Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T09:15:10.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Executive-Legislative Deadlocks in the Dominican Republic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Leiv Marsteintredet
Leiv Marsteintredet*
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study analyzes the causes of executive-legislative deadlocks in the Dominican Republic in the period 1978–2005. Deadlocks are considered a pernicious element in (presidential) democracies. The study applies a combination of simple statistical techniques and process tracing to test four institutional hypotheses, which argue that certain institutional and party system constellations increase the probability of deadlocks. The hypotheses point to necessary causes of deadlocks, but their predictions are imprecise. Presidents' persuasive powers and coalition building have helped alleviate the deadlock problem. Analysis of the deadlock periods shows that the additional triggering or sufficient causes for deadlocks are either exogenous to the political institutions or related to the instability of coalitions in the nation's nonideological party system, which consists of three almost equal-sized parties.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , Summer 2008 , pp. 131 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agosto, Gabriela, and Cueto Villamán, Francisco 2001. República Dominicana. In Partidospolíticos de América Latina: Centroamérica, México y República Dominicana, ed. Alcántara Sáez, Manuel and Freidenberg, Flavia Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. 615–98.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil: Interests, Identities, and Institutions in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Botello Fernández, Norge W 2003. PLD. Author interview. Santo Domingo, February 12.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José A. 2002. Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations, and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Comparative Political Studies 35, 3: 284–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José A. 2007. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheibub, José A., Przeworski, Adam, and Sebastian, M. Saiegh. 2004. Government Coalitions and Legislative Success under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science 34: 565–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Adcock, Robert 1999. Democracy and Dichotomies: a Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 537–65.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael 1994. Venezuela: Democratic Despite Presidentialism. In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, ed. Linz, Juan J. and Valen-zuela, Arturo Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 322–49.Google Scholar
Cueto Villamán, Francisco, and Alcántara Sáez, Manuel 2002. Diputados y diputadas de República Dominicana. Actitudes, valores y percepciones políticas. Santo Domingo: Búho.Google Scholar
Darío Espinal, Flavio 2001. Constitucionalismo y procesos políticos en la República Dominicana. Santo Domingo: PUCMM.Google Scholar
Díaz Santana, Juan Bolívar 1996. Trauma electoral. Santo Domingo: Mograf S.A.Google Scholar
Díaz Santanu, Juan Bolívar. 2003a. El intento continuista sacude los viejos simientos del Prd. Hoy (Santo Domingo), May 3.Google Scholar
Díaz Santana, Juan Bolívar. 2003b. Author interview. Santo Domingo, February 4.Google Scholar
Elgie, Robert 2005. From Linz to Tsebelis: Three Waves of Presidential/Parliamentary Studies? Democratization 12, 1: 106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinal, Rosario 1994 [1987]. Autoritarismoy democracia en lapolítica dominicana. 2nd ed. Santo Domingo: Editorial Argumento S.A.Google Scholar
Fernández Mirabal, David. 2003. PLD. Author interview. Santo Domingo, January 1.Google Scholar
Gaceta Oficial. 1978–2006. Legislative data. Nos. 9464–10390.Google Scholar
Gaceta Oficial. 1990. Legislative data, Cámara de Diputados. <http://www.camaradediputados.gov.do/portalsilcamara>..>Google Scholar
GDF Online Database. 2007. Washington, DC: Global Development Finance, World Bank Group. <http://www.worldbank.org>..>Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. BCSIA Studies in International Security. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harmel, Robert, and Janda, Kenneth 1994. An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6, 3: 259–87.Google Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan 1994. Crisis-Ridden Elections (Again) in the Dominican Republic: Neopatrimonialism, Presidentialism, and Weak Electoral Oversight. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 36, 4 (Winter): 91–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartlyn, Jonathan 1998. The Struggle for Democratic Politics in the Dominican Republic. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Jiménez Polanco, Jacqueline. 1999. Los partidos políticos en la República Dominicana. Actividad electoraly desarrollo organizativo. Santo Domingo: Editora Centenario S.A.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark P. 1995. Electoral Laws and the Survival of Presidential Democracies. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Google Scholar
Junta Central Electoral. Various years. Election data. <http://www.jce.do>..>Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1990. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy 1, 1: 51–69.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1994. Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference? In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, ed. Linz, and Valenzuela, Arturo Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Listados Generales. 1990-2002. Legislative data. CD-Rom. Santo Domingo: Cámara de Diputados.Google Scholar
Listín Diario (Santo Domingo). 1998a. December 15.Google Scholar
Listín Diario (Santo Domingo). 1998b. December 23–24.Google Scholar
Listín Diario (Santo Domingo). 2003a. August 15.Google Scholar
Listín Diario (Santo Domingo). 2003b. August 28.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: the Difficult Combination. Comparative Political Studies 26, 2: 198–228.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P. 1984. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review 78, 3: 734–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenghi, Patricia 2001. Anexos. In Partidos políticos de América Latina. Centroamérica, México y República Dominicana, ed. Alcántara Sáez, Manuel and Freidenberg, Flavia Salamanca: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca. 699–725.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1991. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946–1990. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Moya Pons, Frank 2000. Manual de historia dominicana. 12th ed. Santo Domingo: Caribbean Publishers.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 2004. Democratic Politics in Latin America: New Debates and Research Frontiers. Annual Review of Political Science 7: 437–62.Google Scholar
Paniagua, Ruth Helen 20022003. Secretary, Chamber of Deputies. Author interviews, Santo Domingo, various dates.Google Scholar
Peña Gómez, José Francisco 2002 [1970]. Fracaso de la democracia representativa a la luz del derecho constitucional. Santo Domingo: Editora Manatí.Google Scholar
Pérez, César. 2002. República Dominicana: La gobernalidad obstruida por la exclusión política. In Los recursos de la gobernabilidad en la cuenca del Caribe, ed. Dilla Alfonso, H. Caracas: Nueva Sociedad. 207–33.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S., and Carey, John M. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George 1995. Decision-making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science 25: 289–325.Google Scholar