Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:24:02.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ultrashort powerful laser matter interaction: Physical problems, models, and computations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

E.G. Gamaly
E.G. Gamaly
Affiliation:
Laser Physics Centre, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, The Australian National University, P.O. Box 4, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The different physical models, computational methods, and results describing the properties of a plasma produced by an ultrashort laser pulse interacting with a solid target at different laser intensities are presented. The basic issues affecting the laser-plasma interaction are considered, including: the different absorption mechanisms; the formation of a transient, nonequilibrium, asymmetric electron distribution function; the energy losses; the role of instabilities and the ponderomotive force; ion expansion and acceleration; and surface wave propagation along the boundary of the plasma. The article concludes with a discussion of the range of applicability of the different approximations and future perspectives for the field.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 185 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexandrov, A.F. et al. 1984 Principles of Plasma Electrodynamics (Springer-Verlag, New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreev, A.A. et al. 1992 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 101, 1808;Google Scholar
Sov. Phys. JETP 74, (6), 963.Google Scholar
Boardman, A.D. (ed.) 1982 Electromagnetic Surface Waves (Wiley, New York).Google Scholar
Brunel, F. 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunel, F. 1988 Phys. Fluids 31, 2714.Google Scholar
Denavit, J. 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3052.Google Scholar
Dragila, R. & Gamaly, E.G. 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44, 6828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epperlein, E.M. & Short, R.W. 1991 Phys. Fluids B 3, 3092.Google Scholar
Gamaly, E.G. 1993a Phys. Rev. E, 48, 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamaly, E.G. 1993b Phys. Fluids B 5(3), 944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamaly, E.G. & Dragila, R. 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42, 929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamaly, E.G. & Tikhonchuk, V.T. 1988 Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 48, 413.Google Scholar
Gamaly, E.G. et al. 1990 J. Sov. Las. Res. 11, 277.Google Scholar
Gamaly, E.G. et al. 1991 In Proceedings SPIE, Conference on Short Pulse High Intensity Lasers and Applications Los Angeles, CA H. Baldis, ed. (SPIE, Los Angeles), 1413, pp. 95–106.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, V.L. 1967 Propagation of Electromagnetic Waves in Plasmas (Nauka, Moscow).Google Scholar
Gurevich, A.V. et al. 1965 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 49, 647.Google Scholar
Keldysh, L.V. 1964 Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 47, 1945.Google Scholar
Kondratenko, A.N. 1979 Penetration of a Field into a Plasma (Nauka, Moscow) (in Russian).Google Scholar
Kruer, W.L. 1987 The Physics of Laser-Plasma Interactions (Addison-Wesley, New York).Google Scholar
Landau, L.D. & Lifshitz, E.M. 1960 Electrodynamics of Continuous Media (Pergamon, New York).Google Scholar
Lifshitz, E.M. & Pitaevskii, L.P. 1981 Physical Kinetics (Pergamon, Oxford).Google Scholar
Luciani, J.F., Mora, P. & Virmont, J. 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luther-Davies, B. et al. 1991 Laser Phys. 1(4), 325–365.Google Scholar
Maine, P. et al. 1988 IEEE Trans. Quantum Electron. QE-24, 398.Google Scholar
Matte, J.P. & Aguenaou, K. 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45, 2558.Google Scholar
More, R.M. 1992 In Nuclear Fusion by Inertial Confinement, Velarde, G., Ronen, Y., & Martinez-Val, J.M., eds. (CRC Press, Boca Raton), pp. 152–180.Google Scholar
Raizer, Yu.P. 1974 Laser Spark and Propagation of Discharges (Nauka, Moscow) (in Russian).Google Scholar
Reuter, G.E.H. & Sondheimer, E.H. 1949 Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 195, 336.Google Scholar
Rozmus, W. & Tikhonchuk, V.T. 1990 Phys. Rev. A 42, 740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozmus, W. & Tikhonchuk, V.T. 1993 Phys. Rev. A 46, 7810.Google Scholar
Silin, V.P. 1973 Effects of Laser Radiation on Plasmas (Nauka, Moscow) (in Russian).Google Scholar
Stepanov, K.N. 1965 Zh. Tekhn. Fiz. 35(6), 1002.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. 1950 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 201, 192.Google Scholar
Town, R.P.J. & Bell, A.R. 1991 C.E.C. Paris, France, Report.Google Scholar
Wilks, S.C. et al. 1992 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weibel, E.W. 1959 Phys. Rev. Lett. 2, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zel'dovich, Ya.B. & Raizer, Yu.P. 1966 Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Academic Press, London).Google Scholar