No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Activistas Hablan de Religión Y Movimientos Sociales, Lima 2010
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2022
Resumen
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Este artículo transcribe y considera la discusión suscitada en Lima, Perú entre activistas y académicos de las Américas tras nuestra presentación de trabajos preliminares sobre religión y movimientos sociales progresistas. Al concluir las ponencias, planteamos al público varias preguntas para pensar sus experiencias con la religión en el marco de su activismo. El artículo intenta capturar el interés y la diversidad de intervenciones al invertir la dinámica etnográfica convencional, dándole prioridad al informante en lugar del investigador. Confirma así un importante deseo entre activistas de comentar y debatir el papel de la religión en las luchas sociales. Observamos una amplia gama de respuestas marcada en sus extremos por posiciones antagónicas. Algunos comentaristas representaron a la religión como la que acoge, protege y da fuerza a movimientos sociales y sus participantes. Otros ven en la religión un marco opresivo que conlleva legados históricos coloniales de machismo, verticalismo y pensamiento único.
Abstract
This article transcribes and considers the discussion that ensued in Lima, Peru, between activists and academics from the Americas after we presented preliminary research on religion and progressive social movements. Following formal remarks, we posed several questions for the audience to reflect on, specifically regarding the place of religion in their activism. This article attempts to capture the resulting public interest and diversity of action by inverting the conventional ethnographic dynamic, prioritizing informants instead of researchers. It therefore confirms an important desire to comment on and debate the role of religion in social struggles. We observed a spectrum of responses marked at its extremes by antagonistic positions. Some represented religion as that which comforts, protects, and offers strength to social movements and their participants. Others see in religion an oppressive framework shaped by colonial legacies of machismo, verticalism, and homogeneous thinking.
- Type
- Part 2: Activists Speak About Religion
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2014 by the University of Texas Press
References
Referencias
Arias, Arturo, ed., con una respuesta de David Stoll 2001 The Rigoberta Menchú Controversy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Auyero, Javier 2003 Contentious Lives: Two Argentine Women, Two Protests, and the Quest for Recognition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barrios de Chungara, Domitila, Viezzer, con Moema 1978 Let Me Speak! Testimony of Domitila, a Woman of the Bolivian Mines. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Beverly, John 1994 Testimonio: On the Politics of Truth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Burgos, Elisabeth 1983 Me llamo Rigoberta Menchú y así me nació la conciencia. Barcelona: Editorial Argos Vergara.Google Scholar
Clifford, James, y Marcus, George E., eds. 1986 Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, Norman K. 1997 Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duque, José Roberto, y Muñoz, Boris 1995 La ley de la calle: Testimonios de jóvenes protagonistas de la violencia en Caracas. Caracas: Fundarte.Google Scholar
Gay, Robert 2005 Lucia: Testimonies of a Brazilian Drug Dealer's Woman. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Darnell M. 1996 Screening the Los Angeles “Riots”: Race, Seeing, and Resistance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Daniel 2001 Doña Maria's Story: Life History, Memory, and Political Identity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jack 2004 “On the Rhetoric and Politics of Ethnographic Method”. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 595 (1): 280–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Daniel H. 1992 Popular Voices in Latin American Catholicism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Sidney 1974 Worker in the Cane: A Puerto Rican Life History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca 2001 Freedom Is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Laurel 1993 “Poetics, Dramatics, and Transgressive Validity: The Case of the Skipped Line”. Sociological Quarterly 34 (4): 695–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roseberry, William 1980 Reseño de Let Me Speak! Testimony of Domitila, A Woman of the Bolivian Mines, por Domitila Barrios de Chungara, con Moema Viezzer. American Anthropologist 82 (1): 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Jeffrey W., y Sokoloff-Rubin, Emma 2013 Sustaining Activism: A Brazilian Women's Movement and a Father-Daughter Collaboration. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Smilde, David A. 2004 “Los evangélicos y la polarización: La moralización de la política y la politización de la religión”. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales 10 (2): 163–179.Google Scholar
Smilde, David A. 2007 Reason to Believe: Cultural Agency in Latin American Evangelicalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smilde, David A. 2013 “Religião e conflitos políticos na Venezuela: Católicos e evangélicos frente a o governo de Hugo Chávez”. Religião e Sociedade 32 (2): 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty 1988 “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271-313. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
You have
Access