Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:52:22.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Concertación's Defeat in Chile's 2009–2010 Presidential Elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Mauricio Morales Quiroga
Mauricio Morales Quiroga*
Affiliation:
Universidad Diego Portales, university’s Instituto de Ciencias Sociales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Concertación lost the recent presidential elections in Chile after 20 years in office. This article proposes three explanations for this result. First, the Concertación's candidate selection process through primaries was exclusionary, without opening up participation to all potential applicants. This combined with a deep erosion of the coalition, reflected in the resignation of deputies and senators from parties that compose it. The process was accelerated with the emergence of an independent candidate, formerly from the Concertación. Second, the candidate from the right increased his vote in the poorest sectors and expanded the right's constituency to middle-class segments, traditional Concertación electoral strongholds. Third, the right achieved greater electoral consistency than the Concertación by reducing the number of voters who split their tickets. Its presidential candidate obtained almost the same percentage as its list of deputies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , Summer 2012 , pp. 79 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. New York : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2004. Redibujando el mapa electoral chileno: incidencia de factores socioeconómicos y género en las urnas. Revista de Ciencia Política 24, 2: 49–66.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2005. Reforma al binominalismo: sistema paralelo de acumulación. Documento de Trabajo. Santiago: Instituto de Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. September.Google Scholar
Altman, David. 2008. Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Chile, 1990–2006. In Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America, ed. Siavelis, Peter and Morgenstern, Scott. University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press. 241–70.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Michael, and Schousen, Matthew. 1993. Policy Moderation or Conflicting Expectations? Testing and Intentional Models of Split-Ticket Voting. American Politics Quarterly 21: 410–38.Google Scholar
Aninat, Cristóbal, and Elaqua, Gregory. 2010. El electorado que decidió las elecciones 2009. Análisis estadístico de los segmentos socioeconómicos clave que definieron las últimas presidenciales. Documento de Trabajo. Santiago : Instituto de Políticas Públicas, Expansiva/Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen. 1999. Voter Responses to Electoral Complexity: Ticket Splitting, Rational Voters and Representation in the Federal Republic of Germany. British Journal of Political Science 29, 3: 487–505.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen, Baum, Lawrance, Clausen, Aage R., and Smith, Charles E.. 1992. Patterns and Sources of Ticket Splitting in Subpresidential Voting. American Political Science Review 86, 4: 916–28.Google Scholar
Born, Richard. 1994. Split-Ticket Voters, Divided Government, and Fiorina's Policy-Balancing Model. Legislative Studies Quarterly 19, 1: 126–29.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C., and Kimball, David C.. 1998. A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting. American Political Science Review 92, 3: 533–44.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1987. The Personal Vote. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, and Miller, Warren E.. 1957. The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split Ticket Voting. American Political Science Review 51, 2: 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John, and Polga-Hecimovich, John. 2006. Primary Elections and Candidate Strength in Latin America. Journal of Politics 68, 3: 530–43.Google Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., and Layman, Geoffrey C.. 2004. Policy Balancing and Preferences for Party Control of Government. Political Research Quarterly 57, 4: 541–50.Google Scholar
Cavallo, Ascanio. 1998. La historia oculta de la transición. Santiago : Grijalbo.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). Various years. Electoral surveys. http://www.cepchile.cl.Google Scholar
Concertación de Partidos por la Democracia. 2009. Rules of Votes and Ballots, Primaries 2009. http://www.primariasconcertacion.cl/documento.htm.Google Scholar
Cruz-Coke, Ricardo. 1984. Historia electoral de Chile: 1925–1973. Santiago : Editorial Jurídica de Chile.Google Scholar
Drake, Paul W. 1978. Socialism and Populism in Chile, 1932–1952. Urbana : University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Faúndez, Julio. 1992. Izquierdas y democracia en Chile, 1932–1973. Santiago : Ediciones BAT.Google Scholar
Ffrench-Davis, Ricardo. 2003. Entre el neoliberalismo y el crecimiento con equidad. Tres décadas de política económica en Chile. Santiago : J. C. Sáez.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1992. Divided Government. New York : Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1994. Divided Government in American States: A Byproduct of Legislative Professionalism. American Political Science Review 88: 304–16.Google Scholar
Garand, James C., and Lichtl, Marci Glascock. 2000. Explaining Divided Government in the United States: Testing and Intentional Model of Split-Ticket Voting. British Journal of Political Science 30, 1: 173–91.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1991. La redemocratización política en Chile. Transición, inauguración y evolución. Estudios Públicos 42: 101–33.Google Scholar
Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1999. Balance y perspectivas de la democratización política chilena. In La caja de pandora. El retorno de la transición chilena, ed. Menéndez Carrión, Amparo and Joignant, Alfredo. Santiago : Planeta/Ariel. 49–88.Google Scholar
Gil, Federico. 1969. El sistema político de Chile. Santiago : Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Haindl, Eric. 2007. Chile y su desarrollo económico en el siglo XX. Santiago : Andrés Bello.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Carlos. 1994. La transición ha terminado. Revista de Ciencia Política 16, 1–2: 33–40.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Carlos. 2001. El régimen de Pinochet. Santiago : Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Huneeus, Carlos. 2003. Chile un país dividido. La actualidad del pasado. Santiago : Catalonia.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Lau, Oliva. 2007. Ls: Least Squares Regression for Continuous Dependent Variables. In Zelig: Everyone's Statistical Software, ed. Imai, King, and Lau, . http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE). Various years. Electoral statistics. http://www.ine.cl.Google Scholar
Izquierdo, José Miguel, Mauricio Morales, and Navia, Patricio. 2008. Voto cruzado en Chile. ¿Por qué Bachelet obtuvo menos votos que la Concertación en 2005? Política y Gobierno 15, 1: 35–73.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary. 1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Competition in U.S. House Elections, 1946–1988. Boulder : Westview Press.Google Scholar
Joignant, Alfredo, and Navia, Patricio. 2003. De la política de individuos a los hombres del partido. Socialización, competencia política y penetración electoral de la UDI (1989–2001). Estudios Públicos 89: 129–72.Google Scholar
Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP). 2008. Presentación de resultados encuesta LAPOP 2008 Chile. Nashville : Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
López, Miguel Angel. 2004. Conducta electoral y estratos económicos: el voto de los sectores populares en Chile. Política 43: 285–98.Google Scholar
Maddox, William, and Nimmo, Dan. 1981. In Search of the Ticket-Splitter. Social Science Quarterly 62: 401–8.Google Scholar
Magar, Erica, Rosenblum, Marc, and Samuels, David. 1998. On the Absence of Centripetal Incentives in Double-Member Districts: the Case of Chile. Comparative Political Studies 31, 6: 714–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford : Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R.. 1995. La institucionalización de los sistemas de partidos en América Latina. Revista de Ciencia Política 17, 1–2: 63–102.Google Scholar
MIDEPLAN. 2006. Serie análisis de resultados de la Encuesta de Caracterización Socioeconómica Nacional (Casen 2006). http://www.mideplan.cl.Google Scholar
Morales Quiroga, Mauricio, and José Sánchez, María. 2010. La segunda es la vencida. Piñera y sus bases de apoyo. In Morales and Navia 2010. 57–78.Google Scholar
Morales Quiroga, Mauricio, and Navia, Patricio. 2010. El sismo electoral de 2009. Cambio y continuidad en las preferencias políticas de los chilenos. Santiago : Ediciones UDP.Google Scholar
Morales Quiroga, Mauricio, and Bugueño, Rodrigo. 2001. La UDI como expresión de la nueva derecha en Chile. Estudios Sociales 107: 215–48.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Oscar, and Stefoni, Carolina, eds. 2002. El período del Presidente Frei Ruiz-Tagle. Santiago : Universitaria.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2005a. La elección presidencial de 1993. Una elección sin incertidumbre. In Las elecciones presidenciales en la historia de Chile. 1920–2000, ed. Soto, Angel and Francisco, Alejandro San. Santiago : Centro de Estudios Bicentenario. 435–62.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2005b. La transformación de votos en escaños: leyes electorales en Chile, 1833–2004. Política y Gobierno 12, 2: 233–76.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio, and Saldaña, José. 2009. Voto cruzado en las elecciones parlamentarias y presidenciales en Chile (1993–2005). In El genoma electoral chileno. Dibujando el mapa genético de las preferencias políticas en Chile, ed. Navia, Mauricio Morales, and Briceño, Renato. Santiago : Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales. 141–64.Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter. 1995. Sistemas electorales y partidos políticos. Mexico City : FCE.Google Scholar
Otano, Rafael. 1995. Crónica de la transición. Santiago : Planeta.Google Scholar
Payne, Mark, Zovatto, Daniel, Carrillo, Fernando, and Allamand, Andrés. 2003. La política importa. Democracia y desarrollo en América Latina. Washington, DC : BID/Instituto Internacional para la Democracia y la Asistencia Electoral.Google Scholar
Portales, Felipe. 2000. Chile: una democracia tutelada. Santiago : Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scully, Timothy. 1992. Los partidos de centro y la evolución política chilena. Santiago : Stanford University/CIEPLAN/University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Servicio Electoral, República de Chile. Various years. Election data. http://www.servel.cl.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2009. Enclaves de la transición y democracia chilena. Revista de Ciencia Política 29, 1: 3–21.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter, and Morgenstern, Scott. 2008. Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America: A Framework for Analysis. In Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America, ed. Siavelis, and Morgenstern, . University Park : Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press. 3–37.Google Scholar
Sistema Nacional de Información Municipal (SINIM). Various years. Database. http://www.sinim.gov.cl.Google Scholar
Taagepera, Rein, and Grofman, Bernard. 2003. Mapping the Indices of Seats: Vote Disproportionality and Inter-Election Volatility. Party Politics 9, 6: 659–77.Google Scholar
La Tercera (Santiago). 2009. Encuesta: Frei y Enríquez en empate técnico primera vuelta. October 10: 6.Google Scholar
La%20Tercera.com. 2010. Lagos Weber por derrota de Frei: “El candidato no era el mejor para este minuto.” May 10. http://latercera.com/contenido/674_258330_9.shtml.Google Scholar
Terra.cl (Santiago). 2010. Concertación hace autocrítica por derrota presidencial en el marco de aniversario socialista. April 19. http://www.terra.cl.Google Scholar
Tironi, Eugenio. 2010. Radiografía de una derrota. Santiago : Uqbar.Google Scholar
Universidad Diego Portales (UDP). Various years. Election surveys. http://www.encuesta.udp.cl.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 2003. El quiebre de la democracia en Chile. Santiago : Colección Ciencia Política, Universidad Diego Portales.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Samuel. 1995. Orígenes y transformación del sistema de partidos en Chile. Estudios Públicos 58: 5–80.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Samuel. 1999. Respuesta a Eugenio Tironi y Felipe Agüero: reflexiones sobre el presente y futuro del paisaje político chileno a la luz de su pasado. Estudios Públicos 75: 273–90.Google Scholar
Zucco, Cesar. 2009. Stability Without Roots: Party System Institutionalization in Brazil. Working paper. Rio de Janeiro : Instituto Universitário de Pesquisas do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar