Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:13:55.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Using Refuse Disposal Patterns to Infer Olmec Site Structure in the San Lorenzo Region, Veracruz, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Carl J. Wendt
Carl J. Wendt*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, California State University, Fullerton, P.O. Box 6846, Fullerton, CA 92834-6846
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I use data gathered from recent excavations conducted in the San Lorenzo region to explore the nature of Olmec site structure. Most studies dealing with this topic have focused on ceremonial precincts at large regional centers. Recent archaeological investigations conducted at the low lying Early Formative period (1500–900 B.C., radiocarbon years) site of El Remolino provide a unique opportunity to study how the Olmec organized domestic space outside primary centers. Although no easily identifiable structural remains were found at El Remolino, refuse disposal patterns are used to infer architectural arrangement and also provide clues on site layout. In order to investigate variations in household spatial structure in the San Lorenzo region, the Remolino data are compared with results from household archaeological studies conducted in an elite precinct (the Group D area) at the regional center of San Lorenzo. Findings indicate that household spatial layout at El Remolino ascribed to a residentially dispersed house-lot type of spatial patterning, whereas spatial structure in the Group D area of San Lorenzo adheres closer to the more nucleated house compound type of spatial patterning.

En este trabajo utilizo información recabada en recientes excavaciones realizadas en la región de San Lorenzo para explorar la naturaleza de la estructura de los sitios olmecas. La mayoría de los estudios previos se enfocaban en los recintos ceremoniales de los grandes centros regionales. Recientes investigaciones realizadas en el sitio El Remolino, en las tierras bajas inundables y perteneciente al Formativo Temprano (1500–900 a.C.), ha proporcionado una singular oportunidad para estudiar cómo los olmecas organizaban el espacio doméstico fuera de los centros primarios. Aunque no se identificaron claramente vestigios estructurales en El Remolino, los patrones de desecho son utilizados para inferir la organización arquitectónica y también proporcionan indicios sobre el plano arquitectónico. Con el propósito de investigar la variación en la estructura del espacio habitacional en la región de San Lorenzo, los datos de El Remolino son comparados con los resultados de estudios arqueológicos de contextos domésticos en un sector de elite (Grupo D) en el centro regional de San Lorenzo. Esta comparación indica que el plano de las unidades domésticas en El Remolino pertenece a una organización espacial de lotes habitacionales dispersos, mientras que la estructura del espacio del Grupo D de San Lorenzo se mantiene más allá del patrón espacial de núcleos de unidades domésticas agrupadas.

Type
Reports
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 449 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the Society for American Archaeology.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Rojas, Aguilar, de la Luz, Maria 1992 Excavatión de una Estructura Doméstica en San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán, Veracruz. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Universidad de Las Américas, Cholula, Puebla, México.Google Scholar
Arnold, Philip J. III 1990 Refuse Disposal and Ceramic Production Within Contemporary Mexican Houselots. American Anthropologist 92:915–932.Google Scholar
Cameron, Catherine M. 1991 Structure Abandonment in Villages. In Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 3, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 155–194. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Cameron, Catherine M., and Tomka, Steve A. (editors) 1993 Abandonment of Settlements and Regions: Ethnoar chaeological and Archaeological Approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Diane, and Chase, Arlen F. 2000 Inferences About Abandonment: Maya Household Archaeology and Caracol, Belize. Mayab 13:67–77.Google Scholar
