Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:40:56.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Perspective on the Relationships among Cream Paste Ceramic Traditions of Southeastern Mesoamerica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hector Neff ,
James W. Cogswell ,
Laura J. Kosakowsky ,
Francisco Estrada Belli  and
Frederick J. Bove
Hector Neff
Affiliation:
Missouri University Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211.
James W. Cogswell
Affiliation:
Missouri University Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211.
Laura J. Kosakowsky
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215.
Francisco Estrada Belli
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Boston University, 675 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA 02215.
Frederick J. Bove
Affiliation:
ISBER, University of California-Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

New ceramic compositional evidence has come to light that bears on the relationships among the cream paste ceramics of southeastern Mesoamerica. This evidence, which derives from instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) and microprobe analysis, suggests that Ivory ware, a Late and Terminal Formative diagnostic found in southern Guatemala, is chemically similar not to other Guatemalan light firing pottery, but to Formative and Classic period cream paste wares from western El Salvador and Honduras. El Salvador is the clearest region of overlap between the Late Formative (Ivory Usulután) and Classic (Chilanga, Gualpopa, and Copador) representatives of this chemically homogeneous cream paste tradition, and therefore we argue that the source zone for all of them lies somewhere in western El Salvador and not in Honduras or Guatemala. This inference contradicts (1) our own earlier hypothesis that Ivory ware originated somewhere in the Guatemalan highlands and (2) the hypothesis that cream paste Copador originated in the Copán Valley. If this inference is correct, then (1) the importance of ceramic circulation in the Late and Terminal Formative Providencia and Miraflores interaction spheres has been underestimated and (2) during the Classic period, Copán absorbed the productive capacity of western El Salvador (represented in this case by cream paste polychrome pottery) to a greater extent than has been appreciated previously.

Resumen

Resumen

Nuevos datos obtenidos a través de análisis por activación de neutrones y análisis con el “microprobe” han permitido nuevas interpretaciones sobre las relaciones entre varios tipos de cerámica con pasta de color crema del suroriente de Mesoamérica. Esta evidencia sugiere que la vajilla Marfíl, que es diagnóstica del período Formativo Tardío y Terminal del sur de Guatemala, es químicamente semejante no a otras vajillas crema de Guatemala, sino a vajillas de pasta crema del período Clásico de El Salvador y Honduras. Debido a que el occidente de El Salvador es la región donde se translapan más claramente las distribuciones de los representantes Formativos y Clásicos de esta tradición de pasta color crema (Marfil Usulután para el Formativo y Chilanga, Gualpopa, y Copador para el Clásico), creemos que las materias primas se originan en esta región y no en Honduras o Guatemala. Esta inferencia contradice (1) nuestra propia hipótesis sobre la producción de la cerámica Marfil en el altiplano de Guatemala y (2) la hipótesis de que la cerámica polícroma Clásica con pasta crema se produjo en el Valle de Copán. Si esta inferencia fuera correcta, entonces (1) la circulación de vasijas cerámicas durante los períodos Formativo Tardío y Formativo Terminal en las esferas de interacción “Providencia” y “Miraflores” fue más importante que lo que indican las investigaciones anteriores y (2) durante el período Clásico, Copán fue absorbiendo la capacidad de producción del occidente de El Salvador en mayor grado de lo que se había apreciado anteriormente (en este caso la capacidad de producción se representa por la cerámica con pasta crema).

