Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:51:53.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Building Municipal Institutional Effectiveness in Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Jennifer Pribble
Jennifer Pribble*
Affiliation:
University of Richmond. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Institutional effectiveness varies widely across Chile's 346 municipalities. Whereas some local governments seem to work with impeccable precision, others struggle to deliver basic services and welfare benefits to the population. This article seeks to explain why such variation exists; it combines quantitative and qualitative evidence to show how mayors can play a crucial role in building institutional effectiveness. The study focuses on the administration of Chile's municipal job placement offices. It finds that municipalities where mayors have held office for three or more consecutive terms exhibit stronger institutional capacity than those localities where electoral turnover is the norm. The analysis, therefore, underscores an interesting finding: electoral competition has the potential both to improve and to undermine administrative capacity.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , Fall 2015 , pp. 100 - 121
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, Jorge Antonio. 2013. (Un?)Healthy Politics: The Political Determinants of Subnational Health Systems in Brazil. In Subnational Research in Comparative Politics. Providence: Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies, Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University. Google Scholar
Brown, David, and Hunter, Wendy. 1999. Democracy and Social Spending in Latin America, 1980–92. American Political Science Review 93, 4: 778–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coordinator of Employment Programs, Puente Alto OMIL. 2013. Author interview. Santiago, April 25.Google Scholar
Director, El Bosque Office of Development, Innovation, and Territorial Entrepreneurship. 2013. Author interview. Santiago, April 23.Google Scholar
Director of Local Outreach, Puente Alto OMIL. 2013. Author interview. Santiago, April 25.Google Scholar
Director, Puente Alto Office for Productivity Growth. 2013. Author interview. Santiago, April 25.Google Scholar
Director of Research, Servicio Nacional de Capacitación y Empleo. 2013. Author interview. Santiago, April 3.Google Scholar
Director, Servicio Nacional de Capacitación y Empleo. 2013. Author interview. Santiago, April 3.Google Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2004a. Designing Subnational Institutions: Regional and Municipal Reforms in Post-Authoritarian Chile. Comparative Political Studies 37, 2: 218–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Kent. 2004b. Politics Beyond the Capital: The Design of Subnational Institutions in South America. Stanford: Stanford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. 2010. Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2013. What is Governance? Working Paper. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
Gervasoni, Carlos. 2010a. Measuring Variance in Subnational Regimes: Results from an Expert-Based Operationalization of Democracy in the Argentine Provinces. Journal of Politics in Latin America 2, 2: 13–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gervasoni, Carlos. 2010b. A Rentier Theory of Subnational Regimes: Fiscal Federalism, Democracy, and Authoritarianism in the Argentine Provinces. World Politics 62, 2: 302–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudy, Agustina. 2012. Varieties of Subnational Undemocratic Regimes: Evidence from Argentina and Mexico. Studies in Comparative International Development 48, 1: 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudy, Agustina. 2015. Democrats and Autocrats: Pathways of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Continuity Within Democratic Countries. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grindle, Merilee. 2007. Going Local: Decentralization and the Promise of Good Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2008. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Harbers, Imke. 2014. Taxation and the Unequal Reach of the State: Mapping State Capacity in Ecuador. Governance 28, 3: 373–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Patrick. 2000. Degrees of Democracy: Some Comparative Lessons from India. World Politics 52 (July): 484–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
High Official 1. 2013. Confederation of Production and Commerce (Cpc). Author interview. Santiago, April 24.Google Scholar
High Official 2. 2013. El Bosque Omil Office. Author interview. Santiago, April 23.Google Scholar
High Official 3. 2013. Pudahuel Omil Office. Author interview. Santiago, April 12.Google Scholar
High Official 3. 2014. Author phone interview. Santiago, June 12.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2012. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Mustillo, Thomas, and Stephens, John D.. 2008. Politics and Social Spending in Latin America. Journal of Politics 70: 420–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE). 2002. National census. Santiago. www.ine.cl/cd2002 Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. 2001. Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America. World Politics 53 (July): 553–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 2012. Poverty Amid Plenty in the New India. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2006. Programmatic and Non Programmatic Party-Voter Linkages in Two Institutionalized Party Systems: Chile and Uruguay in Comparative Perspective. Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2014. Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Mardones, Rodrigo. 2013. The Political Use of Targeted Social Funds in Non-Machine/Strong State Contexts: the Case of Education Transfers in Chile (2001–2009). Unpublished mss. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.Google Scholar
Mardones, Rodrigo. 2007. The Congressional Politics of Decentralization: the Case of Chile. Comparative Political Studies 40, 3: 333–58.Google Scholar
Mazzuca, Sebastián. 2012. Legitimidad, autonomía y capacidad: conceptualizando (una vez más) los poderes del estado. Revista de Ciencia Política 32, 3: 545–60.Google Scholar
McGuire, James. 2010. Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, Alfred P., and Samuels, David. 2004. Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Google Scholar
Niedzwiecki, Sara. 2013. Determinants of Social Policy Peformance. Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo. 1993. On the State, Democratization, and Some Conceptual Problems: a Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries. World Development 21, 8: 1355–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterkatz, Sandra Chapman. 2013. Commitment, Capacity, and Community: the Politics of Multi-Level Health Reform in Spain and Brazil. Ph.D. diss., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Pribble, Jennifer. 2013. Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen L., and Wibbels, Erik. 2000. The Subnational Politics of Economic Adjustment: Provincial Politics and Fiscal Performance in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies 33, 4: 419–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Servicio Electoral de Chile (Servel). 2013. Resultados electorales 2013. www.servel.cl. Accessed February 13, 2013.Google Scholar
Singh, Prerna. 2011. We-ness and Welfare: a Longitudinal Analysis of Social Development in Kerala, India. World Development 39, 2: 282–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sistema Nacional de Información Municipal (SINIM). 2013. Dataset. Santiago. http://datos.sinim.gov.cl Google Scholar
Soifer, Hillel. 2015. State Building in Latn America. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2012. Diffusion of Good Government: Social Sector Reforms in Brazil. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulchin, Joseph S., and Selee, Andrew. 2004. Decentralization and Democratic Governance in Latin America. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1977. Political Brokers in Chile: Local Government in a Centralized Polity. Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar
Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2008. Radical Democracy in the Andes. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, Eliza, Garman, Christopher da C. B., and Haggard, Stephan. 1999. The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 34, 1: 7–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2008. Why Some Cities Provide More Public Goods than Others: a Subnational Comparison of the Provision of Public Goods in German Cities in 1912. Studies in Comparative International Development 43: 273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar