Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:41:40.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating the Distributional Approach to Inferring Marketplace Exchange: A Test Case from the Mexican Gulf Lowlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christopher P. Garraty
Christopher P. Garraty*
Affiliation:
School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-2402 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over a decade ago Kenneth Hirth (1998, 2000) developed a “distributional approach” for archaeologically inferring the existence of marketplace exchange based on analyses of domestic artifact collections. Domestic collections, he reasoned, will be relatively homogeneous in areas where most or all households rely on marketplace exchange to acquire domestic provisions. The present study evaluates Hirth’s distributional approach using a statistical measure of diversity (heterogeneity) to quantify variability among domestic collection units over a large area. The data for this study come from the Middle Postclassic lower Blanco region of Veracruz (A.D. 1200–A.D. 1350), an unknown context of marketplace exchange. A comparison of diversity scores calculated on surface sherd collections from the lower Blanco region with scores from Late Postclassic Teotihuacan (A.D. 1350–A.D. 1520)—a known context of marketplace exchange—suggests the existence of a marketplace exchange system in the lower Blanco region, likely centered at the town of El Sauce. In addition, changes in intercollection diversity (sherds) and obsidian concentrations with increasing distance from the center suggest El Sauce’s market service area encompassed a radius of approximately six to nine kilometers.

Casi hace una década Kenneth Hirth (1998, 2000) desarrolló su “método distribucional” para deducir arqueológicamente la existencia del intercambio de mercado basada en análisis de las ensambladuras domésticas de artefactos. Las ensambladuras domésticas son relativamentes homogéneos en lugares donde la mayoría de las unidades domésticas dependen del intercambio de mercado para obtener las provisiones domésticas. Este estudio evalúa el método distribucional usando una técnica estadística de diversidad para cuantificar variabilidad entre las ensambladuras domésticas a través de un área grande. Específicamente, se trata de variabilidad entre las ensambladuras de la region del bajo Río Blanco en Veracruz, un contexto desconocido del intercambio de mercado, durante el período posclásico medio (1200–1350 d. C). Una comparación de las estadísticas el período posclásico tarde (1350–1520 d. C), un contexto conocido del intercambio de mercado, sugiere la existencia de intercambio de mercado en la región del bajo Río Blanco, centrada probablemente en el centro de El Sauce. Además, patrones de cambiar en las estadísticas de diversidad y en las concentraciones de obsidiana con el aumento de la distancia del centro sugieren que la área de servicio del mercado abarcara un radio de seis a nueve kilómetros.

Type
Part 2: Themed Section on Mesoamerica
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 157 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Society for American Archaeology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Abbott, David R. 2000 Ceramics and Community Organization among the Hohokam. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Blanton, Richard E. 1996 The Basin of Mexico Market System and the Growth of Empire. In Aztec Imperial Strategies, coauthored by Frances F. Berdan, Richard E. Blanton, Elizabeth Hill Boone, Mary G. Hodge, Michael E. Smith, and Emily Umberger, pp. 47–84. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington D.C. Google Scholar
Blanton, Richard E. 1998 Comment on Hirth. Current Anthropology 39:463–464.Google Scholar
Bohannan, Paul, and Dalton, George 1962 Introduction. In Markets in Africa, edited by Paul Bohannan and George Dalton, pp. 1–26. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
Boone, James L. III 1987 Defining and Measuring Midden Catchment. American Antiquity 52:336–345.Google Scholar
Brainerd, George W. 1951 The Place of Chronological Ordering in Archaeological Analysis. American Antiquity 16:301–313.Google Scholar
Carrasco, Pedro 1998 Comment on Hirth. Current Anthropology 39:464–465.Google Scholar
Curet, L. Antonio 1993 Regional Studies and Ceramic Production Areas: An Example from La Mixtequilla, Veracruz. Journal of Field Archaeology 20:427–440.Google Scholar
