Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T22:39:58.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Link Between Voting and Life Satisfaction in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Rebecca Weitz-Shapiro  and
Matthew S. Winters
Rebecca Weitz-Shapiro
Affiliation:
Brown University. [email protected]
Matthew S. Winters
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What is the relationship between voting and individual life satisfaction in Latin America? While studies of Western Europe suggest that voters are happier than nonvoters, this relationship has not been explored in the younger democracies of the developing world, including those of Latin America. Using multilevel regression models to examine individual-level survey data, this study shows a positive correlation between voting and happiness in the region, noting, however, that the relationship is attenuated in those countries that have enforced compulsory voting. We then explore the causal direction of this relationship: while the existing literature points to voting as a possible determinant of individual happiness, it is also possible that happier individuals are more likely to vote. Three different strategies are used to disentangle this relationship. On balance, the evidence suggests that individual happiness is more likely to be a cause rather than an effect of voting in Latin America.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , Winter 2011 , pp. 101 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Christopher, Blais, André, Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Listhaug, Ola. 2005. Loser's Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. New York : Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Los Angeles : University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, Samuel, and Gintis, Herbert. 1986. Democracy and Capitalism: Property, Community, and the Contradictions of Modern Social Thought. New York : Basic Books.Google Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). 2008. World Factbook. Washington , DC : U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold D., and Acock, Alan C.. 1989. National Elections and Political Attitudes: the Case of Political Efficacy. British Journal of Political Science 19, 4: 551–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, Aage R. 1968. Response Validity: Vote Report. Public Opinion Quarterly 32, 4: 588–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Tella, Rafael, and MacCulloch, Robert. 2006. Some Uses of Happiness Data in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 20, 1 (Winter): 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Tella, Rafael, and MacCulloch, Robert. 2008. Gross National Happiness as an Answer to the Easterlin Paradox. Journal of Development Economics 86: 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorn, David, Fischer, Justina A. V., Kirchgässner, Gebhard, and Sousa-Poza, Alfonso. 2008. Direct Democracy and Life Satisfaction Revisited: New Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of Happiness Studies 9: 227–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drèze, Jean, and Sen, Amartya K.. 2002. India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity. New York : Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A. 1974. Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence. In Nations and Households in Economic Growth, ed. David, P. A. and Reder, Melvin W.. New York : Academic Press. 89–125.Google Scholar
Electoral Commission (United Kingdom). 2006. Compulsory Voting around the World: Executive Summary. http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/document-summary?assetid=13240. Accessed October 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1985. Reciprocal Effects of Participation and Political Efficacy: a Panel Analysis. American Journal of Political Science 29: 891–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1987. The Effects of Participation on Political Efficacy and Political Suppot: Evidence from a West German Panel. Journal of Politics 49, 2: 441–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, James H., Baker, Laura A., and Dawes, Christopher T.. 2008. Genetic Variation in Political Participation. American Political Science Review 102, 2 (May): 233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., and Stutzer, Alois. 2000. Happiness Prospers in Democracy. Journal of Happiness Studies 1: 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., and Stutzer, Alois. 2005a. Beyond Outcomes: Measuring Procedural Utility. Oxford Economic Papers 57: 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., and Stutzer, Alois. 2005b. Happiness Research: State and Prospects. Review of Social Economy 62, 2 (June): 207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, Bruno S., Benz, Mathias, and Stutzer, Alois. 2004. Introducing Procedural Utility: Not Only What, but Also How Matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 160, 3 (September): 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and Hill, Jennifer. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York : Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, Dowling, Conor M., and Shang, E. Ha. 2010. Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts. American Political Science Review 104, 1 (February): 111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsberg, Benjamin, and Weissberg, Robert. 1978. Elections as Legitimizing Institutions. In Parties and Elections in an Anti-Party Age, ed. Fishel, Jeff. Bloomington : Indiana University Press. 179–85.Google Scholar
Graham, Carol, and Pettinato, Stefano. 2001. Happiness, Markets, and Democracy: Latin America in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies 2, 3 (September): 237–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haller, Max, and Hadler, Markus. 2006. How Social Relations and Structures Can Produce Happiness and Unhappiness: an International Comparative Analysis. Social Indicators Research 75, 2 (January): 169–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, John F., and Huang, Haifang. 2008. How's Your Government? International Evidence Linking Good Government and Well-Being. British Journal of Political Science 38: 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helliwell, John F., and Putnam, Robert D.. 2004. The Social Context of Well-Being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 359: 1435–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeda, Ken'ichi, Kobayashi, Tetsuro, and Hoshimoto, Maasa. 2008. Does Political Participation Make a Difference? the Relationship between Political Choice, Civic Engagement, and Political Efficacy. Electoral Studies 27, 1: 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 2000. Globalization and Postmodern Values. Washington Quarterly 23, 1 (Winter): 215–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA). n.d. Compulsory Voting. http://www.idea.int/vt/compulsory_voting.cfm. Accessed October 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Keim, Donald W. 1975. Participation in Contemporary Democratic Theories. In Participation in Politics, ed. Pennock, J. Roland and Chapman, John W.. New York : Lieber-Atherton. 1–38.Google Scholar
Klandermans, Bert. 1989. Grievance Interpretation and Success Expectations: the Social Construction of Protest. Social Behaviour 4, 2: 113–25.Google Scholar
Leighley, Jan. 1991. Participation as a Stimulus of Political Conception. Journal of Politics 53, 1: 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyubomirsky, Sonja, King, Laura A., and Diener, Ed. 2005. The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success? Psychological Bulletin 131, 6 (November): 803–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mansbridge, Jane. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meredith, Marc. 2008. Persistence in Political Participation. Manuscript. Stanford University.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1862. Considerations on Representative Government. New York : Harper and Brothers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J., Hibbing, Matthew V., Canache, Damarys, Seligson, Mitchell A., and Anderson, Mary R.. 2010. Personality and Civic Engagement: an Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior. American Political Science Review 104, 1 (February): 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muhlberger, Peter. 2005. Democratic Deliberation and Political Identity: Enhancing Citizenship. Paper presented at the 2005 Annual Meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Toronto, July 3–6.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo A. 1994. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy 5, 1 (January): 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Marvin E. 1982. Participatory Pluralism. Chicago : Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin. 2001. Politics, Markets, and Life Satisfaction: the Political Economy of Human Happiness. American Political Science Review 95, 4 (December): 939–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin. 2005. Class Organization and Subjective Well-Being: a Cross-National Analysis. Social Forces 84, 1: 513–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., Brehm, John, and Carlson, Neil. 1999. National Elections as Institutions for Generating Social Capital. In Civic Engagement and American Democracy, ed. Fiorina, Morris P. and Skocpol, Theda. Washignton , DC : Brookings Institution Press. 111–60.Google Scholar
Ryan, Richard M., and Deci, Edward L.. 2001. On Happiness and Human Potentials: a Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being. Annual Review of Psychology 52: 141–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schyns, Peggy. 1998. Cross-national Differences in Happiness: Economic and Cultural Factors Explored. Social Indicators Research 43: 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, Amartya K. 2001. Development as Freedom. New York : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silver, Brian D., Anderson, Barbara A., and Abramson, Paul R.. 1986. Who over-reports Voting? American Political Science Review 80, 2 (June): 613–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbergen, Marco R., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2002. Modeling Multilevel Data Structures. American Journal of Political Science 46, 1: 218–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenner-Day, Katen, and Fischle, Mark. 1992. The Effects of Political Participation on Political Efficacy: a Simultaneous Equations Model. Australian Journal of Political Science 27, 2 (July): 282–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stutzer, Alois, and Frey, Bruno S.. 2006. Political Participation and Procedural Utility: an Empirical Study. European Journal of Political Research 45, 3: 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2008. Representation, Corruption, and Subjective Well-Being. Comparative Political Studies 41, 12: 1607–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 1970. The Democratic Citizen: Social Science and Democratic Theory in the Twentieth Century. New York : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Veenhoven, Ruut. 1988. The Utility of Happiness. Social Indicators Research 20: 333–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veenhoven, Ruut. 1995. The Cross-National Pattern of Happiness: Test of Predictions Implied in Three Theories of Happiness. Social Indicators Research 34, 1 (January): 33–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veenhoven, Ruut. 2005. Apparent Quality-of-Life in Nations. Social Indicators Research 71: 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Lori. 2003. Rugged Individuals and Social Butterflies: the Consequences of Social and Individual Political Participation for Political Tolerance. Social Science Journal 40, 2: 334–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar