Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-rvxtl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-17T10:03:18.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bureaucratic Activism: Pursuing Environmentalism Inside the Brazilian State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2019

Rebecca Neaera Abers
Rebecca Neaera Abers*
Affiliation:
Rebecca Abers is a professor of political science at the Instituto de Ciência Política, Universidade de Brasília.
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores the evolution of the Green Grants program, run by Brazil’s Ministry of Environment, as a means for developing the concept of bureaucratic activism. When the Workers’ Party first took office in 2003, many social movement actors joined the government, especially in that agency. After 2007, however, most of these activists left the government. At the same time, the ministry substituted thousands of temporary employees for permanent civil servants. Surprisingly, this study finds that these public employees carried forward the environmentalist cause, even when this required contesting the priorities of superiors. Examining their attitudes and practices leads to a definition of activism as the proactive pursuit of opportunities to defend contentious causes. The case study helps to develop this concept and to demonstrate that workers inside bureaucracies can engage in activist behavior. It also explores the effects of bureaucratic activism on environmental policymaking in Brazil.

Keywords

environmentalismenvironmental policybureaucracyactivismcash transfersagency
Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 61 , Special Issue 2: State Transformation and Participatory Politics in Latin America , May 2019 , pp. 21 - 44
Copyright
© University of Miami 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abers, Rebecca Neaera, and Tatagiba, Luciana. 2015. Institutional Activism: Mobilizing for Women’s Health from Inside the Brazilian Bureaucracy. In Social Movement Dynamics: New Perspectives on Theory and Research from Latin America, ed. Rossi, Federico M. and von Bülow, Marisa. London: Ashgate. 73–101.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca Neaera, and Oliveira, Marília Silva. 2015. Nomeações políticas no Ministério do Meio Ambiente (2003–2013): interconexões entre ONGs, partidos e governos. Opinião Pública 21, 2: 336–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abers, Rebecca Neaera, Serafim, Lizandra, and Tatagiba, Luciana. 2014. Changing Repertoires of State-Society Interaction Under Lula. In Brazil Under the Workers’ Party: Continuity and Change from Lula to Dilma, ed. de Castro, Fabio, Koonings, Kees, and Wiesebron, Marianne. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 36–61.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca Neaera, de Oliveira, Marília Silva, and Pereira, Ana Karine. 2017. Inclusive Development and the Asymmetric State: Big Projects and Local Communities in the Brazilian Amazon. Journal of Development Studies 53, 6: 857–72.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca Neaera, von Bülow, Marisa, Little, Paul, and Millikan, Brent. 2000. Civil Society Participation in the Pilot Program to Conserve the Brazilian Rain Forest. Strategic Compact and Rain Forest Trust Fund Study. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Alonso, Angela, Costa, Valeriano, and Maciel, Débora. 2007. Identidade e estratégia na formação do movimento ambientalista brasileiro. Novos Estudos-CEBRAP no. 79: 151–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez, Sonia E. 1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women’s Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Amenta, Edwin, and Halfmann, Drew. 2012. Opportunity Knocks: The Trouble with Political Opportunity and What You Can Do About It. In Contention in Context: Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest, ed. Goodwin, Jeff and Jasper, James M.. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 227–39.Google Scholar
Arantes, Rogério Bastos. 2002. Ministério Público e política no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Sumaré.Google Scholar
Arantes, Rogério Bastos. 2015. Rendición de cuentas y pluralismo estatal en Brasil: Ministerio Público y Policía Federal. Desacatos no. 49: 28–47.Google Scholar
Arantes, Rogério Bastos. 2016. Protagonismo da justiça deslocou centro gravitacional da democracia brasileira. Combate Racismo Ambiental, September 25. http://racismoambiental.net.br/2016/09/25/rogerio-arantes-protagonismo-da-justica-deslocou-centro-gravitacional-da-democracia-brasileira. Accessed July 5, 2017.Google Scholar
Banaszak, Lee Ann. 2010. The Women’s Movement Inside and Outside the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berk, Gerald, and Galvan, Dennis C.. 2013. Processes of Creative Syncretism: Experiential Origins of Institutional Order and Change. In Political Creativity: Reconfiguring Institutional Order and Change, ed. Berk, Galvan, and Hattam, Victoria. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 29–54.Google Scholar
Bichir, Renata Mirandola. 2012. Desafios e oportunidades na implementação de novos arranjos de proteção social no Brasil e na Argentina. In Anais Do 36o Encontro Anual Da ANPOCs. Aguas de Lindóia: Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Ciências Sociais (ANPOCs).Google Scholar