Curet, L. Antonio, Stark, Barbara L., and Sergio Vasquez, Z. 1994 Postclassic Changes in Veracruz, Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica 5:13–32.Google Scholar
Garraty, Christopher P. 2000 Ceramic Indices of Aztec Eliteness. Ancient Mesoamerica 11:323–340.Google Scholar
Garraty, Christopher P. 2006a Aztec Teotihuacan: Political Processes at a Post-classic and Early Colonial City-State in the Basin of Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 17:363–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garraty, Christopher P. 2006b The Politics of Commerce: Aztec Pottery Production and Exchange in the Basin of Mexico, A.D. 1200-1650. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Garraty, Christopher P., and Stark, Barbara L. 2002 Imperial and Social Relations in Postclassic South-central Veracruz. Latin American Antiquity 13:3–33.Google Scholar
Hassig, Ross 1998 Comment on Hirth. Current Anthropology 39:467.Google Scholar
Heller, Lynette 2000 Postclassic Obsidian Workshop Debris from El Sauce, Veracruz, Mexico. Mexicon XXII: 139–146.Google Scholar
Heller, Lynnette, and Stark, Barbara L. 1998 Classic and Postclassic Obsidian Tool Production and Consumption: A Regional Perspective from the Mixtequilla, Veracruz. Mexicon XX: 119–128.Google Scholar
Hicks, Frederic 1987 First Steps Towards a Market-Integrated Economy in Aztec Mexico. In Early State Dynamics, edited by Henri Claessen and Pieter van de Velde, pp. 91–07. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
Hicks, Frederic 1998 Comment on Hirth. Current Anthropology 39:467–468.Google Scholar
Hirth, Kenneth G. 1998 The Distributional Approach: A New Way to Identify Marketplace exchange in the Archaeological Record. Current Anthropology 39:451–476.Google Scholar
Hirth, Kenneth G. 2000 Ancient Urbanism at Xochicalco: The Evolution and Organization of a Pre-Hispanic Society. Archaeological Research at Xochicalco, Vol. 1. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G., and Mine, Leah D. 1990 The Spatial Patterning of Aztec Ceramics: Implications for Prehispanic Exchange Systems in the Valley of Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 17:415–437.Google Scholar
Hodge, Mary G., and Mine, Leah D. 1991 Aztec-Period Ceramic Distribution and Exchange Systems. Final Report Submitted to the National Science Foundation for Grant BSM-8704177, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Johnson, Gregory A. 1977 Aspects of Regional Analysis in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 6:479–508.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W. 1984 Measuring Archaeological Diversity by Comparison with Simulated Assemblages. American Antiquity 49:44–54.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W. 1989 Sample Size, Significance, and Measures of Diversity. In Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology, edited by Robert D. Leonard and George T. Jones, pp. 25–36. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kintigh, Keith W. 2002 Tools for Quantitative Archaeology: Programs for Quantitative Analysis in Archaeology. Programs manual published by the author, Tempe. Electronic document. http://tfqa.com, accessed January 27, 2009.Google Scholar
Kohler, Timothy A., and Blinman, Eric 1987 Solving Mixture Problems in Archaeology: Analysis of Ceramic Materials for Dating. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, Donald V. 1974 Peripheral and Transitional Markets: The Aztec Case. American Ethnologist 1:685–705.Google Scholar
Lanata, José Luis 1996 La diversidad instrumental en el sudeste fueguino. Arqueología 6:159–197.Google Scholar
Leonard, Robert D., and Jones, George T. (editors) 1989 Quantifying Diversity in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Magurran, Anne E. 1988 Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Magurran, Anne E. 2004 Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell, Maiden, MA. Google Scholar
Millon, René 1973 Urbanization at Teotihuacan, Mexico: The Teotihuacan Map, Part 1: Text, Vol. 1. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Millon, René, Drewitt, R. Bruce, and Cowgill, George L. 1973 Urbanization at Teotihuacan, Mexico: The Teotihuacan Map, Part 2: Maps, Vol. 1. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Mine, Leah D. 1994 Political Economy and Market Economy Under Aztec Rule: A Regional Perspective Based on Decorated Ceramic Production and Distribution Systems in the Valley of Mexico. 2 vols. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Mine, Leah D. 2006 Monitoring Regional Market Systems in Prehistory: Models, Methods, and Metrics. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 25:82–116.Google Scholar
Nichols, Deborah L., Brumfiel, Elizabeth M., Neff, Hector, Hodge, Mary G., Charlton, Thomas H., and Glascock, Michael D. 2002 Neutrons, Markets, Cities, and Empires: A 1000-Year Perspective on Ceramic Production and Distribution in the Postclassic Basin of Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 21:25–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, Evelyn C. 1975 Ecological Diversity. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Pielou, Evelyn C. 1977 Mathematical Ecology. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Plattner, Stuart 1989 Markets and Marketplaces. In Economic Anthropology, edited by Stuart Plattner, pp. 171–208. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Plunkett, Patricia 1998 Comment on Hirth. Current Anthropology 39:468–469.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl 2001 [1944] The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
Pryor, Frederic L. 1977 The Origins of the Economy: A Comparative Study of Distribution in Primitive and Peasant Economies. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin 1975 Trade as Action at a Distance. In Ancient Civilization and Trade, edited by Jeremy A. Sabloff and Carl C. Lamberg-Karlovsky, pp. 3–59. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Rice, Glen E., Simon, Arleyn W., and Loendorf, Christopher 1998 Production and Exchange of Economic Goods. In A Synthesis of Tonto Basin Prehistory: The Roosevelt Archaeology Studies, 1989 to 1998, edited by Glen E. Rice, pp. 105–130. Anthropological Field Studies 41. Arizona State University Office of Cultural Resource Management, Tempe.Google Scholar
Robinson, George 1951 A Method of Chronologically Ordering Archaeological Deposits. American Antiquity 16:293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall 1972 Stone Age Economics. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Smith, Carol A. 1972 Market Articulation and Economic Stratification in Western Guatemala. Food Research Institute Studies in Agricultural Economics, Trade, and Development 11:203–233.Google Scholar
Smith, Carol A. 1974 Economics of Marketing Systems: Models from Economic Geography. Annual Review of Anthropology 3:167–201.Google Scholar
Smith, Carol A. 1976 Regional Economic Systems: Linking Geographical Models and Socioeconomic Problems. In Regional Analysis: Economic Systems, Vol. 1. edited by Carol A. Smith, pp. 3–63. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael E. 1999 On Hirth’s “Distributional Approach.” Current Anthropology 40:528–530.Google Scholar
Speaker, J. Stuart 2001 Settlement and Agricultural Land Use in Ancient Mixtequilla, Veracruz, Mexico. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Tulane University New Orleans, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael W. 1985 Specialized Production in Rural Aztec Society. In Contributions to the Archaeology and Ethnohistory of Greater Mesoamerica, edited by William Folan, pp. 77–125. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara L. 1991 Survey Methods and Settlement Features in the Cerro de las Mesas Region. In Settlement Archaeology of Cerro de las Mesas, edited by Barbara L. Stark, pp. 39–48. Monograph 34. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara L. 1992 Ceramic Production in La Mixtequilla, Veracruz, Mexico. In Ceramic Production and Distribution: An Integrated Approach, edited by George J. Bey, III, and Christopher Pool, pp. 175–204. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara L. 1995 Introducción a la alfarería del postclásico en La Mixtequilla, sur-centro de Veracruz. Arqueología 13–14:17–36.Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara L. 2006 Systematic Regional Survey in the Gulf Lowlands in a Comparative Perspective. In Managing Archaeological Data: Essays in Honor of Sylvia W. Gaines, edited by Jeffrey L. Hantman and Rachel Most, pp. 155–167. Anthropological Research Papers 57. Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara L., and Garraty, Christopher P. 2004 Evaluation of Systematic Surface Evidence for Pottery Production in Veracruz, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 15:123–143.Google Scholar
Wanmali, Sudhir 1981 Periodic Markets and Rural Development in India. B. R. Publishing, Delhi.Google Scholar
Wilk, Richard 1998 Comment on Hirth. Current Anthropology 39:469.Google Scholar