Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T23:26:08.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE ECONOMY OF SPECIALIZED CERAMIC CRAFT PRODUCTION IN THE CASAS GRANDES REGION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2017

John R. Topi ,
Christine S. VanPool ,
Kyle D. Waller  and
Todd L. VanPool
John R. Topi*
Affiliation:
Swallow Department 202, Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Christine S. VanPool
Affiliation:
Swallow Department 202, Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Kyle D. Waller
Affiliation:
Swallow Department 202, Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Todd L. VanPool
Affiliation:
Swallow Department 202, Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
*
([email protected], corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent analyses use geometric morphometrics (GM), the quantitative study of shape and its variation, to examine aspects of the archaeological record. Our research builds on such applications to examine the organization of production by applying GM analysis to whole ceramic vessels from the Casas Grandes culture of northwest Mexico. We quantify variation in vessel shape and size and conclude that specialists made at least some of the Ramos and Babicora Polychromes, but that the other Casas Grandes ceramic types were generally made by nonspecialists. This bolsters arguments for Medio period (AD 1200 to 1450) specialized production above the household level but indicates that specialized production was limited to a subset of economically valuable goods. We further suggest some Ramos Polychrome was made by attached specialists associated with elites at Paquime, the religious center of the Medio period, whereas some Babicora Polychrome was made by independent specialists. The analysis contributes to three important anthropological topics: (1) the study of the Medio period Casas Grandes culture, and by extension the organization of production in mid-level hierarchically organized societies; (2) geometric morphometric analysis of archaeological collections; and (3) the Standardization Hypothesis and the relationship between artifact standardization and the organization of production.

Análisis recientes utilizan la morfometría geométrica (MG), entendida como el estudio cuantitativo de la forma y su variación, para examinar aspectos del registro arqueológico. Nuestra investigación se basa en este método mediante su aplicación en el análisis de vasijas cerámicas de la cultura Casas Grandes del noroeste de México, con el objetivo de evaluar la organización de su producción. Cuantificamos la variación en tamaño y forma de las vasijas, y concluimos que probablemente los estilos polícromos Ramos y Babicora fueron hechos por alfareros especializados, mientras que los otros tipos de cerámica de Casas Grandes no habrían sido realizados por especialistas. Esto refuerza los argumentos de la producción especializada durante el período Medio (1200 a 1450 dC), por encima del nivel doméstico, pero indica que la producción especializada se limitó a objetos económicamente valiosos. Además, sugerimos que la cerámica Ramos Polícroma fue elaborada por especialistas asociados con las élites de Paquimé, el centro religioso del período Medio, mientras que la cerámica Babicora Polícroma fue hecha por especialistas independientes. El análisis llevado a cabo contribuye a la discusión de al menos tres temas antropológicos importantes: (1) el estudio de la cultura de Casas Grandes durante el período Medio y, en consecuencia, de la organización de la producción en las sociedades jerarquizadas de nivel medio; (2) el análisis morfométrico de las colecciones arqueológicas; y (3) la hipótesis de la normalización y la relación entre la estandarización de artefactos y la organización de la producción de vasijas.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 122 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by the Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bagwell, Elizabeth A. 2006 Domestic Architectural Production in Northwestern Mexico. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Brand, Donald D. 1935 The Distribution of Pottery Types in Northwest Mexico. American Anthropologist 37:287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Briggs, O'Brien, Michael J., and Collard, Mark 2014 Continent-Wide or Region-Specific? A Geometric Morphometrics-Based Assessment of Variation in Clovis Point Shape. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 6:145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, John P. 2002 The Animas Phase and Paquime Regional Differentiation and Integration at Joyce Well. In The Joyce Well Site: On the Frontier of the Casas Grandes World, edited by Skibo, James M., McCluney, Eugene B., and Walker, William H., pp. 149–166. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Costin, Cathy Lynne 1991 Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production. In Archaeological Method and Theory: Volume 3, edited by Schiffer, Michael B., pp. 1–56. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Costin, Cathy Lynne 2015 Craft Specialization. International Encyclopedia of Human Sexuality 1–5. Electronic document, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs106/abstract, accessed January 28, 2017.Google Scholar
Costin, Cathy L., and Hagstrum, Melissa B. 1995 Standardization, Labor Investment, Skill, and the Organization of Ceramic Production in Late Prehispanic Highland Peru. American Antiquity 60:619–639.Google Scholar
Crown, Patricia L. 1995 The Production of the Salado Polychromes in the American Southwest. In Ceramic Production in the American Southwest, edited by Mills, Barbara J. and Crown, Patricia L., pp. 142–166. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Crown, Patricia L. 2007 Life Histories of Pots and Potters: Situating the Individual in Archaeology. American Antiquity 72:677–690.Google Scholar
Cruz Antillón, Rafael, Leonard, Robert D., Maxwell, Timothy D., VanPool, Todd L., Harmon, Marcel J., VanPool, Christine S., Hyndman, David A., and Brandwein, Sidney S 2004 Galeana, Villa Ahumada, and Casa Chica: Diverse Sites in the Casas Grandes Region. In Surveying the Archaeology of Northwest Mexico, edited by Newell, Gillian E. and Gallaga, Emiliano, pp. 149–176. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Di Peso, Charles C. 1974 Casas Grandes: A Fallen Trading Center of the Gran Chichimeca, Vols. 1–3. Amerind Foundation, Dragoon, Arizona; Northland Press, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Di Peso, Charles C., Rinaldo, John B., and Fenner, Gloria J. 1974 Casas Grandes: A Fallen Trading Center of the Gran Chichimeca, Vols. 4–7. Amerind Foundation, Dragoon, Arizona; Northland Press, Flagstaff, Arizona.Google Scholar
Gamboa, Eduardo 2002 Casas Grandes Culture. In Talking Birds, Plumed Serpents, and Painted Women: The Ceramics of Casas Grandes, edited by Stuhr, Joanne, pp. 41–43. Tucson Museum of Art and Historic Block, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, Mitch J. 2003 Design Analysis of Chihuahuan Polychrome Jars from North American Museum Collections. Archaeopress, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, Jane H., and Searcy, Michael T. 2015 The Viejo Period. In Ancient Paquime and the Casas Grandes World, Chihuahua, Mexico, edited by Minnis, Paul E. and Whalen, Michael E., pp. 17–40. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, David G., and Kendall, Wilfrid S. 1980 Alignments in Two-Dimensional Random Sets of Points. Advances in Applied Probability 12:380–424.Google Scholar
Larkin, Karin Burd, Kelley, Jane H., and Hendrickson, Mitchel J. 2004 Ceramics as Temporal and Spatial Indicators in Chihuahua Cultures. In Surveying the Archaeology of Northwest Mexico, edited by Newell, Gillian E. and Gallaga, Emiliano, pp. 177–204. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Lekson, Stephen H. 2002 Salado Archaeology of the Upper Gila, New Mexico. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathiowetz, Michael 2011 The Diurnal Path of the Sun: Ideology and Interregional Interaction in Ancient Northwest Mesoamerica and the American Southwest. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
Miloglav, Ina 2013 A Model of Ceramic Production, Specialization and Standardization of Ceramic Assemblages on the Basis of Two Sites of the Vučedol Culture in Eastern Croatia. Anthropologie 51:195–211.Google Scholar
Perez, Ivan S., Bernal, Valeria, and Gonzalez, Paula N. 2006 Differences between Sliding Semi-Landmark Methods in Geometric Morphometrics, with an Application to Human Craniofacial and Dental Variation. Journal of Anatomy 6:769–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, David A. Jr., and VanPool, Christine S. 2009 Seeking the Individual in Casas Grandes Pottery: A Progress Report. Pottery Southwest 28 (3):10–16 Google Scholar
Rakita, Gordon F. M. 2009 Ancestors and Elites: Emergent Complexity and Ritual Practices in the Casas Grandes Polity. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Rakita, Gordon F. M., and Cruz Antillón, Rafael 2015 Organization of Production at Paquime. In Ancient Paquime and the Casas Grandes World, edited by Minnis, Paul E. and Whalen, Michael E., pp. 58–82. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakita, Gordon F. M., and Raymond, Gerry R. 2003 The Temporal Sensitivity of Casas Grandes Polychrome Ceramics. Kiva 68:153–184.Google Scholar
Riley, Carol L. 1987 The Frontier People: The Greater Southwest in the Protohistoric Period. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Riley, Carol L. 2005 Becoming Aztlan: Mesoamerican Influences in the Greater Southwest (A.D. 1200–1500). University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Robb, John E. 1998 The Archaeology of Symbols. Annual Review of Anthropology 27:329–346.Google Scholar
Roux, Valentine 2003 Ceramic Specialization and Intensity of Production: Quantifying Degrees of Specialization. American Antiquity 68:768–782.Google Scholar
Sayles, Edwin B. 1936 Some Southwestern Pottery Types, Series V. Medallion Papers 21. Gila Pueblo, Globe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Searcy, Michael T. 2010 Symbols and Sociopolitical Organization: Mesoamerican Iconography in the US Southwest/Northwest Mexico. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman.Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O. 1956 Ceramics for the Archaeologist. Publication 609. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Skibo, James M., McCluney, Eugene B., and Walker, William H. 2002 The Joyce Well Site: On the Frontier of the Casas Grandes World. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Sprehn, Maria S. 2003 Social Complexity and the Specialist Potters of Casas Grandes in Northern Mexico. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Swanson, Steve 2003 Documenting Prehistoric Communications Networks: A Case Study in the Paquime Polity. American Antiquity 68:735–767.Google Scholar
VanPool, Christine S. 2003 The Symbolism of Casas Grandes. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
VanPool, Christine S., Rakita, Gordon F. M., Cruz Antillón, Rafael, and Leonard, Robert D. 2008 Field Guide to the Ceramic Types of the Casas Grandes Region. In Touching the Past: Ritual, Religion, and Trade of Casas Grandes, edited by Nielsen-Grimm, Glenna and Stavast, Paul, pp. 59–67. Museum of Peoples and Cultures, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.Google Scholar
VanPool, Christine S., and VanPool, Todd L. 2002 Dichotomy and Duality: The Structure of Casas Grandes Art. In Talking Birds, Plumed Serpents, and Painted Women: The Ceramics of Casas Grandes, edited by Stuhr, Joanne, pp. 71–75. Tucson Museum of Art and Historic Block, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
VanPool, Christine S., and VanPool, Todd L. 2007 Signs of the Casas Grandes Shamans. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
VanPool, Christine S., VanPool, Todd L., and Downs, Lauren 2017 Dressing the Person: Clothing and Identity in the Casas Grandes World. American Antiquity 82:262–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanPool, Todd L., Kircher, Kenneth W., VanPool, Christine S., and Rakita, Gordon F. M. 2017 Social Interaction, Social Status, and the Organization of Medio Period Craft Production as Evidenced in Ground Stone Artifacts from 76 Draw. Lithic Technology 42:77–89.Google Scholar
VanPool, Todd L., and Leonard, Robert D. 2002 Specialized Ground Stone Production in the Casas Grandes Region of Northern Chihuahua, Mexico. American Antiquity 67:710–730.Google Scholar
VanPool, Todd L., and Leonard, Robert D. 2011 Quantitative Analysis in Archaeology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
VanPool, Todd L., Oswald, Christopher M., Christy, Jason A., Ferguson, Jeffrey R., Rakita, Gordon F. M., and VanPool, Christine S. 2013 Provenance Studies of Obsidian at 76 Draw. In Advances in Jornada Mogollon Archaeology: Proceedings from the 17th Jornada Mogollon Conference, edited by VanPool, Todd L., McCarthy, Elizabeth M., and VanPool, Christine S., pp. 185–194. El Paso Museum of Anthropology, El Paso, Texas.Google Scholar
VanPool, Todd L., and VanPool, Christine S. 2016 Animating Architecture and the Assembly of an Elite City: Birth and Dedication of Nonhuman Persons at Paquime, Chihuahua, Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Research 72:311–336.Google Scholar
Webster, Mark, and David Sheets, H. 2010 A Practical Introduction to Landmark-Based Geometric Morphometrics. In Quantitative Methods in Paleobiology, Paleontological Society Papers Vol. 16, edited by Alroy, John and Hunt, Gene, pp. 163–188. Paleontological Society, Bethesda, Maryland.Google Scholar
Whalen, Michael E., and Minnis, Paul E. 2001 The Casas Grandes Regional System: A Late Prehistoric Polity of Northwestern Mexico. Journal of World Prehistory 15:313–364.Google Scholar
Whalen, Michael E., and Minnis, Paul E. 2009 The Neighbors of Casas Grandes: Excavating Medio Period Communities of Northwest Chihuahua, Mexico. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Whalen, Michael E., and Minnis, Paul E. 2012 Ceramics and Polity in the Casas Grandes Area, Chihuahua, Mexico. American Antiquity 77:403–423.Google Scholar
Whalen, Michael E., and Pitezel, Todd 2015 Settlement Patterns of the Casas Grandes Area. In Ancient Paquime and the Casas Grandes World, edited by Minnis, Paul E. and Whalen, Michael E., pp. 103–125. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilczek, Josef, Monna, Fabrice, Barral, Philippe, Burlet, Laure, Chateau, Carmela, and Navarro, Nicolas 2014 Morphometrics of Second Iron Age Ceramics—Strengths, Weaknesses, and Comparison with Traditional Typology. Journal of Archaeological Science 50:39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woosley, Anne I., and Olinger, Bart 1993 The Casas Grandes Ceramic Tradition: Production and Interregional Exchange of Ramos Polychrome. In Culture and Contact: Charles C. Di Peso's Gran Chichimeca, edited by Woosley, Anne I. and Ravesloot, John C., pp. 105–131. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Zelditch, Miriam Leah, Swiderski, Donald L., and David Sheets, H. 2012 Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. 2nd ed. Elsevier, Waltham, Massachusetts.Google Scholar