Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:56:15.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

¡Despierta México! Changing Public Attitudes Toward NAFTA, 2008–2018

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 February 2022

Mark Aspinwall Open the ORCID record for Mark Aspinwall [Opens in a new window]  and
Gerardo Maldonado Open the ORCID record for Gerardo Maldonado [Opens in a new window]
Mark Aspinwall
Affiliation:
Mark Aspinwall is a professor of international relations at the Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE), Mexico City, Mexico. [email protected].
Gerardo Maldonado
Affiliation:
Gerardo Maldonado is an associate professor of international relations at CIDE. [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Regional trade agreements have important consequences for developing countries, but the public opinion literature on trade agreements suffers from several shortcomings. Most significant is that studies tend to take a single year as the point of analysis, leaving us uncertain as to how opinion evolves. This study uses polling data to examine Mexicans’ attitudes toward NAFTA over a ten-year period. Results from regression analyses show an association between Mexicans’ support for the United Nations and their support for NAFTA, and a weaker relationship for other types of cues (presidential, the United States), than other studies have found. The data also reveal an association between Donald Trump’s arrival in the presidency and increased support for NAFTA.

Keywords

North American Free Trade Agreementpublic opinionMexicotime seriescueingDonald TrumpUnited Nations
Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , February 2022 , pp. 23 - 46
Copyright
© The Authors 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the University of Miami

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: We, (Mark Aspinwall and Gerardo Maldonado), declare none.

References

Althaus, Scott L. 1998. Information Effects in Collective Preferences. American Political Science Review, 92: 545–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J. 1998. When in Doubt, Use Proxies: Attitudes Toward Domestic Politics and Support for European Integration. Comparative Political Studies 31, 5: 569–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beliz, Gustavo, and Chelala, Santiago. 2016. The DNA of Regional Integration. Technical note. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank, October. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/The-DNA-of-Regional-Integration-Latin-American-Views-on-High-Quality-Convergence-Innovation-Equality-and-Care-for-the-Environment.pdf Google Scholar
Boomgaarden, Hago, Schuck, Andreas, Elenbaas, Matthijs, and De Vreese, Claes. 2011. Mapping EU Attitudes: Conceptual and Empirical Dimensions of Euroscepticism and EU Support. European Union Politics 12, 2: 241–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bow, Brian, and Santa-Cruz, Arturo. 2011. Mexican Anti-Americanism and Regional Integration in North America. Norteamérica: Revista Académica del CISAN-UNAM 6, 2: (July-December): 35–66.Google Scholar
Brinegar, Adam, and Jolly, Seth. 2005. Location, Location, Location: National Contextual Factors and Public Support for European Integration. European Union Politics 6, 2: 155–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Maxwell A., and Tomlin, Brian W.. 2000. The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gracia, Cárdenas, Jaime. 2015. Las características jurídicas del neoliberalismo. Cuestiones Constitucionales 32: 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, Miguel, Visconti, Giancarlo, and Acácio, Igor. Forthcoming. The Trump Election and Attitudes Toward the United States in Latin America. Public Opinion Quarterly. www.miguelcarreras.com/uploads/9/2/5/9/92597726/carreras_visconti_and_acacio.2021.poq.pdf Google Scholar
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE). Las Américas y el mundo (LAYEM, The Americas and the World). Survey datasets. www.lasamericasyelmundo.cide.edu Google Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel. 2000. Western Dreams, Eastern Realities: Support for the European Union in Central and Eastern Europe. Comparative Political Studies 33, 10: 243–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Charles L. 1998. Mass Support for Regional Economic Integration: The Case of NAFTA and the Mexican Public. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 14, 1 (Winter): 105–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Charles L., and Bartilow, Horace A.. 2007. Cognitive Images and Support for International Economic Agreements with the United States Among Mexican Citizens. Latin American Politics and Society 49, 2: 123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Charles L., Gabel, Matthew J., and Coleman, Kenneth M.. 1998. Citizen Response to Regional Integration in the Americas: The Cases of Costa Rica and El Salvador. Studies in Comparative International Development 33, 2 (Summer): 88–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dellmuth, Lisa M., and Tallberg, Jonas. 2021. Elite Communication and the Popular Legitimacy of International Organizations. British Journal of Political Science 51, 3: (July): 1292–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutschmann, Emanuel, and Minkus, Lara. 2018. Swinging Leftward: Public Opinion on Economic and Political Integration in Latin America, 1997–2010. Latin American Research Review 53, 1: 38–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and McCann, James A.. 1996. Democratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and Electoral Choices. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Down, Ian, and Wilson, Carol J.. 2017. A Rising Generation of Europeans? Revisited. European Journal of Political Research 56, 1: 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist . 2014. NAFTA at 20: Deeper, Better, NAFTA. January 4.Google Scholar
Elgün, Özlem, and Tillman, Erik R.. 2007. Exposure to European Union Policies and Support for Membership in the Candidate Countries. Political Research Quarterly 60, 3: 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estrades, Carmen. 2006. Opinión pública y MERCOSUR: conocimiento y apoyo de los uruguayos al proceso de integración regional. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política 15, 1: 107–27.Google Scholar
Fairbrother, Malcolm. 2019. Free Traders: Elites, Democracy, and the Rise of Globalization in North America. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbrother, Malcolm, Maldonado, Gerardo, Pérez-Armendáriz, Clarisa, and Long, Tom. 2019. Regionalization of What? Public Preferences and the Case of North America After 25 Years of NAFTA. Working Paper. Umeå University.Google Scholar
Flores-Macías, Gustavo A., and Sánchez-Talanquer, Mariano. 2019. The Political Economy of NAFTA/USMCA. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1–22. https://sancheztalanquer.com/docs/FloresMacias_SanchezTalan-quer_Political%20Economy%20of%20NAFTA-USMCA.pdf Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew. 1998. Public Support for European Integration: An Empirical Test of Five Theories. Journal of Politics 60, 2: 333–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garry, John, and Tilley, James. 2015. Inequality, State Ownership and the European Union: How Economic Context and Economic Ideology Shape Support for the European Union. European Union Politics 16, 1: 139–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2001. Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences. American Political Science Review 95: 379–396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hiscox, Michael. 2006. Learning to Love Globalization: Education and Individual Attitudes Toward International Trade. International Organization 60, 2: 469–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakhverdian, Armen, Erika van Elsas, Wouter van der Brug, and Kuhn, Theresa. 2013. Euroscepticism and Education: A Longitudinal Study of 12 EU Member States, 1973–2010. European Union Politics 14, 4: 522–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harteveld, Eelco, van der Meer, Tom, and De Vries, Catherine. 2013. In Europe We Trust? Exploring Three Logics of Trust in the European Union. European Union Politics 14, 4:CrossRefGoogle Scholar
542-65.Google Scholar
Herzog, Alexander, and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2010. The Dynamics of Support: The Winners–Losers Gap in Attitudes Toward EU Membership in Post-Communist Countries. European Political Science Review 2, 2: 235–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Seth J. 2017. Learning Together Slowly: Bayesian Learning About Political Facts. Journal of Politics 79: 1403–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2005. Calculation, Community and Cues: Public Opinion on European Integration. European Union Politics 6, 4: 419–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John E., Mach, Bogdan W., and Miller-González, Jennifer L.. 2011. Buying Support and Regime Change: The Evolution of Polish Attitudes Towards the EU and Voting Between Accession and 2008. European Union Politics 12, 2: 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibarra, Jara, Camila. 2014. Public Support for Latin American Integration: An Econometric Model for the Assessment of Individual and Contextual Factors. Estudios Internacionales 46, 179: 35–60.Google Scholar
Johnson, Tana. 2011. Guilt By Association: The Link Between States’ Influence and the Legitimacy of Intergovernmental Organizations. Review of International Organizations 6, 1: 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Zuckermann, Leo. 1998. Attitudes Toward Economic Reform in Mexico: The Role of Political Orientations. American Political Science Review 92, 2 (June): 359–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kose, M. Ayhan, Meredith, Guy M., and Towe, Christopher M.. 2004. How Has NAFTA Affected the Mexican Economy? Review and Evidence. IMF Working Paper WP/04/59. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, April. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2004/wp0459.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, and Romero, Vidal. 2008. Partisan Cleavages, State Retrenchment, and Free Trade: Latin America in the 1990s. Latin American Research Review 43, 2: 107–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Mutz, Diana C.. 2013. US versus Them: Mass Attitudes Toward Offshore Outsourcing. World Politics 65, 4: 571–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merolla, Jennifer, Stephenson, Laura, Wilson, Carole, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth. 2005. Globalization, Globalización, Globalisation: Public Opinion and NAFTA. Law and Business Review of the Americas 11, 3–4: 573–96.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon. 2002. Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization. International Organization 56, 3 (Summer): 515–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlipphak, Bernd. 2015. Measuring Attitudes Toward Regional Organizations Outside Europe. Review of International Organizations 10, 3: 351–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 1999. Popular Support for Regional Economic Integration in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies 31, 1 (February): 129–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiller, Robert. 2019. Narrative Economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stancheva, Stephanie. 2020. Understanding Economic Policies: What Do People Know and Learn? Harvard University Working Paper.Google Scholar
Tucker, Joshua A., Pacek, Alexander C., and Berinsky, Adam J.. 2002. Transitional Winners and Losers: Attitudes Toward EU Membership in Post-Communist Countries. American Journal of Political Science 46, 3: 557–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vice, Margaret, and Chwe, Hanyu. 2017. Poor Ratings for Peña Nieto, Political Parties. Pew Research Center, September 24. https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2017/09/14/poor-ratings-for-pena-nieto-political-parties Google Scholar
Wals, Sergio C., Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, González, Frank J., and Gosda, Tess. 2015. Love Thy Neighbor? Trust in Foreigners and Support for Transnational Policies. Political Research Quarterly 68, 3: 537–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora Saenz, Itzkuauhtli. 2017. La opinión pública frente al TLCAN. Visor Ciudadano 54, August 20. Instituto Belisario Domínguez, Senado de la República, México. http://bibliodigitalibd.senado.gob.mx/handle/123456789/3657 Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Aspinwall and Maldonado supplementary material

Appendices S1-S5

Download Aspinwall and Maldonado supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 369.2 KB