Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:40:18.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Merchant Colonies, Semi-Mesoamericans, and the Study of Cultural Contact: A Comment on Anawalt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Helen Perlstein Pollard
Helen Perlstein Pollard*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using evidence of dress modes, metallurgy, mortuary structures, and language, Anawalt (1992) presents a model of the impact of Ecuadorean trading colonies on West Mexican prehistory. But the model is built on inaccurate data about the Tarascans, and simplifies, to the point of distortion, the prehistory of the region. Furthermore, by linking the hypothesized Ecuadorean colonies to a semi-mesoamerican quality that is assumed to characterize West Mexico, Anawalt perpetuates a normative, typological approach to the definition of Mesoamerica and the study of cultural interaction.

Con evidencia sobre los atavíos, la metalurgia, las estructuras mortuorias (tumbas de tiro) y la lingüística, Anawalt (1992) ofrece un modelo del impacto de comunidades de mercaderes ecuatorianos en la prehistoria del occidente de México. Pero se construye el modelo con datos incorrectos acerca de los tarascos, y se simplifica la prehistoria de la región hasta el punto de confusión. Además se enlazan estos mercaderes ecuatorianos (hipotéticos) a una perspectiva sobre las sociedades prehispánicas de Nayarit, Jalisco y Michoacán como sociedades solamente "semi" mesoamericanas. En este manera, Anawalt continúa con un método normativo y tipológico en relacion a la definición de Mesoamérica y al estudio del intercambio cultural.

Type
Comments
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 383 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anawalt, P. R. 1992 Ancient Cultural Contacts Between Ecuador, West Mexico, and the American Southwest: Clothing Similarities. Latin American Antiquity 3:114–129.Google Scholar
Campbell, L., T., Kaufman, and T. C., Smith-Stark 1986 Meso-america as a Linguistic Area. Language 62:530–570.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P. 1984 Tarascan: From Meaning to Sound, In Linguistics, edited by M. Edmonson, pp. 56–82. Supplement to the Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. 2, V. R. Bricker, general editor. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1987 Language in the Americas. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.Google Scholar
Hosier, D. 1988 Ancient West Mexican Metallurgy: South and Central American Origins and West Mexican Transformations. American Anthropologist 90:832–855.Google Scholar
Pollard, H. P. 1993 Tariacuri’s Legacy, The Prehispanic Tarascan State. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Relación de Michoacán 1956 Relación de Michoacán. Facsimile ed., translated and edited by J. Tudela, J. Nunez, and P. Kirchoff. Aguilar, Madrid.Google Scholar
Suárez, J. A. 1983 The Mesoamerican Indian Languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar