civil Society and Support for the Political System in Times of Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Carew E. Boulding
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Jami Nelson-Núñez
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

How does civil society affect support for the political system during times of political crises? Some argue that civil society strengthens support for political systems by increasing trust and participation. Yet recent scholarship demonstrates that civil society can also facilitate mobilization and dissent, which may undermine support for the political system, especially in times of crisis. We test these competing claims using individual-level data from a country in the midst of a major political crisis: Bolivia in 2004. We find that membership in civil society organizations leads to higher levels of diffuse support for the political system even during a crisis—and even among those who have recently participated in protest. Civil society, however, is not associated with higher support for government during the crisis. Despite extremely high levels of mobilization, extreme dissatisfaction with government, and evidence that membership in associations actively facilitates political protest, civil society continues to be positively associated with support for the political system.

Resumen

Resumen

¿Cómo la sociedad civil afecta en el apoyo al sistema político en tiempos de crisis política? Algunos sostienen que la sociedad civil debe fortalecer el apoyo a los sistemas políticos mediante el aumento de la confianza y la participación. Sin embargo, estudios recientes demuestran que la sociedad civil también puede facilitar la movilización y la disidencia, lo que puede socavar el apoyo al sistema político, especialmente en tiempos de crisis. Examinamos la validez de estas dos proposiciones utilizando datos a nivel individual de un país en medio de una crisis: Bolivia en 2004. Encontramos que el pertenecer en las organizaciones de la sociedad civil conduce mayores niveles de apoyo difuso al sistema político, incluso durante una crisis, incluso entre los que han participado recientemente en protestas. La sociedad civil, sin embargo, no se asocia con un mayor apoyo al gobierno durante la crisis. A pesar de niveles extremadamente altos de movilización, la insatisfacción extrema con el gobierno, y la evidencia que la pertenencia a asociaciones activamente facilita la protesta política, la sociedad civil sigue siendo positivamente asociada con el apoyo al sistema político.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

We thank the Latin American Public Opinion Project and its major supporters (the US Agency for International Development, the UN Development Program, the Inter-American Development Bank, and Vanderbilt University) for making the data available. We would also like to thank Andy Baker, Damarys Canache, José Cheibub, Amy Liu, Patricio Navia, Irfan Nooruddin, and Milan Svolik for comments.