Brandão, Igor Ribas, and Vilaça, Luiz Henrique Doria. 2017. Ativismo burocrático na construção de Belo Monte e na inclusão socioprodutiva de catadores de materiais recicláveis. In Anais do III Encontro Internacional Participação, Democracia e Políticas Públicas, Vitória, Espirito Santo.Google Scholar
Cayres, Domitila Costa. 2015. Ativismo institucional no coração da Secretaria-Geral da Presidência da República: a Secretaria Nacional de Articulação Social no governo Dilma Rousseff (2011–2014). Ph.D. diss., Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.Google Scholar
Clegg, Stewart. 2010. The State, Power, and Agency: Missing in Action in Institutional Theory? Journal of Management Inquiry 19, 1: 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, Michel. 1969. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Piscataway: Transaction.Google Scholar
Dagnino, Evelina, Olvera, Alberto J., and Panfichi, Aldo. 2006. Para uma outra leitura da disputa pela construção democrática na América Latina. In A disputa pela construção democrática na América Latina, ed. Dagnino and Olivera. São Paulo: Paz e Terra. 13–92.Google Scholar
D’Araújo, Maria Celina. 2007. A elite dirigente do governo Lula. Rio de Janeiro: CPDOC.Google Scholar
DiIulio, John D. Jr. 1994. Principled Agents: The Cultural Bases of Behavior in a Federal Government Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 4, 3 (July 1): 277–318.Google Scholar
Dowbor, Monika. 2012. Arte da institucionalização: estratégias de mobilização dos Sanitaristas (1974–2006). Ph.D. diss., Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Mische, Ann. 1998. What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology 103, 4: 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escola Nacional de Administração Pública. 2015. Servidores públicos federais: perfil, 2015. Brasília: Escola Nacional de Administração Pública.Google Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. 2010. Infiltrating the State: The Evolution of Health Care Reforms in Brazil, 1964–1988. In Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, ed. Mahoney, James and Thelen, Kathleen Ann. New York: Cambridge University Press. 38–62.Google Scholar
Feltran, Gabriel de Santis. 2006. Deslocamentos—trajetorias individuais, relações entre sociedade civil e estado no Brasil. In A disputa pela construção democrática na América Latina, ed. Dagnino, Evelina, Olvera, Alberto J., and Panfichi, Aldo. São Paulo: Paz e Terra. 371–416.Google Scholar
Fillieule, Olivier. 2010. Some Elements of an Interactionist Approach to Political Disengagement. Social Movement Studies 9, 1: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Jeff, and Jasper, James M.. 1999. Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory. Sociological Forum 14: 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierres, Kellen Alves. 2015. Projetos políticos, trajetórias e estratégias: a política de assistência social entre o partido e o estado. Ph.D. diss., Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization 46, 1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Montero, Alfred P.. 2013. The Renewed Developmental State: The National Development Bank and the Brazil Model. Journal of Development Studies 49, 11: 1484–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Keck, Margaret E.. 2007. Greening Brazil: Environmental Activism in State and Society. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBIO). 2014. Unidades de conservação federais e centros de pesquisa e conservação. Website. Brasília: ICMBio/MMA. http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/comunicacao/downloads.html. Accessed September 10, 2014.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans. 1996. The Creativity of Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, Mary C. 2014. Activism Success: A Concept Explication. Master’s thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Herbert. 2006 [1960]. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. 1995. Social Equity and Environmental Politics in Brazil: Lessons from the Rubber Tappers of Acre. Comparative Politics 27, 4: 409–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Brandy. 2014. Unraveling Representative Bureaucracy: A Systematic Analysis of the Literature. Administration & Society 46, 4: 395–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Jan-Erik. 2005. Public Administration and Public Management: The Principal-Agent Perspective. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Thomas B., Suddaby, Roy, and Leca, Bernard. 2009. Introduction: Theorizing and Studying Institutional Work. In Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, ed. Lawrence, Suddaby, and Leca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Young-joo, and Wilkins, Vicky M.. 2011. More Similarities or More Differences? Comparing Public and Nonprofit Managers’ Job Motivations. Public Administration Review 71, 1: 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th anniversary expanded ed. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Losekann, Cristiana. 2009. A presença das organizações ambientalistas da sociedade civil no governo Lula (2003–2007) e as tensões com os setores econômicos. Ph.D. diss., Universidade Federal de Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
Mattos, Luciano Mansor de. 2011. Análise do proambiente como política pública federal para a Amazônia brasileira. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia 28, 3: 721–49.Google Scholar
Maynard-Moody, Steven Williams, and Musheno, Michael Craig. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney G., and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, Sabrina. 2010. Damming the Amazon: Local Movements and Transnational Struggles over Water. Society and Natural Resources 24, 1: 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth John. 1975. Representative Bureaucracy: An Empirical Analysis. American Political Science Review 69, 2: 526–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Kenneth J., and O’Toole, Laurence J.. 2006. Political Control versus Bureaucratic Values: Reframing the Debate. Public Administration Review 66, 2: 177–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melucci, Alberto. 1996. Challenging Codes: Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1952 [1940]. Bureaucratic Structure and Personality. In Reader in Bureaucracy, ed. Merton, Ailsa P. Gray, Hockey, Barbara, and Selvin, Hanan C.. Glencoe: Free Press. 361–71.Google Scholar
Ministério do Meio Ambiente (MMA). 2014. Informes: balanço do programa Bolsa Verde. Programa de apoio à conservação ambiental. Unpublished Powerpoint presentation. Brasília: MMA.Google Scholar
Oberfield, Zachary W. 2014. Becoming Bureaucrats: Socialization at the Front Lines of Government Service. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, Marília Silva de. 2016. Movimento para as instituições: ambientalistas, partidos políticos e a liderança de Marina Silva. Ph.D. diss., University of Brasília.Google Scholar
Olsson, Jan. 2009. The Power of the Inside Activist: Understanding Policy Change by Empowering the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). Planning Theory & Practice 10, 2: 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, Jan. 2016. Subversion in Institutional Change and Stability: A Neglected Mechanism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsson, Jan, and Hysing, Erik. 2012. Theorizing Inside Activism: Understanding Policymaking and Policy Change from Below. Planning Theory & Practice 13, 2: 257–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paiva, Luis Henrique, Falcão, Tiago, and Bartholo, Letícia. 2013. Do Bolsa Família ao Brasil Sem Miséria: um resumo do processo brasileiro recente da busca da superação da pobreza extrema. In Programa Bolsa Família: uma década de inclusão e cidadania, ed. Campello, Tereza and Neri, Marcelo Côrtes. Brasília: IPEA. 25–46.Google Scholar
Pettinicchio, David. 2012. Institutional Activism: Reconsidering the Insider/Outsider Dichotomy. Sociology Compass 6, 6: 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Jessica A. J. 2013. Grassroots Bureaucracy: Intergovernmental Relations and Popular Mobilization in Brazil’s AIDS Policy Sector. Latin American Politics and Society 55, 2: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. 1988. An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences 21, 2: 129–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serafim, Lizandra. 2013. Participação no governo Lula: as pautas da reforma urbana no Ministério das Cidades (2003–2010). Ph.D. diss., Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98, 1: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, Marcelo Kunrath, and de Lima Oliveira, Gerson. 2011. A face oculta (da) dos movimentos sociais: trânsito institucional e intersecção estado-movimento, uma análise do movimento de economia solidária no Rio Grande Do Sul. Sociologias 13, 28: 86–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 1996. States and Opportunities: The Political Structuring of Social Movements. In Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings, ed. McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., and Zald, Mayer N.. New York: Cambridge University Press. 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Tummers, Lars. 2011. Explaining the Willingness of Public Professionals to Implement New Policies: A Policy Alienation Framework. International Review of Administrative Sciences 77, 3: 555–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tummers, Lars, Vermeeren, Brenda, Steijn, Bram, and Bekkers, Victor. 2012. Public Professionals and Policy Implementation: Conceptualizing and Measuring Three Types of Role Conflicts. Public Management Review 14, 8: 1041–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Ralph H. 1952. The Navy Disbursing Officer as a Bureaucrat. In Reader in Bureaucracy, ed. Merton, Robert K., Gray, Ailsa P., Hockey, Barbara, and Selvin, Hanan C.. Glencoe: Free Press. 372–79.Google Scholar
Viana, Rafael Rocha. 2017. Programa Minha Casa Minha Vida—Entidades: um olhar para a ação dos atores em torno das controvérsias. Master’s thesis, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Vilaça, Luiz Henrique Doria. 2017. Costuras, deslocamentos e bricolagens: a atuação de procuradores do Ministério Público Federal no caso de Belo Monte. Master’s thesis, Universidade de Brasília.Google Scholar
Waterman, Richard W., and Meier, Kenneth J.. 1998. Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8, 2: 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar