Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:19:03.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Black-on-Orange Ceramic Production in the Aztec Empire's Heartland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mary G. Hodge ,
Hector Neff ,
M. James Blackman  and
Leah D. Minc
Mary G. Hodge
Affiliation:
Anthropology Program, University of Houston Clear, Lake, 2700 Bay Area Blvd., Houston, TX 77058
Hector Neff
Affiliation:
Missouri University Research Reactor, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211
M. James Blackman
Affiliation:
Conservation Analytical Laboratory, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
Leah D. Minc
Affiliation:
Museum of Anthropology, University of Michiga, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Compositional and stylistic analyses of decorated ceramics have provided information about the regional organization of economic systems in the Aztec empire’s core zone, the Basin of Mexico. Late Aztec Black-on-orange ceramics (A. D. 1350–1520) are found at nearly all archaeological sites in the Basin of Mexico, but prior to this study their sources were not verified. This study has investigated whether Black-on-orange ceramics were produced in one or many areas in order to define in greater detail dependent communities’ economic relations with the Aztec empire’s capital. To identify production areas, paste compositions of 85 Late Aztec Black-on-orange ceramic samples were compared using neutron-activation analysis. The analysis distinguished three different production areas in the eastern and southern parts of the Basin of Mexico, indicating that Late Aztec Black-on-orange ceramics represent a style adopted by regional manufacturing centers, and are not products of a single center. Because a number of decorative motifs are exclusive to particular paste groups, the sources of some Black-on-orange vessels can now be identified visually.

El análisis composicional y estilístico de la cerámica pintada ha producido información sobre la organización regional de los sistemas económicos en el centro del imperio azteca, la Cuenca de México. Los tiestos de la cerámica Negro sobre Anaranjado (Azteca III) del período Azteca Tardío (1350–1520 D. C.) se encuentran en casi todos los sitios arqueológicos en la Cuenca de México, pero anteriormente a este estudio sus orígenes no fueron verificados. Esa cerámica está pintada con líneas finas negras sobre una superficie naranja bruñida. La cerámica Negro sobre Anaranjado en el período precedente, el Azteca Temprano, se distingue por tener distintos elementos decorativos característicos de cada zona productiva, pero identificando visualmente a los centros productivos del período Azteca Tardío es difícil porque la cerámica está decorada uniformemente. La notable similitud entre la cerámica Azteca III sugiere que podría haberse hecho solamente en uno o dos centros, quizás en la capital del imperio, Tenochtitlán. Este estudio ha investigado si las vasíjas Negro sobre Anaranjado habían sido hechas en sólo una o muchas áreas; para poder definir en más detalle las relaciones económicas de las comunidades dependientes de la capital del imperio azteca. Para identificar las zonas de producción, se comparó la composición de la pasta de 85 tiestos de las partes del sur y este de la Cuenca de México usando el análisis por activación neutrónica. El análisis identificó tres grupos de tiestos que contienen diferentes elementos. Cada grupo de pasta corresponde a una distinta región geográfica, indicando que la cerámica fue producida en tres regiones: la región alrededor de Texcoco, la zona cercana de Chalco y la parte occidental de la península de Ixtapalapa. Así que podemos decir que la cerámica Negro sobre Anaranjado del período Azteca Tardío es un estilo adoptado por varios centros manufactureros, no sólo el producto de un centro, y que la capital del imperio no controló la producción alfarera. Los resultados nos enseñaron también que algunos motivos decorativos son exclusivos de ciertos grupos de pasta; como resultado, los orígenes de las vasijas Negro sobre Anaranjado que están decoradas con estos distintos temas ahora pueden ser identificados visualmente.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 130 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adams, R. McC. 1979 Late Prehispanic Empires of the New World. In Power and Propaganda: A Symposium on Ancient Empires, edited by M. T. Larsen, pp. 59–73. Akademisk Forlag, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Anderson, A. J., Berdan, F. F., and Lockhart, J. 1976 Beyond the Codices: The Nahua View of Colonial Mexico. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. E., Neff, H., and Bishop, R. L. 1991 Compositional Analysis and “Sources” of Pottery: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach. American Anthropologist 93:63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barlow, R. E. 1951 El códice de los alfareros de Cuauhtitlan. Revista Mexicana de Estudios Antropológicos 12:5–8.Google Scholar