Coe, Michael D., and Diehl, Richard A. 1980 The Archaeology of San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán. In In the Land of the Olmec, Vol. 1. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Cyphers, Ann 1996 Reconstructing Olmec Life at San Lorenzo. In Olmec Art of Ancient Mexico, edited by Elizabeth P. Benson and Beatrice de la Fuente, pp. 61–71. National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Cyphers, Ann 1997 Olmec Architecture at San Lorenzo. In Olmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns in the Ancient Gulf Lowlands, edited by Barbara Stark and Philip Arnold III, pp. 96–114. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Cyphers, Ann 1999 From Stone to Symbols: Olmec Art in Social Context. In Social Patterns in Pre-Classic Mesoamerica, edited by David C. Grove and Rosemary A. Joyce, pp. 155–182. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Deal, Michael 1985 Household Pottery Disposal in the Maya Highlands: An Ethnoarchaeological Interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4:243–291.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V. 1976 Excavating Deep Communities by Transect Samples. In The Early Mesoamerican Village, edited by Kent V. Flannery, pp. 68–72. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V. (editor) 1976 The Early Mesoamerican Village. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian, and Cannon, Aubrey 1983 Where the Garbage Goes: Refuse Disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2:117–163.Google Scholar
Hirth, Kenneth G. 1993 The Household as an Analytical Unit: Problems in Method and Theory. In Prehistoric Domestic Units in Western Mesoamerica, edited by Robert S. Santley and Kenneth G. Hirth, pp. 21–36. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Inomata, Takeshi, and Sheets, Payson 2000 Mesoamerican Households Viewed from Rapidly Abandoned Sites: An Introduction. Mayab 13:5–10.Google Scholar
Johnston, Kevin J., and Gonlin, Nancy 1998 What do Houses Mean? Approaches to the Analysis of Classic Maya Commoner Residences. In function and Meaning in Classic Maya Architecture, edited by Stephen D. Houston, pp. 141–185. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Joyce, Arthur A., and Johannessen, Sissel 1993 Abandonment and the Production of Archaeological Variability at Domestic Sites, la Abandonment of Settlements and Regions: Ethnoarchaeological and Archaeological Approaches, edited by Catherine M. Cameron and Steve A. Tomka, pp. 138–153. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, Susan (editor) 1987 Method and Theory for Activity Area Research: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kent, Susan (editor) 1990 Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Killion, Thomas W. 1990 Cultivation Intensity and Residential Site Structure: An Ethnoarchaeological Examination of Peasant Agriculture in the Sierra de los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 1:191–215.Google Scholar
Killion, Thomas W. 1992 Residential Ethnoarchaeology and Ancient Site Structure: Contemporary Farming and Prehistoric Settlement Agriculture at Matacapan, Veracruz, Mexico. In Gardens of Prehistory: The Archaeology of Settlement Agriculture in Greater Mesoamerica, edited by Thomas W. Killion, pp. 119–149. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Killion, Thomas W. (editor) 1992 Gardens of Prehistory: The Archaeology of Settlement Agriculture in Greater Mesoamerica. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Killion, Thomas W, Sabloff, Jeremy A., Tourtellot, Gair, and Dunning, Nicholas 1989 Intensive Surface Collection of Residential Clusters at Terminal Classic Sayil, Yucatan, Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 16:273–294.Google Scholar
Kuijt, Ian 1989 Refuse Patterning or Activity Areas: An Examination of Cultural Material from the Jack Harkey Site 1, New Mexico. In Households and Communities: Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, edited by Scott MacEachern, David J. W. Archer, and Richard D. Garvin, pp. 209–217. University of Calgary, Archaeological Association, Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar
Moore, Jerry D., and Gasco, Janine L. 1990 Perishable Structures and Serial Dwellings from Coastal Chiapas: Implications for the Archaeology of Households. Ancient Mesoamerica 1:205–212.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Laura C. 2002 Las Galeras and San Lorenzo: A Comparative Study of Two Early Formative Communities in Southern Veracruz, Mexico. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ochsenschlager, Edward 1992 Ethnographic Evidence for Wood, Boats, Bitumen and Reeds in Southern Iraq: Ethnoarchaeology at al-Hiba. In Trees and Timber in Mesopotamia, vol. 6, edited by J. N. Postgate and Marvin A. Powell, pp. 47–78. Bulletin on Sumerian Agriculture, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Oetelaar, Gerald A. 1993 Identifying Site Structure in the Archaeological Record: An Illinois Mississippian Example. American Antiquity 58:662–687.Google Scholar
Pérez, Ortiz, Arturo, Mario, and Cyphers, Ann 1997 La geomorfología y las evidencias arqueológicas en la region de San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, Veracruz. In Población, Subsistencia y Medio Ambiente en San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán, edited by Ann Cyphers, pp. 31–53. Universidad National Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, México.Google Scholar
González, Pajonares, Isabel, María 1999 Análisis e implicaciones del estudio arqueológico de B3-5, un área habitacional del Grupo D, San Lorenzo, Veracruz. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, México.Google Scholar
Pool, Christopher A. 1997 The Spatial Structure of Formative Houselots at Bezuapan. In Olmec to Aztec: Settlement Patterns in the Ancient Gulf Lowlands, edited by Barbara L. Stark and Philip J. Arnold III, pp. 40–67. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Rick, John W. 1976 Downslope Movement and Archaeological Intrasite Spatial Analysis. American Antiquity 41:133–144.Google Scholar
Santley, Robert S. 1992 A Consideration of the Olmec Phenomenon in the Tuxtlas: Early Formative Settlement Pattern, Land Use, and Refuse Disposal at Matacapan, Veracruz, Mexico. In Gardens of Prehistory: The Archaeology of Settlement Agriculture in Greater Mesoamerica, edited by Thomas W. Killion, pp. 150–183. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Santley, Robert S., and Hirth, Kenneth G. 1993 Household Studies in Western Mesoamerica. In Prehispanic Domestic Units in Western Mesoamerica, edited by Robert S. Santley and Kenneth G. Hirth, pp. 3–17. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Santley, Robert S., and Hirth, Kenneth G. (editors) 1993 Prehispanic Domestic Units in Western Mesoamerica. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Santley, Robert S., and Kneebone, Ronald R. 1993 Craft Specialization, Refuse Disposal, and the Creation of Spatial Archaeological Records in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. In Prehispanic Domestic Units in Western Mesoamerica, edited by Robert Santley and Kenneth Hirth, pp. 37–63. CRC Press, Boca Raton.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1987 Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Marc G. 1982 Toward an Understanding of Site Abandonment Behavior: Evidence from Historic Mining Camps in the Southwest Yukon. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1:237–265.Google Scholar
Stirling, Matthew W. 1947 On the Trail of La Venta Man. The National Geographic Magazine 91(2): 137–172.Google Scholar
Stirling, Matthew W. 1955 Stone Monuments of the Río Chiquito, Veracruz, Mexico. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 157, Anthropological Papers. No. 43, pp. 1–23. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Stothert, Karen E. 1994 Early Petroleum Extraction and Tar-boiling in Coastal Ecuador. In In Quest of Mineral Wealth: Aboriginal and Colonial Mining and Metallurgy in Spanish America, edited by Alan K. Craig and Robert C. West. pp. 343–354. Geoscience Publications, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Symonds, Stacey C. 2000 The Ancient Landscape at San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán, Veracruz, Mexico: Settlement and Nature. In Olmec Art and Archaeology in Mesoamerica, edited by John E. Clark and Mary E. Pye, pp. 55–73. National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Symonds, Stacey, Cyphers, Ann, and Lunagómez, Roberto 2002 Patrón de Asentamiento en San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, México.Google Scholar
Webster, David L., and Gonlin, Nancy 1988 Household Remains of the Humblest Maya. Journal of Field Archaeology 15:169–190.Google Scholar
Webster, David, Gonlin, Nancy, and Sheets, Payson 1997 Copán and Ceren: Two Perspectives on Ancient Mesoamerican Households. Ancient Mesomerica 8:43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, David, Freter, Anncorinne, and Gonlin, Nancy 2000 Copán: The Rise and Fall of an Ancient Maya Kingdom, Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
Wendt, Carl J. 2003 Early Formative Domestic Organization and Community Patterning in the San Lorenzo Tenochtitlán Region, Veracruz, Mexico. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Wendt, Carl J. 2005a Excavations at El Remolino: Household Archaeology in the San Lorenzo Olmec Region. Journal of Field Archaeology 30:163–180.Google Scholar
Wendt, Carl J. 2005b El Antiguo Procesamiento y Uso de Chapopote en las Tierras Bajas de San Lorenzo, Veracruz, Mexico. Manuscript on file, Department of Anthropology, California State University, Fullerton.Google Scholar
Wilk, Richard R., and Ashmore, Wendy (editors) 1988 Household and Community in the Mesoamerican Past. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Williams, Howel and Heizer, Robert F. 1965 Sources of Rocks Used in Olmec Monuments. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 1:1–39.Google Scholar