Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:28:27.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Response to Long's Radiocarbon Determinations That Attempt to Put Acceptable Chronology on the Fritz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Richard S. MacNeish
Richard S. MacNeish*
Affiliation:
Andover Foundation for Archaeological Research, PO Box 83, Andover, MA 01810-0002
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Long and Fritz argue that AMS dates on early maize were rejected because MacNeish suspected they were contaminated with bedacryl. In fact a letter from MacNeish to Long in 1988 addressed several possible explanations for the problems with the dates. The dates were rejected because they were inconsistent with well-established stratigraphic sequences and associated artifacts and ecofacts. The evidence is briefly summarized here, and the inconsistencies in the Arizona dates pointed out. It appears that the problem lies less with possible contamination with bedacryl, and more with the treatment of the samples by the Arizona laboratory.

Resumen

Resumen

Long y Fritz mantienen que rechazamos las fechas radiocarbónicas AMS obtenidas del maíz antiguo porque sospechamos que habían sido contaminadas con Bedacryl. En realidad, una comunicación mía a Long en 1988 expuso varias explicaciones para las fechas problemáticas. Las fechas fueron rechazadas porque no concuerdan con las secuencias estratigráficas reconocidas y los artefactos y ecofactos asociados. Presentamos un breve resúmen de la evidencia aquí, y señalamos las inconsecuencias de las fechas recientes. Es aparente que estas fechas problemáticas tienen menos que ver con su posible contaminación con Bedacryl y más que ver con su procesamiento en el laboratorio de Arizona.

Type
Comments
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 99 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Flannery, Kent V. 1986 Guilá Naquitz: Archaic Foraging and Early Agriculture in Oaxaca. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V., and MacNeish, Richard S. 1997 In Defense of the Tehuacán Project. Current Anthropology 38:660–672.Google Scholar
Fowler, Michael L., and MacNeish, Richard S. 1975 Excavations in the Coxcatlán Locality in the Alluvial Slopes. In The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, Vol. 5: Excavations and Reconnaissance, edited by Richard S. MacNeish, pp. 219–339. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gayle J. 1994 Are the First American Farmers Getting Younger? Current Anthropology 35:305–309.Google Scholar
Johnson, Frederick, and MacNeish, Richard S. 1972 Chronometric Dating. In The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, Vol. 4: Chronology and Irrigation, edited by F. Johnson, pp. 3–58. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, Paul C, MacNeish, Richard S., and Galinat, Walton C. 1967a Prehistoric Wild and Cultivated Maize. In The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley: Vol. I: Environment and Subsistence, edited by D. S. Byers, pp. 178–200. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, Paul C, MacNeish, Richard S., and Galinat, Walton C. 1967b Prehistoric Maize, Teosinte and Tripsacum from Ocampo, Tamaulipas, Mexico. Botanical Museum Leaflets 22(2):33–63. Harvard University.Google Scholar
MacNeish, Richard S. 1958 Preliminary Archaeological Investigations in the Sierra de Tamaulipas, Mexico. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, Pt. 6, Vol. 48, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
MacNeish, Richard S. 1978 The Science of Archaeology? Duxbury Press, North Scituate, MA.Google Scholar
MacNeish, Richard S. 2001 Mesoamerican Chronology. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Mesoamerican Cultures. Oxford University Press, New York. In press.Google Scholar
MacNeish, Richard S., and Eubanks, Mary 2000 Comparative Analysis of the Río Balsas and Tehuacán Models for the Origin of Maize. Latin American Antiquity 11(1):3–20.Google Scholar
MacNeish, Richard S., and García-Cook, Angel 1975 Excavations in the San Marcos Locality of the Travertine Slopes. In The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, Vol. 5: Excavations and Reconnaissance, edited by Richard S. MacNeish, pp. 137–160. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Piperno, Dolores, and Flannery, Kent V. 2000 Dates on Early Oaxaca Zea Mays. Science, in press.Google Scholar
Schoenwetter, James 1974 Pollen Records of Guilá Naquitz. American Antiquity 39:292–303.Google Scholar
Schoenwetter, James, and Smith, L. D. 1986 Pollen Analysis of the Oaxaca Archaic. In Guilá Naquitz: Archaic Foraging and Early Agriculture in Oaxaca, Mexico, edited by Kent V. Flannery, pp. 179–231. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. 1997a The Initial Domestication of Cucurbita pepo in the Americas 10,000 Years Ago. Science 276:932–934.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce D. 1997b Reconsidering the Ocampo Caves and the Era of Incipient Cultivation in Mesoamerica. Latin American Antiquity 8:342–383.Google Scholar