References

Anderson, Christopher J., and Guillory, Christine A. 1997Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 6681.Google Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Singer, Matthew M. 2008The Sensitive Left and the Impervious Right.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 564599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Tverdova, Yuliya V. 2003Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 91109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Sheri 1997Civil Society and Political Institutionalization.” American Behavioral Scientist 40 (5): 562574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, John A., and Seligson, Mitchell A. 2005Political Legitimacy and Participation in Costa Rica: Evidence of Arena Shopping.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (4): 537550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, John A., and Seligson, Mitchell A. 2009 The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin America: Political Support and Democracy in Eight Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, Geert, and Steven van de, Walle 2003Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indicators of ‘Good Governance’: Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 69 (3): 329343.Google Scholar
Boulding, Carew E. 2010NGOs and Political Participation in Weak Democracies: Subnational Evidence on Protest and Voter Turnout from Bolivia.” Journal of Politics 72 (2): 456468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, John, and Rahn, Wendy 1997Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 9991023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canache, Damarys 2002 Venezuela: Public Opinion and Protest in a Fragile Democracy. Miami: University of Miami.Google Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E. 2011Distrusting Democrats and Political Participation in New Democracies Lessons from Chile.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (3): 668687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Ryan E., and Singer, Matthew M. 2011Support for Polyarchy in the Americas.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (11): 15001526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chanley, Virginia, Rudolph, Thomas, and Rahn, Wendy 2000The Origins and Consequences of Public Trust in Government: A Time Series Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (3): 239256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, John D. 1991 Democratizing Development: The Role of Voluntary Organizations. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Gerard 1998Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Politics in the Developing World.” Political Studies 46 (1): 3652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Timothy E., and Gronke, Paul 2005The Skeptical American: Revisiting the Meanings of Trust in Government and Confidence in Institutions.” Journal of Politics 67 (3): 784803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, Joseph 2006NGOs, Politics and Grassroots Mobilisation: Evidence from Bangladesh.” Journal of South Asian Development 1 (1): 7799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry 1999 Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Easton, David 1975A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5 (4): 435457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinal, Rosario, Hartlyn, Jonathan, and Kelly, Jana Morgan 2006Performance Still Matters: Explaining Trust in Government in the Dominican Republic.” Comparative Political Studies 39 (2): 200223.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Richard E., Waisman, Carlos Horacio, and Zamosc, León 2006 Civil Society and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1987The Effects of Participation on Political Efficacy and Political Support: Evidence from a West German Panel.” Journal of Politics 49 (2): 441464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., Muller, Edward N., and Seligson, Mitchell A. 1989Economic Crisis, Incumbent Performance and Regime Support: A Comparison of Longitudinal Data from West Germany and Costa Rica.” British Journal of Political Science 19 (3): 329351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., Sabatini, Christopher A., and Bevis, Gwendolyn G. 2000Civic Education, Civil Society, and Political Mistrust in a Developing Democracy: The Case of the Dominican Republic.” World Development 28 (11): 18511874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Julie 1998 Nongovernments: NGOs and the Political Development of the Third World. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Christopher J. N., Fumo, Claudia, and Kuby, Thomas 1999 Nongovernmental Organizations in World Bank-Supported Projects. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagopian, Frances, and Mainwaring, Scott P. 2005 The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 1998The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” American Political Science Review 92 (4): 791808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiskey, Jonathan, and Seligson, Mitchell A. 2003Pitfalls of Power to the People: Decentralization, Local Government Performancea and System Support In Bolivia.” Studies in Comparative International Development 37 (4): 6488.Google Scholar
Hudock, Ann 1999 NGOs and Civil Society. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hulme, David, and Edwards, Michael 1997 NGOs, States and Donors: Too Close for Comfort. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1968 Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jamal, Amaney A. 2007 Barriers to Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jamal, Amaney, and Nooruddin, Irfan 2010The Democratic Utility of Trust: A Cross-National Analysis.” Journal of Politics 72 (1): 4559.Google Scholar
Keele, Luke 2007Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 241254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelleher, Christine A., and Wolak, Jennifer 2007Explaining Public Confidence in the Branches of State Government.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (4): 707721.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred 1996 Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McAllister, Ian 1999The Economic Performance of Governments.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by Norris, Pippa, 188203. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mercer, Claire 2002NGOs, Civil Society and Democratization: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Progress in Development Studies 2 (1): 522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H. 1974Rejoinder to ‘Comment’ by Jack Citrin: Political Discontent or Ritualism?American Political Science Review 68 (3): 9891001.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard 1999Five Years after the Fall: Trajectories of Support for Democracy in Post-Communist Europe.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, edited by Norris, Pippa, 7899. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard 2001What Are the Origins of Political Trust? Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-Communist Societies.” Comparative Political Studies 34 (1): 3062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitlin, Diana, Hickey, Sam, and Bebbington, Anthony 2007Reclaiming Development? NGOs and the Challenge of Alternatives.” World Development 35 (10): 16991720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Edward N., and Jukam, Thomas O. 1977On the Meaning of Political Support.” American Political Science Review 71 (4): 15611595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, Edward N., Jukam, Thomas O., and Seligson, Mitchell A. 1982Diffuse Political Support and Antisystem Political Behavior: A Comparative Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 26 (2): 240264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdie, Amanda, and Bhasin, Tavishi 2011Aiding and Abetting: Human Rights INGOs and Domestic Protest.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (2): 163191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newton, Kenneth 2009Social and Political Trust.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, edited by Dalton, Russell and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, 342361. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, ed. 1999 Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, Jenny 2000 Development, NGOs, and Civil Society: The Debate and Its Future. Development in Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxfam GB.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993 Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2001 Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Rossteutscher, Sigrid 2010Social Capital Worldwide: Potential for Democratization or Stabilizer of Authoritarian Rule?American Behavioral Scientist 53 (5): 737757.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 1983On the Measurement of Diffuse Support: Some Evidence from Mexico.” Social Indicators Research 12 (1): 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 2006The Measurement and Impact of Corruption Victimization: Survey Evidence from Latin America.” World Development 34 (2): 381404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A., and Carrion, Julio F. 2002Political Support, Political Skepticism, and Political Stability in New Democracies: An Empirical Examination of Mass Support for Coups d'Etat in Peru.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 5882.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A., Morales, Daniel Moreno, and Blum, Vivian 2004Democracy Audit Bolivia 2004 Report.” Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Latin American Public Opinion Project. http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/bolivia/2004-audit.pdf.Google Scholar
Smith, Amy Erica 2009Legitimate Grievances: Preferences for Democracy, System Support, and Political Participation in Bolivia.” Latin American Research Review 44 (3): 102126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. 2004 Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherford, M. Stephen 1987How Does Government Performance Influence Political Support?Political Behavior 9 (1): 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamosc, Leon 2007The Indian Movement and Political Democracy in Ecuador.” Latin American Politics and Society 49 (3): 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar