Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:18:48.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sourcing the Palygorskite Used in Maya Blue: A Pilot Study Comparing the Results of INAA and LA-ICP-MS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Dean E. Arnold ,
Hector Neff ,
Michael D. Glascock  and
Robert J. Speakman
Dean E. Arnold
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology-Anthropology, Wheaton College, Wheaton, Illinois 60187-5593 (Dean.E. Arnold @ wheaton.edu)
Hector Neff
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, California State University, Long Beach, CA 90840 ([email protected])
Michael D. Glascock
Affiliation:
Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211 ([email protected])
Robert J. Speakman
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Institution Museum Conservation Institute, Museum Support Center (MCI), 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, MD 20746 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Maya Blue is an unusual blue pigment consisting of a clay-organic complex of indigo and the unusual clay mineral palygorskite (also called attapulgite). Used on pottery, sculpture, and murals from the Preclassic to Late Colonial periods largely in Mesoamerica, blue was the color of sacrifice and ritual. Did the palygorskite used to make Maya Blue come from a restricted source in Yucatán like Shepard, Arnold, Arnold and Bohor believed, or from widespread sources like Littmann argued? This report presents the results of a pilot study comparing INAA and LA-ICP-MS analysis of 33 palygorskite samples collected from different parts of the Maya area. These data reveal that it is possible to discriminate mineral source locations, and that it should be possible to determine whether the palygorskite used to make Maya Blue came from widespread sources or was traded widely from one or a few sources. Consideration of contextual information such as agency, landscape and language suggest that the Shepard/Arnold/Bohor hypothesis is more plausible than that of Littmann. No matter which hypothesis is supported, however, each has significant implications for the relationship of the diffusion of Maya Blue (or the knowledge of its production) to Maya social organization.

Resumen

Resumen

El azul maya es un inusual pigmento que posee una estructura molecular que combina la tinta añil y la arcilla palygorskita, también llamada atapulgita. Utilizado en cerámica, escultura y pinturas murales desde el Pre-clásico hasta tiempos coloniales en la mayor parte del sur y centro de Mesoamérica, el azul era el color litúrgico y de sacrificio. ¿La procedencia de la arcilla palygorskita estaba limitada a una fuente en Yucatán como Shepard, Arnold, y Arnold y Bohor sugeríen; o a un espectro de fuentes ampliamente distribuidas como sugiere Littmann? Presentamos un estudio piloto en el que comparamos los resultados de los análisis de 33 muestras de palygorskita realizados por INAA y LA-ICP-MS, procedentes de diferentes lugares del área maya. Estos datos indican que se pueden discriminar distintas fuentes de palygorskita. Así mismo, es posible determinar si se utilizó palygorskita para fabricar el azul maya de una fuente limitada, o de varias -quizás por intercambio. Considerando la información lingüistica, de agencia social y del paisaje, se sugiere que la hipótesis de Shepard/Arnold/Bohor es más plausible que la de Littman. Sin embargo, y más allá de cuál es la más adecuada, cada una de ellas brinda implicancias significativas para entender la difusión del azul maya (o el conocimiento de su producción) en la organización social maya.

Type
Reports
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 44 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Arnold, Dean E. 1967 Sak lu’um in Maya Culture: and Its Possible Relationship to Maya Blue. Department of Anthropology Research Reports No. 2, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E. 1971 Ethnomineralogy of Ticul, Yucatán Potters: Etics and Emics. American Antiquity 36:20–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Dean E. 1987 The Evidence for Pre-Columbian Indigo in the New World. Antropología y Técnica No. 2, pp. 53–84. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E. 1991 Ethnoarchaeology and Investigations of Ceramic Production and Exchange: Can We Go Beyond Cautionary Tales? In The Legacy of Anna O. Shepard, edited by Ronald L. Bishop and Frederick W. Lange, pp. 321–345. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E. 2000 Does the Standardization of Ceramic Pastes Really Mean Specialization? Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7:333–375.