Type
Reports
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 281 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Beaudry, M. P. 1984 Ceramic Production and Distribution in the Southeastern Maya Periphery. Late Classic Painted Serving Vessels. BAR International Series 203. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlo, J. C. 1980 Teotihuacan Art Abroad: A Study of Metropolitan Style and Provincial Transformation in Incensario Workshops. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of History of Art, Yale University, New Haven.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L. 1984 Análisis por activatión de neutrones de la cerámica de El Mirador. Mesoamérica 7:103–111.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L., and Beaudry, M. P. 1994 Appendix B: Chemical Compositional Analysis of Southeastern Maya Ceramics. In Ceramics and Artifacts from Excavations in the Copán Residential Zone, by G. R. Willey, R. M. Leventhal, A. A. Demarest, and W. L. Fash, pp. 407–443. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 80. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L., Beaudry, M. P., Leventhal, R. M., and Sharer, R. J. 1986 Compositional Analysis of Copador and Related Pottery in the Southeast Maya Area. In The Southeast Maya Periphery, edited by P. A. Urban and E. M. Schortman, pp. 143–175. University of Texas Press, Austin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, R. L., Demarest, A. A., and Sharer, R. J. 1989 Chemical Analysis and the Interpretation of Late Pre-classic Intersite Ceramic Patterns in the Southeast Highlands of Mesoamerica. In New Frontiers in the Archaeology of the Pacific Coast of Southern Mesoamerica, edited by F. J. Bove and L. Heller, pp. 135–145. Anthropological Research Papers No. 39. Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L., Harbottle, G., and Sayre, E. V. 1982 Chemical and Mathematical Procedures Employed in the Maya Fine Paste Ceramics Project. In Excavations at Seibal: Analyses of Fine Paste Ceramics, edited by J. A. Sabloff, pp. 272–282. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum, Vol. 15, No. 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L. and Neff, H. 1989 Multivariate Analysis of Compositional Data in Archaeology. Archaeological Chemistry IV, edited by R. O. Allen, pp. 576–86. Advances in Chemistry Series 220. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Bove, F. J. 1993 The Terminal Formative—Early Classic Transition. In The Balberta Project: The Terminal Formative—Early Classic Transition on the Pacific Coast of Guatemala, edited by F. J. Bove, S. Medrano, B. Arroyo, and B. Lou, pp. 177–194. Memoirs in Latin American Archaeology No. 6. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Brew, J. O. 1946 The Archaeology of Alkali Ridge, Southern Utah. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 21. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Chinchilla Mazariegos, O. F. 1996 Settlement Patterns and Monumental Art at a Major Pre-Columbian Polity: Cotzumalguapa, Guatemala. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.Google Scholar
Coggins, C. C. 1988 On the Historical Significance of Decorated Ceramics at Copan and Quiriguá and Related Classic Maya Sites. In The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, edited by E. H. Boone and G. R. WiUey, pp. 95–123. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Demarest, A. A. 1986 The Archaeology of Santa Leticia and the Rise of Maya Civilization. Middle American Research Institute Publication 52. Tulane University, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Demarest, A. A. 1988 Political Evolution in the Maya Borderlands: The Salvadoran Frontier. In The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, edited by E. H. Boone and G. R. WiUey, pp. 335–394. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Demarest, A. A., and Sharer, R. J. 1982 The Origins and Evolution of Usulutan Ceramics. American Antiquity 47:810–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demarest, A. A., and Sharer, R. J. 1986 Late Preclassic Ceramic Spheres, Culture Areas, and Cultural Evolution in the Southeastern Highlands of Mesoamerica. In The Southeast Maya Periphery, edited by P. Urban and E. M. Schortman, pp. 194–223. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Estrada Belli, F., Kosakowsky, L. J., and Wolf, M. 1998 El lugar de Santa Rosa en el mapa arqueológico de Guatemala: desarollo de sociedades complejas en la costa sureste de Guatemala. In XI Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas de Guatemala, edited by J. P. Laporte and H. L. Escobedo. Museo Nacional de Arqueología y Etnología, Guatemala, pp. 319–338.Google Scholar
