Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:59:55.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Formative Pottery from the Tuxtla Mountains and Implications for Gulf Olmec Origins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Philip J. Arnold III
Philip J. Arnold III*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 N. Sheridan, Chicago, IL 60626
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores patterning in ceramic data from an Early Formative component at the site of La Joya, located in southern Veracruz, Mexico. The discussion uses ceramic paste characteristics, in addition to vessel form and decoration data, to suggest that this Early Formative pottery assemblage undergoes an in situ transformation between the “pre-Olmec” Tulipan phase and the “Olmec” Coyame phase. This conclusion is then used to revisit the hypothesis of a Chicharras phase (ca. 1250 B.C.) immigration of Pacific coastal groups into the southern Gulf lowlands (e.g., Clark 1990, 1997; Clark and Blake 1989; Coe and Diehl 1980). A consideration of ceramics from several Isthmian lowland contexts does not support this scenario. The discussion suggests that an over-reliance on the surface characteristics of ceramics at San Lorenzo may have encouraged an erroneous Gulf Olmec origin story.

Resumen

Resumen

En este artículo se presentan datos cerámicos que pertenecen a la ocupación Formativa Temprana del sitio de La Joya, ubicado en el sur de Veracruz, México. Esta discusión enfatiza las características de la pasta de los tiestos, así como los atributos de forma y decoración, como instrumentos útiles para investigar los cambios en el conjunto cerámico durante la transición entre la fase Tulipan (“pre-olmeca”) y la fase Coyame (“olmeca”). Este análisis indica que los cambios no fueron abruptos y sugiere que la transformación cerámica representa un proceso in situ. En vista de esta conclusión, se reconsidera el hipótesis de una inmigración a la Costa del Golfo durante el comienzo de la fase Chicharras (ca. 1250 a.C.), propuesto originalmente por Coe y Diehl (1980) y también fomentado por Clark (1990 1997; Clark y Blake 1989). Los patrones cerámicos encontrados en La Joya y otros sitios del llano costero no soportan este modelo de inmigración. La discusión indica que el énfasis en las características de la superficie de la cerámica no sirve bien a los esfuerzos arqueológicos en la Costa del Golfo, principalmente por el mal estado de preservación en que se encuentra la mayoría del material cerámico.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 29 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by the Society for American Archaeology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Arnold, Dean E. 1985 Ceramic Theory and Cultural Process. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arnold, Philip J. III 1991 Domestic Ceramic Production and Spatial Organization: A Mexican Case Study in Ethnoarchaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arnold, Philip J. III 1999 Tecomates, Residential Mobility, and Early Formative Occupation in Coastal Lowland Mesoamerica. In Pottery and People: A Dynamic Interaction, edited by James M. Skibo and Gary M. Feinman, pp. 159–170. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Arnold, Philip J. III 2000 Sociopolitical Complexity and the Gulf Olmecs: A View from the Tuxtla Mountains, Veracruz, Mexico. In Olmec Art and Archaeology in Mesoamerica, edited by John E. Clark and Mary E. Pye, pp. 117–135. National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Arnold, Philip J. III 2001 Ceramic Production at La Joya, Veracruz: Early Formative Techno-Logics and Error Loads. Manuscript on file, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Loyola University Chicago.Google Scholar
Arnold, Philip J. III, and McCormack, Valerie J. 2002 En la Sombra del San Martín: Final Field Report of the La Joya Archaeological Project. Report submitted to the Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
Arnold, Philip J. III, and Pohlman, Lenora 1999 Gulf Olmec Occupation and Variation at La Joya, Veracruz, Mexico. Paper presented at the 64th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bernal, Ignacio 1969 The Olmec World. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Blake, Michael, Chisholm, Brian S., Clark, John E., Voorhies, Barbara, and Love, Michael W. 1992 Prehistoric Subsistence in the Soconusco Region. Current Anthropology 33:83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Michael, Clark, John E., Voorhies, Barbara, Michaels, George, Love, Michael W., Pye, Mary E., Demarest, Arthur A., and Arroyo, Barbara 1995 Radiocarbon Chronology for the Late Archaic and Formative Periods on the Pacific Coast of Southeastern Mesoamerica. Ancient Mesoamerica 6:161–183.Google Scholar
Clark, John E. 1990 Olmecas, olmequismo, y olmequización en Mesoamérica. Arqueología (segunda época) 3:49–57.Google Scholar
Clark, John E. 1991 The Beginning of Mesoamerica: Apologia for the Soconusco Early Formative. In The Formation of Complex Society, edited by William R. Fowler, pp. 13–26. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
Clark, John E. 1997 The Arts of Government in Early Mesoamerica. Annual Review of Anthropology 26:211–234.Google Scholar
Clark, John E., and Blake, Michael 1989 El origen de la civilizatión en Mesoamérica: Los Olmecas y Mokaya del Soconusco de Chiapas, México. In Elpreclásico oformativo: Avances yperspectivas, edited by Maria Carmona Macias, pp. 385–403. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
Coe, Michael D., and Diehl, Richard A. 1980 The Archaeology of San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán. In In the Land of the Olmec, vol. 1. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Cyphers, Ann (editor) 1997 Población, subsistencia y medio ambiente en San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán. Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F. Google Scholar
Diehl, Richard A., and Coe, Michael D. 1995 Olmec Archaeology. In The Olmec World: Ritual and Rulership, edited by Michael D. Coe, pp. 11–25. The Art Museum, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Drucker, Philip D. 1952 La Venta, Tabasco: A Study of Olmec Ceramics and Art. Smithsonian Institution, Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 153. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V, and Marcus, Joyce 1994 Early Formative Pottery of the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, No. 27. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V, and Marcus, Joyce 2000 Formative Mexican Chiefdoms and the Myth of the “Mother Culture.” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 19:1–37.Google Scholar
Goman, Michelle 1992 Paleoecological Evidence for Prehistoric Agriculture and Tropical Forest Clearance in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Geography, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley.Google Scholar
González Lauck, Rebecca B. 2000 La zona del Golfo en el preclásico: La etapa olmeca. In El México antiguo, sus áreas culturales, los orígenes y el horizonte preclásico, edited by Linda Manzanilla and L. Lopez Luján, pp. 363–406. 2nd ed. Historia Antigua de México, vol. I, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México, D.F. Google Scholar
Grove, David C. 1997 Olmec Archaeology: A Half Century of Research and Its Accomplishments. Journal of World Prehistory 11:51–101.Google Scholar
Lee, Thomas A. Jr. 1989 Chiapas and the Olmec. In Regional Perspectives on the Olmec, edited by Robert J. Sharer and David C. Grove, pp. 198–226. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lesure, Richard G. 1998a Vessel Form and Function in an Early Formative Ceramic Assemblage from Coastal Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 25:19–36.Google Scholar
Lesure, Richard G. 1998b Refining an Early Formative Ceramic Sequence from the Chiapas Coast of Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica 9:67–81.Google Scholar
Lowe, Gareth W. 1989 The Heartland Olmec: Evolution of Material Culture. In Regional Perspectives on the Olmec, edited by Robert J. Sharer and David C. Grove, pp. 33–67. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
McCormack, Valerie J. 2002 Sedentism, Site Occupation, and Settlement Organization at La Joya, a Formative Village in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Ortiz C, Ponciano, María del Carmen Rodríguez, M., and Alfredo, Delgado C. 1997 Las investigaciones arqueológicas en el Cerro Sagrado Manatí. Universidad Veracruzana and El Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Xalapa, Veracruz.Google Scholar
Pool, Christopher A., and Britt, Georgia M. 2000 A Ceramic Perspective on the Formative to Classic Transition in Southern Veracruz, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 11:139–161.Google Scholar
Pool, Christopher A., and Santley, Robert S. 1992 Middle Classic Pottery Economics in the Tuxtla Mountains, Southern Veracruz, Mexico. In Ceramic Production and Distribution: An Integrated Approach, edited by George J. Bey III and Christopher A. Pool, pp. 205–234. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Raab, L. Mark, Boxt, Matthew A., Bradford, Katherine, Stokes, Brian A., and González Lauck, Rebecca B. 2000 Testing at Isla Alor in the La Venta Olmec Hinterland. Journal of Field Archaeology 27:257–270.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Bently K. 1991 Volcanology of the Younger Volcanic Sequence and Volcanic Hazards Study of the Tuxtla Volcanic Field, Veracruz, Mexico. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Department of Geology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
Rice, Prudence M. 1987 Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, María del Carmen, and Ponciano, Ortiz C. 1997 Olmec Ritual and Sacred Geography at Manatí. In Olmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns in the Ancient Gulf Lowlands, edited by Barbara L. Stark and Philip J. Arnold III, pp. 68–95. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Rust, William E. III, and Leyden, Barbara 1994 Evidence of Maize Use at Early and Middle Preclassic La Venta Olmec Sites. In Corn and Culture in the Prehistoric New World, edited by Sissel Johannessen and Christine A. Hastorf, pp. 181–201. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Rye, Owen 1976 Keeping Your Temper under Control: Materials and the Manufacture of Papuan Pottery. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 11:106–137.Google Scholar
Santley, Robert S., and Arnold, Philip J. III 1996 Prehispanic Settlement Patterns in the Tuxtlas Mountains, Southern Veracruz, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 23:222–259.Google Scholar
Sharer, Robert J. 1982 In the Land of Olmec Archaeology. Journal of Field Archaeology 9:253–267.Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara L. 2000 Framing the Gulf Olmec. In Olmec Art and Archaeology in Mesoamerica, edited by John E. Clark and Mary E. Pye, pp. 31–53. National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Stuiver, Minze, Reimer, Paula J., Bard, Eduard, Warren Beck, J., Burr, George S., Hughen, Konrad A., Kromer, Bernd, McCormac, Gerry, van der Plicht, Johannes, and Spurk, Marco 1998 INTACAL 98 Radiocarbon Age Calibration 24,000-0 Cal. BP. Radiocarbon 40:1041–1083.Google Scholar
VanDerwarker, Amber 2001 Formative Maize Agriculture in Southern Veracruz, Mexico. Paper presented at the 66th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.Google Scholar