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E. 2005a Linking Society with the Compositional Analyses of Pottery: A Model from Comparative Ethnography. In Pottery Manufacturing Processes: Reconstitution and Interpretation, edited by Alexandre Livingstone Smith, Dominique Bosquet and Remi Martineau, pp 15–21. BAR International Series 1349, Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E. 2005b Maya Blue and Palygorskite: A Second Possible Pre-Columbian Source. Ancient Mesoamerica 16:51–62.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E., and Bohor, Bruce F. 1975 Attapulgite and Maya Blue: An Ancient Mine Comes to Light. Archaeology 28 (January):23–29.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E., and Bohor, Bruce F. 1976 An Ancient Attapulgite Mine in Yucatán. Katunob 8(4):25–34 (June, 1974).Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E., Neff, Hector N., and Bishop, Ronald L. 1991 Compositional Analysis and ‘Sources’ of Pottery: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach American Anthropologist 93:70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, Dean E., Neff, Hector, Bishop, Ronald L., and Glascock, Michael D. 1999 Testing Interpretive Assumptions of Neutron Activation Analysis: Contemporary Pottery in Yucatán, 1964–1994. In Material Meanings: Critical Approaches to the Analysis of Style, edited by Elizabeth Chilton, pp. 61–84. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Arnold, Dean E., Neff, Hector, and Glascock, Michael D. 2000 Testing Assumptions of Neutron Activation Analysis: Communities, Workshops and Paste Preparation in Yucatán, Mexico. Archaeometry 42:301–316.Google Scholar
Bailey, S. W., Brindley, G. W., Johns, W. D., Martin, R. T., and Ross, M. 1971 Summary of National and International Recommendations on Clay Mineral Nomenclature: 1969–70 CMS Nomenclature Committee. Clays and Clay Minerals 19:129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrera Vázquez, Alfredo 1937 Cerámica Maya. Obre, Órgano de la Universidad National del Sureste de México 1 (3):162–164. Mérida.Google Scholar
Bohor, Bruce F. 1975 Attapulgite in Yucatán. Guidebook to Field Trip No. 4. International Clay Conference, Mexico City, July.Google Scholar
Brainerd, George W. 1958 The Archaeological Ceramics of Yucatán. Anthropological Records Vol. 19. University of California, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Cabrera Garrido, José María 1969 El ‘azul Maya’. Informes y trabajos del Institute de Conservación y Restauración de Obras de Arte, Arqueología y Etnología 8. Madrid.Google Scholar
Carroll, Dorothy 1970 Clay Minerals: A Guide to their X-Ray Identification. Geological Society of America Special Paper No. 126.Google Scholar
Chianelli, Russell R., de La Rosa, Myriam Pérez, Meitzner, George, Siadati, Mohammed, Berhault, Gelles, Mehta, Apurva, Pople, Joh, Fuentes, Servio, Alonzo-Nuñez, Gabriel, and Polette, Lori A. 2005 Synchrotron and Simulations Techniques Applied to Problems in Materials Science: Catalysts and Azul Maya Pigments. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 12:129–134 Google Scholar
Fois, Ettore, Gamba, Aldo, and Tilocca, Antonio 2003 On the Unusual Stability of Maya Blue Paint: Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 57:263–272.Google Scholar
Folan, William J. 1969 Sacalum, Yucatán: A Pre-Hispanic and Contemporary Source of Attapulgite. American Antiquity 34:182–183.Google Scholar
Gettens, Rutherford J. 1955 Identification of Pigments of Mural Paintings from Bonampak, Chiapas, Mexico. In Bonampak, Chiapas, Mexico, edited by Karl Ruppert, J. Eric S. Thompson, Tatiana Proskouriakoff, p. 67. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 602, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Gettens, Rutherford J. 1962 Maya Blue: An Unsolved Problem in Ancient Pigments. American Antiquity 27:557–564.Google Scholar
Glascock, Michael D. 1992 Characterization of Archaeological Ceramics at MURR by Neutron Activation Analysis and Multivariate Statistics. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, edited by Hector Neff, pp. 11–26. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 7, Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Gratuze, Bernard 1999 Obsidian Characterization by LA-ICP-MS and its Application to Prehistoric Trade in the Mediterranean and the Near East: Sources and Distribution of Obsidian within the Aegean and Anatolia. Journal of Archaeological Science 26:869–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, Ralph E. 1968 Clay Mineralogy, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Haude, May Elizabeth 1998 Identification of Colorants on Maps from the early colonial Period of New Spain (Mexico). Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 37:240–270.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Basil, Juang, Wenxing, Moser, Arvin, Facey, Glenn A., and Detellier, Christian 2003 Structural Study of Maya Blue: Textural, Thermal and Solid-state Multinuclear Magnetic Resonance Characterization of the Palygorskite-Indigo and Sepiolite-Indigo Adducts. Clays and Clay Minerals 51:318–326.Google Scholar
José-Yacamán, M., Rendón, Luis, Arenas, J., and Serra Puche, Mari Carmen 1996 Maya Blue Paint: An Ancient Nanostructured Material. Science 273:223–225.Google Scholar
Kleber, R., Masschelein-Kleiner, L., and Thissen, J. 1967 Etude et Identification du ‘Bleu Maya’. Studies in Conservation 12:41–56.Google Scholar
Leona, Marco, Casadio, Francesca, Bacci, Mauro, and Picollo, Marcello 2004 Identification of the Pre-Columbian Pigment Maya Blue on Works of Art by Noninvasive UV-VIS and Raman Spectroscopic Techniques. Journal of the American Institute of Conservation 43:39–54.Google Scholar
Littmann, Edwin R. 1980 Maya Blue: A New Perspective. American Antiquity 45:87–100.Google Scholar
Littmann, Edwin R. 1982 Maya Blue-Further Perspectives and the Possible Use of Indigo as the Colorant. American Antiquity 47:404–408.Google Scholar
Merwin, H. E. 1931 Chemical Analysis of Pigments. In The Temple of the Warriors at Chichen Itza, Yucatan, edited by Earl. H. Morris, Jean Chariot and Ann. A. Morris, pp. 355–356. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 406, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Moore, Duane M., and Reynolds, Robert C. Jr. 1997 X-Ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Neff, Hector 2000 Neutron Activation Analysis for Provenance Determination in Archaeology. In Modern Analytical Methods in Art and Archaeology, edited by Enrico Ciliberto and Giuseppe Spoto, pp. 81–134. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Ortega, M., Ascencio, J. A., San Germán, C. M., Fernández, M. E., López, L., and José-Yacamán, M. 2001 Analysis of Prehispanic Pigments from “Templo Mayor” of Mexico City. Journal of Materials Science 36:751–756.Google Scholar
Polette, Lori, Ugarte, Norma, and Chianelli, Russel 2000 In-Site Identification of Palygorskite in Maya Blue Samples Using Synchrotron X-ray Powder Diffraction. Paper presented at the Workshop on Synchrotron Radiation in Art and Archaeology, Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL), 18 October 2000. Electronic document, http://srs.dl.ac.uk/arch/ssrl/maya-blue.html, accessed March 11, 2005.Google Scholar
Rendón, Silvia 1947 Notas sobre la Alfareía Indígena de la Peninsula de Yucatán. Revista Mexicana de Estiidios Antropológicos 9:107–123.Google Scholar
Reyes-Valerio, Constatino 1993 De Bonampak al Templo Mayor: el azul maya en Mesoamérica. Siglo XXI, México, D.F.Google Scholar
Roundhill, Linda S., Regents-Bidet, Dorie, McGovern, Patrick, Michael, Rudolph 1989 Maya Blue: A Fresh Look at an Old Controversy. Seventh Palenque Round Table, 1989 Vol. IX, edited by Merle G. Robertson and Virginia M. Fields, pp. 253–256. Pre-Columbian Research Institute, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Sánchez del Río, Manuel, Martinetto, P., Somogyi, A., Reyes-Valerio, C., Dooryhée, E., Peltier, N., Alianelli, L, Moignard, B., Pichon, L., Calligaro, T., and Dran, J. C. 2004 Microanalysis Study of Archaeological Mural Samples Containing Maya Blue Pigment. Spectrochimica Acta Part B. 59:1619–1625.Google Scholar
Sánchez del Rio, Manuel, Martinetto, P., Reyes-Valerio, C., Dooryhée, E., and Suárez, M. 2006 Synthesis and Acid Resistance of Maya Blue Pigment. Archaeometry 48:115–130.Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O. 1962 Maya Blue: Alternative Hypotheses. American Antiquity 27:565–566.Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O. 1971 Ceramic Analysis: The Interrelations of Methods; the Relations of Analysts and Archaeologists. Science and Archaeology, edited by Robert H. Brill, pp. 55–63. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O., and Gottlieb, Hans B. 1962 Maya Blue: Alternative Hypotheses. Notes from a Ceramic Laboratory No. 1, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O., and Pollock, Harry E. D. 1971 Maya Blue: An Updated Record. Notes from a Ceramic Laboratory No. 4, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Speakman, Robert J., and Neff, Hector 2005 The Application of Laser Ablation ICP-MS to the Study of Archaeological Materials-an Introduction. In Laser Ablation ICP-MS in Archaeological Research, edited by Robert J. Speakman and Hector Neff, pp. 1–15. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Tagle, Alberto A., Paschinger, Hubert, Richard, Helmut, and Infante, Guillermo 1990 Maya Blue: Its Presence in Cuban Colonial Wall Paintings. Studies in Conservation 35:156–159.Google Scholar
Thompson, Raymond H. 1958 Modern Yucatecan Maya Pottery Making. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology No. 15. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Torres, Luis M. 1988 Maya Blue: How the Mayas could have made the Pigment. Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology, Proceedings of the Materials Research Society 123:123–128. Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Van Olphen, H. 1966 Maya Blue: A Clay-Organic Pigment? Science 154:645–646.Google Scholar