Gifford, J. 1976 Prehistoric Pottery Analysis and the Ceramics of Barton Ramie in the Belize Valley. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 18. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Glascock, M. D. 1992 Characterization of Archaeological Ceramics at MURR by Neutron Activation Analysis and Multivariate Statistics. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, edited by H. Neff, pp. 11–26. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. 1972 Obsidian Trade Routes in the Mayan Area. Science 178:1092–1093.Google Scholar
Harbottle, G. 1976 Activation Analysis in Archaeology. In Radiochemistry, vol. 3, edited by G. W. A. Newton, pp. 33–72. The Chemical Society, London.Google Scholar
Harbottle, G., Neff, H., and Bishop, R. L. 1994 Appendix C: The Sources of Copán Valley Obsidian. In Ceramics and Artifacts from Excavations in the Copan Residential Zone, by G. R. Willey, R. M. Leventhal, A. A. Demarest, and W. L. Fash, pp. 445–457. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 80. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hatch, M. Popenoe de 1997 Kaminaljuyú/San Jorge: evidencia arqueológico de la actividad económica en el valle de Guatemala, 300 a.C.a 300 d.C. Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City.Google Scholar
Hirth, K. G. 1988 Beyond the Maya Frontier: Cultural Interaction and Syncretism along the Central Honduran Corridor. In The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, edited by E. H. Boone and G. R. Willey, pp. 297–334. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Kosakowsky, L. J., Neff, H., Estrada Belli, F., and Arroyo, B. 1997 Late Preclassic Ceramic Interaction Spheres: The Pacific Coast as Core, Not Periphery. Paper presented at the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Nashville, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Kidder, A. V., Jennings, J. D., and Shook, E. M. 1946 Excavations at Kaminaljuyú, Guatemala. Publication No. 561. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Longyear, J. L. III 1952 Copán Ceramics: A Study of Southeastern Maya Pottery. Publication 597. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Mata Amado, G., and Rubio, R. R. 1987 Incensarios talud-tablero del Lago de Amatitlan, Guatemala. Mesoamérica 13:185–203.Google Scholar
Medrano, S. 1994 Un incensario estilo-teotihuacano de Escuintla. VIII Simposio de Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Guatemala, 1993, pp 131–143. IDEAH and Asociación Tikal, Guatemala.Google Scholar
Neff, H. 1992 Ceramics and evolution. In Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 4, edited by M. B. Schiffer, pp. 141–193. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Neff, H. 1993 Theory, Sampling, and Technical Studies in Archaeological Pottery Analysis. American Antiquity 58:23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, H. 1994 RQ-mode Principal Components Analysis of Ceramic Compositional Data. Archaeometry 36:115–130.Google Scholar
Neff, H. 1995a A Role for “Sourcing” in Evolutionary Archaeology. In Evolutionary Archaeology: Methodological Issues, edited by P. Teltser, pp. 69–112. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Neff, H. 1995b The Development of Plumbate Ceramic Ware in Southern Mesoamerica. JOM 47(3):52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, H., Bishop, R. L., and Arnold, D. E. 1990 A Reexamination of the Compositional Affiliations of Formative Period Whiteware from Highland Guatemala. Ancient Mesoamerica 1:171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, H., Bishop, R. L., and Bove, F. J. 1989 Compositional Patterning in Ceramics from Pacific Coastal and Highland Guatemala. Archeomaterials 3:97–109.Google Scholar
Neff, H., and Bove, F.J. 1999 Mapping Ceramic Compositional Variation and Prehistoric Interaction in Pacific Coastal Guatemala. Proceedings of the 1996 Urbana International Symposium on Archaeometry (Special Issue, Journal of Archaeological Science). In press.Google Scholar
Neff, H., Bove, F. J., Robinson, E., and Arroyo, B. 1994 A Ceramic Compositional Perspective on the Formative to Classic Transition in Southern Mesoamerica. Latin American Antiquity 5:333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, H., and Robinson, E. 1998 Análisis por activación de neutrones de cerámica de pasta blanca de la region Kaqchikel y áreas vecinas en el altiplano guatemalteco. Mesoamérica 35:217–228.Google Scholar
Parsons, L. A. 1967 Bilbao, Guatemala: An Archaeological Study of the Pacific Coast Cotzumalguapa Region, vol. 1. Publications in Anthropology 11. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Parsons, L. A. 1969 Bilbao, Guatemala: An Archaeological Study of the Pacific Coast Cotzumalguapa Region, vol. 2. Publications in Anthropology 12. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M. 1977 Whiteware Pottery Production in the Valley of Guatemala: Specialization and Resource Utilization. Journal of Field Archaeology 4:221–233.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M. 1978 Ceramic Continuity and Change in the Valley of Guatemala. In The Ceramics of Kaminaljuyú, Guatemala, edited by R. K. Wetherington, pp. 511–542. Monograph Series on Kaminaljuyú. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. X, and Michels, J. W. (editors) 1977 Teotihuacán and Kaminaljuyú: A Study in Prehistoric Culture Contact. Monograph Series on Kaminaljuyú. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
Sayre, E. V. 1975 Brookhaven Procedures for Statistical Analysis of Multivariate Archaeometric Data. Manuscript on file, Brookhaven National Laboratory.Google Scholar
Schortman, E. M., and Urban, P. A. 1991 Patterns of Late Preclassic Interaction and the Formation of Complex Society in the Southeast Maya Periphery. In The Formation of Complex Society in Southeastern Mesoamerica, edited by W.R. Fowler Jr., pp. 121–142. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Sharer, R. J. 1978 Pottery and Conclusions. In The Prehistory of Chalchuapa, El Salvador, vol. 3, edited by R. J. Sharer, pp. 1–226. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Sharer, R. J. 1988 Quiriguá as a Classic Maya Center. In The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, edited by E. H. Boone and G. R. Willey, pp. 31–65. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Shook, E. M., and Hatch, M. P. 1978 The Ruins of El Balsamo. Journal of New World Archeology 3(1), whole volume. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Shook, E. M., Hatch, M. P., and Donaldson, J. K. 1979 Ruins of Semetabaj, Dept. Solola, Guatemala. Contributions of the Archaeological Research Facility 41:7–142. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Stark, B. L., Heller, L., Nelson, F. W., Bishop, R. L., Pearsall, D. M., Whitley, D. S., and Wells, H. 1985 El Balsamo Residential Investigations: A Pilot Project and Research Issues. American Anthropologist 87:100–111.Google Scholar
Tschauner, H. 1994 Archaeological Systematics and Cultural Evolution: Retrieving the Honour of Culture History. Man (n.s.) 29:77–93.Google Scholar
Urban, P. A., and Schortman, E. M. 1988 The Southeast Zone Viewed from the East: Lower Motagua-Naco Valleys. In The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, edited by E. H. Boone and G. R. Willey, pp. 223–267. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Viel, R. 1993 Copán Valley. In Pottery of Prehistoric Honduras: Regional Classification and Analysis, edited by J. S. Henderson and M. Beaudry- Corbett, pp. 12–18. Monograph 35. Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, D. 1988 Copán as a Classic Maya Center. In The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, edited by E. H. Boone and G. R. Willey, pp. 5–30. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Wetherington, R. K. 1978a Descriptive Taxonomy of Kaminaljuyú Ceramics. In The Ceramics of Kaminaljuyú, Guatemala, edited by R. K. Wetherington, pp. 3–50. Monograph Series on Kaminaljuyú. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
Wetherington, R. K. 1978b The Ceramic Chronology of Kaminaljuyú. In The Ceramics of Kaminaljuyú, Guatemala, edited by R. K. Wetherington, pp. 51–114. Monograph Series on Kaminaljuyú. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. 1988 The Southeast Classic Maya Zone: A Summary. In The Southeast Classic Maya Zone, edited by E. H. Boone and G. R. Willey, pp. 395–408. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Willey, G. R., Leventhal, R. M., Demarest, A. A., and Fash, W. L. 1994 Ceramics and Artifacts from Excavations in the Copán Residential Zone. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 80. Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Yerima, B. P. K., Calhoun, F. G., Senkayi, A. L., and Dixon, J. B. 1985 Occurrence of Interstratified Kaolinite-Smectite in El Salvador Vertisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49:462–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar