Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:00:14.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalization and Migration: The Impact of Family Remittances in Latin America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Manuel Orozco
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Taking as its point of departure the relationship between migration and globalization, this article highlights the salience of remittances in the national economies of Latin America, especially Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean. It looks at the various actors that participate in the transfer of remittances and suggests that incorporating migrant labor dynamics as a category of economic integration will reveal a distinct landscape in the economies of Latin America.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , Summer 2002 , pp. 41 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Richard H. 1998. Remittances, Investment, and Rural Asset Accumulation in Pakistan. Economic Development and Cultural Change 47, 1 (October): 155–73.Google Scholar
Arif, Ghulam Mohammad. 1999. Remittances and Investments at the Household Level in Pakistan. Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.Google Scholar
Banco de México. 2001. Informe anual 2000. Mexico City: Banco de México. http:www.banxico.org.mxgPublicacionesFSPublicaciones.html.Google Scholar
Comissión Económica para América Latina (CEPAL). 1999. Información básica del sector agropecuario, subregión norte de América Latina y El Caribe, 1980–1998. Mexico City: United Nations. November 3.Google Scholar
Comissión Económica para América Latina (CEPAL). 2000. Istmo centroamericano: fomento y modernización del sector agroexportador. Mexico City: United Nations. May 12.Google Scholar
Coopers, and Lybrand, . 1997. Non-Bank Financial Institutions: a Study of Five Sectors. New York: Coopers and Lybrand. May. http://www.ustreas.gOv/fincen/cooply.html purpose.Google Scholar
Consulado de México en Chicago. 1998. Base de líderes comunitarios IMCE, junio 1997. Chicago: Instituto Mexicano de Cultura.Google Scholar
Cortes, Michael. 1999. A Statistical Profile of Latino Nonprofit Organizations in the United States. In Nuevos Senderos: Reflections on Hispanics and Philanthropy, ed. Diana, Campoamor, William, A. Díaz, and Henry, A. J. Ramos. Houston: Arte Público Press. 17–54.Google Scholar
De la Garza, Rodolfo, Harry, Pachon, and Manuel, Orozco. 2000. Family Ties and Ethnic Lobbies. In Latinos and U.S. Foreign Policy: Representing the Homeland? ed. De la Garza and Pachon. New York: Rowman and Littlefield. 43–102.Google Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I. 1998. International Security and Democracy: Latin America and the Caribbean in the Post-Cold War Era. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Druckerman, Pamela. 1998. Countries Ready to Issue Bonds Backed by Immigrant Laborers. Wall Street Journal. March 25.Google Scholar
Eekhoff, Katherine. 1997. Las asociaciones salvadoreñas en Los Angeles y su rol para el desarrollo nacional. In Migración internacional y desarrollo, ed. Mario, Lungo. San Salvador, El Salvador: Fundacion Nacional para el Desarrollo. 9–44.Google Scholar
El-Sakka, M. I. T. 1999. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Emigrant Remittances. World Development 27, 8 (August): 1493–1502.Google Scholar
Ferriss, Susan, and Jenalia, Moreno. 1998. Guanajuato's Investment Return: Mexican State Gets a Capital Boost from Emigrants in the U.S. Houston Chronicle. February 26: 1.Google Scholar
García, Xiomara. 2001. Chief, Balance of Payments, Central Bank of El Salvador. Author interview. San Salvador, October 10.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
González Gutiérrez, Carlos, and María Esther, Schumacher. 1998. La cooperatión internacional de Mexico con los mexicano-americanos en Estados Unidos: el caso del PCME. In AMéxico y Estados Unidos: las rutas de la cooperación, ed. Olga, Pellicer and de Castro, Rafael Fernández Mexico City: Instituto Matías Romero. 128–37.Google Scholar
Guerra, R., Carlos, Enrique. 2001. Head of balance of payments office, Central Bank of Guatemala. Author interview. Guatemala City, October 13.Google Scholar
Held, David, and Anthony, McGrew. 1992. Globalization and the Liberal Democratic State. Government and Opposition 28, 2: 261–85.Google Scholar
Hoogvelt, Ankie. 1997. Globalization and the Postcolonial World: The New Political Economy of Development. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Inforpress, . 2000. El Salvador dolariza economia. Guatemala City. Inforpress Cen-troamericana. No. 1396: December 1.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank (IDB). 2000. Basic Socioeconomic Data Report. Washington, Dc: Idb. http://www.iadb.org/int/sta/ENGLISH/staweb/index.htm #bsed.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank. Department of Integration and Regional Programs. 2001. Integration and Trade in the Americas: A Preliminary Estimate of 2001 Trade. Washington, DC: IDB.Google Scholar
La Jornada (Mexico City). 2000. Remesas de migrantes equivalen a 83% de la inversión de Eu en México. October 30.Google Scholar
Kane, Hal. 1995. The Hour of Departure: Forces that Create Refugees and Migrants. Washington: World Watch Institute.Google Scholar
Levitt, Peggy. 1997. Transnationalizing Community Development: the Case of Migration between Boston and the Dominican Republic. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 26, 4: 509–26.Google Scholar
Mahler, Sarah J. 1998. Constructing International Relations: the Role of Transnational Migrants and Other Non-state Actors. Identities 7, 2: 197–232.Google Scholar
Manning, Baylass. 1977. The Congress, the Executive, and Intermestic Affairs. Foreign Affairs 55, 2 (January): 306–24.Google Scholar
Márquez, Rodrigo. 1998. Seminario sobre migración internacional y desarrollo en Norte y Centroamérica. Programa Dos por Uno, Gobierno del Estado de Zacatecas. May.Google Scholar
Mittelman, James H. 2000. The Globalization Syndrome: Transformation and Resistance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Orozco, Manuel. 1998. Distant Brothers: Central Americans in the United States. Hemisphere 8, 3 (Fall): 30–35. Miami: Florida International University.Google Scholar
Orozco, Manuel. 2000a. Remittances and Markets: New Players and Practices. Paper presented to a meeting of the Inter-American Dialogue and Tomas Rivera Policy Institute, Washington, Dc. January 31.Google Scholar
Orozco, Manuel. 2000b. Latino Hometown Associations as Agents of Development in Latin America. Paper presented to a meeting of the Inter-American Dialogue and Tomas Rivera Policy Institute, Washington, Dc. January 31.Google Scholar
Ortiz, Hugo. 1994. Mexico: Data Bank 1994. Mexico City: Inversionista Mexicano.Google Scholar
Prakash, Aseem, and Jeffrey, A. Hart. 2000. Indicators of Economic Integration. Global Governance 6, 1 January-March: 95–104.Google Scholar
Roberts, Bryan, Reanne, Frank, and Fernando, Lozano-Ascencio. 1999. Transnational Migrant Communities and Mexican Migration to the U.S. Ethnic and Racial Studies 22, 2 (March): 238–66.Google Scholar
Romney, Lee. 1999. Credit Unions Link up in Effort to Cut High Cost of Money Transfers. Los Angeles times. April 6: C1.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1996. Losing Control: Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Romney, Lee. 1999. Guests and Aliens. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Stalker, Peter. 2000. Workers Without Frontiers: The Impact of Globalization on International Migration. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Stixrud, William. 1999. U.S. Ambassador to Guatemala. Author interview. Miami. April.Google Scholar
Torres, Federico A. 1998. Uso productivo de las remesas en El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras y Nicaragua. Mexico City: CEPAL. September.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 2001. Human Development Report 2000. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Velásquez, Domenica. 1999. Embajador Stixrud apoya programa de inversión en el país. Prensa Libre (Guatemala City). March.Google Scholar
Werner, Myron. 1995. The Global Migration Crisis: Challenge to State and to Human Rights. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2000. The 2000 World Development Indicators. CD-ROM. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
World Council of Credit Unions. (WCCU). 1999. International Remittance Network. Irnet technical document. Madison, Wi: Wccu. April 29. http://www.wccu.orgprod_servirnetindex.htm.Google Scholar
Zamora, Guadalupe. 1999. State of Guanajuato representative for Casa de Guanajuato program. Author interview. Guanajuato, April.Google Scholar