Berdan, F. F., Blanton, R. E., Boone, E. H., Hodge, M. G., Smith, M. E., and Umberger, E. (coauthors) 1993 Aztec Imperial Strategies. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C., in press.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L., and D'Altroy, T. 1990 The Provincial Organization of Inka Ceramic Production. American Antiquity 55:120–138.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L., and Neff, H. 1989 Compositional Data Analysis in Archaeology. In Archaeological Chemistry IV, edited by R. O. Allen, pp. 576–586. Advances in Chemistry Series 220. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Blanton, R. E. 1972 Prehispanic Settlement Patterns of the Ixtapalapa Region, Mexico. Occasional Papers in Anthropology No. 6. Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google ScholarPubMed
Blanton, R. E. 1993 The Aztec Market System and the Growth of Empire. In Aztec Imperial Strategies, coauthored by F. F. Berdan, R. E. Blanton, E. H. Boone, M. G. Hodge, M. E. Smith, and E. Umberger. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C., in press.Google Scholar
Blanton, R. E., Kowalewski, S. A., Feinman, G., and Appel, J. 1981 Ancient Mesoamerica: A Comparison of Change in Three Regions. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Branstetter-Hardesty, B. 1978 Ceramics of Cerro Portezuelo, Mexico: An Industry in Transition. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Brenner, A. 1931 The Influence of Technique on the Decorative Style in the Domestic Pottery of Culhuacan. Contributions to Anthropology No. 13. Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E. S. 1975 Specialization and Exchange at the Late Postclassic (Aztec) Community of Huexotla, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E. S. 1983 Specialization, Market Exchange, and the Aztec State: A View from Huexotla. Current Anthropology 21:259–278.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E. S. 1986 The Division of Labor at Aztec Xico: The Chipped Stone Industry. In Economic Aspects of Prehispanic Highland Mexico, edited by B. L. Isaac, pp. 245–280. Research in Economic Anthropology, supplement No. 2. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E. S. 1987 Elite and Utilitarian Crafts in the Aztec State. In Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, edited by E. M. Brumfiel and T. K. Earle, pp. 102–118. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, E. S. 1991 The Organization of Agricultural Labor at Aztec Xico. In Land and Politics in the Valley of Mexico: A Two-Thousand Year Perspective, edited by H. R. Harvey, pp. 43–62. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Calnek, E. E. 1976 The Internal Structure of Tenochtitlan. In The Valley of Mexico, edited by E. R. Wolf, pp. 287–302. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Calnek, E. E. 1982 Patterns of Empire Formation in the Valley of Mexico, Late Postclassic Period, 1200–1521. In The Inca and Aztec States, 1400–1800, Anthropology and History, edited by J. A. Collier, R. I. Rosaldo, and J. D. Wirth, pp. 43–62. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Carrasco, P. 1977 Los señores de Xochimilco en 1558. Tlalocan 7:229–265.Google Scholar
Carrasco, P., and Monjarás-Ruiz, J. 1976 Visita del Oidor Gómez de Santillán al pueblo de Coyoacan y su sujeto Tacubaya en al año de 1553. Colección de documentos sobre Coyoacan, vol. 1. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México, D.F.Google Scholar
Carrasco, P., and Monjarás-Ruiz, J. 1978 Autos referentes al cacicazgo de Coyoacan que proceden del AGN. Colección de documentos sobre Coyoacan, vol. 2. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México, D.F.Google Scholar
Charlton, T. H., Nichols, D. L., and Charlton, C. O. 1991 Aztec Craft Production and Specialization: Archaeological Evidence from the City-State of Otumba, Mexico. World Archaeology 23:98–114.Google Scholar
Cortes, H. 1971 [1519–1526] Letters from Mexico. Translated by A. R. Pagden. Grossman, New York.Google Scholar
Díaz del Castillo, B. 1956 The Discovery and Conquest of New Spain 1517–1521. Edited by G. García and translated by A. P. Maudslay. Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
de Sahagún, Fray B. 1950–1982 Florentine Codex: A History of the Things of New Spain. Edited and translated by A. J. O. Anderson and C. E. Dibble. Monograph No. 14, pts. 1–13. School of American Research, Santa Fe, and the University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Doyle, M. W. 1986 Empires. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Durán, D. 1967 Historia de los indias de Nueva España e islas de la tierra firme. Porrúa, México, D.F.Google Scholar
Durán, D. 1971 Book of the Gods and Rites and the Ancient Calendar. Translated and edited by F. Horcasitas and D. Heyden. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, S. N. 1963 The Political Systems of Empires. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Evans, S. T. 1990 The Productivity of Maguey Terrace Agriculture in Central Mexico During the Aztec Period. Latin American Antiquity 1:117–132.Google Scholar
Franco, C.,  , J. L., and Peterson, F. A. 1957 Motivos decorativos en la cerámica azteca. Serie Científica No. 5. Museo Nacional de Antropologia, Mexico, D.F.Google Scholar
Galindo, y Villa, J. (editor) 1979 Colección Mendoza, o Códice Mendocino. Reprinted. Editorial Cosmos, México, D.F. Originally published 1925, Museo Nacional, México, D.F.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. 1964 The Aztecs Under Spanish Rule. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. 1971 Structure of the Aztec Empire. In Archaeology of Northern Mesoamerica, pt. 1, edited by G. F. Ekholm and I. Bernal, pp. 376–394. Handbook of Middle American Indians, vol. 10, R. Wauchope, general editor. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B., and Espejo, A. 1947 La alfarería correspondiente al último período de ocupación nahua del valle de México: I. Tlatelolco a Través de los Tiempos 9:10–26.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B., and Espejo, A. 1950 La alfarería correspondiente al último período de ocupación nahua del valle de Míxico: II. Tlatelolco a Través de los Tiempos 11:15–66.Google Scholar
Harbottle, G. 1976 Activation Analysis in Archaeology. Radiochemistry 3:33–72. The Chemical Society, London.Google Scholar
Hassig, R. R. 1982 Periodic Markets in Precolumbian Mexico. American Antiquity 47:46–51.Google Scholar
Hicks, F. 1982 Tetzcoco in the Early 16th Century: The City, the State, and the Calpolli . American Ethnologist 9: 230–249.Google Scholar
Hicks, F. 1987 First Steps Toward a Market-Integrated Economy in Aztec Mexico. In Early State Dynamics, edited by H. J. M. Claessen and P. Van de Velde. Studies in Human Society No. 2. Brill, Leiden.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. G. 1984 Aztec City-States. Studies in Latin American Ethnohistory and Archaeology No. 3. Memoirs No. 18. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. G. 1990 Big City Style and Rural Life: Standardization and Regional Variation in Aztec Ceramics. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. G. 1993 Political Organization of the Central Provinces. In Aztec Imperial Strategies, coauthored by F. F. Berdan, R. E. Blanton, E. H. Boone, M. G. Hodge, M. E. Smith, and E. Umberger. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C., in press.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. G., and Mine, L. D. 1990 The Spatial Patterning of Aztec Ceramics: Implications for Understanding Prehispanic Exchange Systems in the Valley of Mexico. Journal of Field Archaeology 17:415–437.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. G., and Mine, L. D. 1991 Aztec-Period Ceramic Distribution and Exchange Systems. Final Report to the National Science Foundation (Grant BNS 87-04177). Manuscript on file, Anthropology Program, University of Houston, Clear Lake. Copies available from the author.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. G., Neff, H., Blackman, M. J., and Mine, L. D. 1992 A Compositional Perspective on Ceramic Production in the Aztec Empire. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, edited by H. Neff, pp. 203–220. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 7. Prehistory Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Lattimore, O. 1962 Studies in Frontier History: Collected Papers, 1928–1958. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
León-Portilla, M. 1971 Códice de Coyoacan—nómina de tributes, siglo XVI. Estudios de Cultura Nahuatl 9:57–74.Google Scholar
Luttwak, E. N. 1971 The Grand Strategy of the Roman Empire. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Mine, L., Hodge, M. G., and Blackman, M. J. 1989 Neutron Activation of Early Aztec Orange Wares in the Valley of Mexico. Paper Presented at the 12th Annual Midwestern Conference of Mesoamericanists, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Mine, L., Hodge, M. G., and Blackman, M. J. 1993 Stylistic and Spatial Variability in Early Aztec Ceramics: Insights into Pre-Imperial Exchange Systems. In Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, edited by M. G. Hodge and M. E. Smith. IMS Studies on Culture and Society Series No. 5. Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York, Albany, in press.Google Scholar
Neff, H., Bishop, R. L., and Arnold, D. E. 1988 Reconstructing Ceramic Production from Ceramic Compositional Data: A Guatemalan Example. Journal of Field Archaeology 15:339–348.Google Scholar
Neff, H., Bishop, R. L., and Arnold, D. E. 1990 A Reexamination of the Compositional Affiliations of Formative Period Whiteware from Highland Guatemala. Ancient Mesoamerica 1:171–181.Google Scholar
Neff, H., Sisson, E. B., and Bishop, R. L. 1991 Neutron Activation Analyses of Late Postclassic Polychrome Pottery from Central Mexico. Manuscript on file, Missouri University Research Reactor, Columbia. Copies available from the senior author.Google Scholar
Neff, H., Glascock, M. D., McVicker, D. E., and Lambertino-Urquizo, L. 1991 Aztec Colonial Presence at Tlacotepec in the Valley of Toluca, Mexico. Manuscript on file, Missouri University Research Reactor, Columbia. Copies available from the senior author.Google Scholar
Parsons, J. R. 1966 The Aztec Ceramic Sequence in the Teotihuacan Valley, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Parsons, J. R. 1971 Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Texcoco Region, Mexico. Memoirs No. 3. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Parsons, J. R., Brumfiel, E. S., Parsons, M. H., and Wilson, D. J. 1982 Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Southern Valley of Mexico: The Chalco-Xochimilco Regions. Memoirs No. 14. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, J. R., Kintigh, K. W., and Gregg, S. A. 1983 Archaeological Settlement Pattern Data from the Chalco, Xochimilco, Ixtapalapa, Texcoco, and Zumpango Regions, Mexico. Technical Reports No. 14. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pasztory, E. 1983 Aztec Art. Abrams, New York.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T., and Price, B. J. 1968 Mesoamerica: The Evolution of a Civilization. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T., and Webster, D. 1988 The Mesoamerican Urban Tradition. American Anthropologist 90:521–546.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T., Parsons, J. R., and Santley, R. S. 1979 The Basin of Mexico: Ecological Processes in the Evolution of a Civilization. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sayre, E. V. 1975 Brookhaven Procedures for Statistical Analyses of Multivariate Archaeometric Data. Brookhaven National Lab, Report BNL-21693. Brookhaven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Scholes, F. V., and Adams, E. B. (editors) 1957 Información sobre los tributos que los indios pagaban a Moctezuma. Año de 1554. Documentos para la Historia de México Colonial No. 4. México, D.F.Google Scholar
Smith, M. E. 1979 The Aztec Marketing System and Settlement Patterns in the Valley of Mexico: A Central Place Analysis. American Antiquity 52:37–54.Google Scholar
Smith, M. E. 1990 Long-Distance Trade Under the Aztec Empire: The Archaeological Evidence. Ancient Mesoamerica 1:153–169.Google Scholar
Smith, M. E. 1993 Rural Economy in Late Postclassic Morelos: An Archaeological Study. In Economies and Polities in the Aztec Realm, edited by M. G. Hodge and M. E. Smith. IMS Studies on Culture and Society Series No. 5. Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, State University of New York, Albany, in press.Google Scholar
Solís, F., and Morales, D. 1991 Rescate de un rescate. Colecció de objetos arqueológicos de El Volador, Ciudad de México. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, México, D.F.Google Scholar
Spence, M. W. 1985 Specialized Production in Rural Aztec Society: Obsidian Workshops of the Teotihuacan Valley. In Contributions to the Archaeology and Ethnohistory of Greater Mesoamerica, edited by W. J. Folan, pp. 76–125. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Vaillant, G. C. 1938 A Correlation of Archaeological and Historical Sequences in the Valley of Mexico. American Anthropologist 40:535–573.Google Scholar
Vega Sosa, C. 1975 Forma y decoración en las vasijas de tradición azteca. Colección Científica, Arqueología, No. 23. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Míxico, D.F.Google Scholar
Whalen, M. E., and Parsons, J. R. 1982 Appendix I: Ceramic Markers Used for Period Designations. In Prehispanic Settlement Patterns in the Southern Valley of Mexico: The Chalco-Xochimilco Regions, by J. R. Parsons, E. S. Brumfiel, M. H. Parsons, and D. J. Wilson, pp. 385–459. Memoirs No. 14. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar