Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:08:54.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface morphology correlated with sputtering yield measurements of laser-ablated iron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2018

Saba Tehniat ,
Shazia Bashir ,
Khaliq Mahmood  and
Ayesha Sharif
Saba Tehniat
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Studies in Physics, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
Shazia Bashir*
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Studies in Physics, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
Khaliq Mahmood
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Studies in Physics, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
Ayesha Sharif
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Studies in Physics, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
*
Author for correspondence: Shazia Bashir, Center for Advanced Studies in Physics, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Iron (Fe) targets are exposed to 100 pulses of Nd: YAG laser (532 nm, 6 ns, 10 Hz) at various fluences ranging from 4.8 to 38.5 J/cm2. In order to explore the effect of background environment, targets have been exposed under vacuum as well as under five different pressures ranging from 5 to 100 Torr of various background gases like Ar, Ne, O2, and air. The sputtering yield measurements and surface modifications of laser-ablated Fe are explored by quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, respectively. QCM measurements reveal that the sputtering yield of Fe is strongly affected by laser fluence, pressure and nature of gas. By increasing laser fluence, the sputtering yield initially increases due to enhanced energy deposition and then saturates due to self-regulating regime. However, with increasing pressures of background gases, the sputtering yield of Fe initially increases and then decreases. Owing to thermal conductivity, ionization potential, and mass of background gas, the sputtering yield of Fe varies in accordance with the sequence vacuum >Ar>Ne>O2> air. The SEM analysis reveals the formation of several features like laser-induced periodic surface structures, cones, cavities, channels, multiple ablative craters, and dot-like structures. The difference in the periodicity, size, and shape of features is explained on the basis of confinement and shielding effects of plasma and various energy deposition mechanisms. The surface profilometry analysis reveals that the crater depth increases with increasing the laser fluence in inert environments, while in case of reactive environments, it tends to decrease initially and afterwards it increases. X-ray diffraction and energy-dispersive X-ray analyses confirm the oxide formation in case of Fe treatment in O2 and air; however, no additional phases are observed for Fe irradiation under inert environments.

Keywords

Background gaseslaser fluencelaser-induced periodic surface structuressputtering yield
Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 427 - 441
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akram, M, Bashir, S, Rafique, MS, Hayat, A and Mahmood, K (2017) Laser induced surface morphology of molybdenum correlated with breakdown spectroscopy. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing 37, 287–304.Google Scholar
Ang, L, Lau, Y, Gilgenbach, R, Spindler, H, Lash, J and Kovaleski, S (1998) Surface instability of multipulse laser ablation on a metallic target. Journal of Applied Physics 83, 4466–4471.Google Scholar
Bashir, S, Ali, N, Akram, M, Mahmood, K and Ahmad, R (2012 a) Effect of ambient environment on excimer laser induced micro and nano-structuring of stainless steel. Applied Surface Science 261, 101–109.Google Scholar
Bashir, S, Farid, N, Mahmood, K and Rafique, MS (2012 b) Influence of ambient gas and its pressure on the laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and the surface morphology of laser-ablated Cd. Applied Physics A: Solids and Surfaces 107, 203–212.Google Scholar
Bashir, S, Rafique, MS, Ajami, A and Husinsky, W (2013) The growth of nanoscale periodic and dot-like structures on the surface of stainless steel with femtosecond laser pulses in the dry and wet ambient environment. Applied Physics A: Solids and Surfaces 113, 673–681.Google Scholar
Bashir, S, Khurshid, S, Akram, M, Ali, N, Ahmad, S and Yousaf, D (2015) Pulsed laser ablation of Ni in vacuum and N2 atmosphere at various fluences. Quantum Electronics 45, 640–647.Google Scholar
Behrisch, R, Roth, J, Bohdansky, J, Martinelli, A, Schweer, B, Rusbüldt, D and Hintz, E (1980) Dependence of light-ion sputtering yields of iron on ion fluence and oxygen partial pressure. Journal of Nuclear Materials 93, 645–655.Google Scholar
Bogaerts, A, Chen, Z and Bleiner, D (2006) Laser ablation of copper in different background gases: comparative study by numerical modeling and experiments. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 21, 384–395.Google Scholar
Boyadjiev, SI, Georgieva, V, Stefan, N, Stan, GE, Mihailescu, N, Visan, A, Mihailescu, IN, Besleaga, C and Szilágyi, IM (2017) Characterization of PLD grown WO3 thin films for gas sensing. Applied Surface Science 417, 218–223.Google Scholar
Bulgakov, A and Bulgakova, N (1998) Gas-dynamic effects of the interaction between a pulsed laser-ablation plume and the ambient gas: analogy with an underexpanded jet. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 31, 693–703.Google Scholar
Cristoforetti, G, Legnaioli, S, Palleschi, V, Tognoni, E and Benedetti, PA (2008) Observation of different mass removal regimes during the laser ablation of an aluminium target in air. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 23, 1518–1528.Google Scholar
Cumpson, P and Seah, M (1990) The quartz crystal microbalance; radial/polar dependence of mass sensitivity both on and off the electrodes. Measurement Science & Technology 1, 544–555.Google Scholar
Dawood, A, Bashir, S, Akram, M, Hayat, A, Ahmed, S, Iqbal, MH and Kazmi, AH (2015) Effect of nature and pressure of ambient environments on the surface morphology, plasma parameters, hardness, and corrosion resistance of laser-irradiated Mg-alloy. Laser and Particle Beams 33, 315–330.Google Scholar
Duley, WW (2005) UV Lasers: Effects and Applications in Materials Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibert, T, Dubreuil, B, Barthe, M and Debrun, J (1993) Investigation of laser sputtering of iron at low fluence using resonance ionization mass spectrometry. Journal of Applied Physics 74, 3506–3513.Google Scholar
Gierse, N, Schildt, T, Esser, H, Sergienko, G, Brezinsek, S, Freisinger, M, Zhao, D, Ding, H, Terra, A and Samm, U (2016) Quartz crystal microbalances for quantitative picosecond laser-material-interaction investigations – part I: technical considerations. Spectrochimica Acta B 126, 79–83.Google Scholar
Gojani, AB, Yoh, JJ and Yoo, JH (2008) Extended measurement of crater depths for aluminum and copper at high irradiances by nanosecond visible laser pulses. Applied Surface Science 255, 2777–2781.Google Scholar
Gusarov, AV, Gnedovets, AG and Smurov, I (2000) Gas dynamics of laser ablation: influence of ambient atmosphere. Journal of Applied Physics 88, 4352–4364.Google Scholar
Harilal, S, Bindhu, C, Nampoori, V and Vallabhan, C (1998) Influence of ambient gas on the temperature and density of laser produced carbon plasma. Applied Physics Letters 72, 167–169.Google Scholar
Harilal, S, Bindhu, C, Tillack, M, Najmabadi, F and Gaeris, A (2003) Internal structure and expansion dynamics of laser ablation plumes into ambient gases. Journal of Applied Physics 93, 2380–2388.Google Scholar
Iqbal, MH, Bashir, S, Rafique, MS, Dawood, A, Akram, M, Mahmood, K, Hayat, A, Ahmad, R, Hussain, T and Mahmood, A (2015) Pulsed laser ablation of Germanium under vacuum and hydrogen environments at various fluences. Applied Surface Science 344, 146–158.Google Scholar
Jelani, M, Bashir, S, Akram, M, Yousaf, D, Afzal, N and Ahmad, S (2014) Mechanical behaviour of excimer laser irradiated polycrystalline zirconium. Physica Scripta 89, 025703–025710.Google Scholar
Kanitz, A, Hoppius, JS, Del Mar Sanz, M, Maicas, M, Ostendorf, A and Gurevich, EL (2017) Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles by ultrashort pulsed laser ablation of iron in different liquids. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 18, 1155–1164.Google Scholar
Khalid, A, Bashir, S, Jalil, SA, Akram, M, Hayat, A and Dawood, A (2016) Spectroscopic and morphological studies of laser ablated silver. Optik 127, 5128–5134.Google Scholar
Khan, S, Bashir, S, Hayat, A, Khaleeq Rahman, and Haq, F (2013) Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy of tantalum plasma. Physics of Plasmas, 20, 073104–073112.Google Scholar
Kittel, C (2005) Introduction to Solid State Physics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kools, J, Van De Riet, E and Dieleman, J (1993) A simple formalism for the prediction of angular distributions in laser ablation deposition. Applied Surface Science 69, 133–139.Google Scholar
Lunney, JG and Jordan, R (1998) Pulsed laser ablation of metals. Applied Surface Science 127, 941–946.Google Scholar
Miller, JC (1997) Introduction to laser desorption and ablation. Experimental Methods in Physical Science 30, 1–13.Google Scholar
Muenster, B, Welle, A, Ridder, B, Althuon, D, Striffler, J, Foertsch, TC, Hahn, L, Thelen, R, Stadler, V and Nesterov-Mueller, A (2016) Solid-material-based coupling efficiency analyzed with time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry. Applied Surface Science 360, 306–314.Google Scholar
Pallotti, D, Ni, X, Fittipaldi, R, Wang, X, Lettieri, S, Vecchione, A and Amoruso, S (2015) Laser ablation and deposition of titanium dioxide with ultrashort pulses at 527 nm. Applied Physics B: Photophysics and Laser Chemistry 119, 445–452.Google Scholar
Qiao, X, Zhang, X, Tian, Y and Meng, Y (2016) Progresses on the theory and application of quartz crystal microbalance. Applied Physics Reviews 3, 031106–031122.Google Scholar
Sauerbrey, G (1959) Verwendung von Schwingquarzen zur Wägung dünner Schichten und zur Mikrowägung. Zeitschrift fuer Physik A: Hadrons and Nuclei 155, 206–222.Google Scholar
Scharf, T and Krebs, H (2002) Influence of inert gas pressure on deposition rate during pulsed laser deposition. Applied Physics A: Solids and Surfaces 75, 551–554.Google Scholar
Shen, M, Crouch, C, Carey, J, Younkin, R, Mazur, E, Sheehy, M and Friend, C (2003) Formation of regular arrays of silicon microspikes by femtosecond laser irradiation through a mask. Applied Physics Letters 82, 1715–1717.Google Scholar
Sipe, J, Young, JF, Preston, J and Van Driel, H (1983) Laser-induced periodic surface structure. I. Theory Physical Review B 27, 1141–1154.Google Scholar
Svendsen, W, Ellegaard, O and Schou, J (1996) Laser ablation deposition measurements from silver and nickel. Applied Physics A: Solids and Surfaces 63, 247–255.Google Scholar
Tokarev, V (2006) Viscous liquid expulsion in nanosecond UV laser ablation: from “clean” ablation to nanostructures. Laser Physics 16, 1291–1307.Google Scholar
Yar, A, Ali, R and Baig, MA (2013) Measurement of the photoionization cross section for the 6 p 2P3/2 state of potassium using a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. Physical Review A 87, 045401–045406.Google Scholar
Yaseen, N, Bashir, S, Shabbir, MK, Jalil, SA, Akram, M, Hayat, A, Mahmood, K, Haq, F, Ahmad, R and Hussain, T (2016) Nanosecond pulsed laser ablation of Ge investigated by employing photoacoustic deflection technique and SEM analysis. Physica B: Condensed Matter 490, 31–41.Google Scholar
Yousaf, D, Bashir, S, Akram, M, Kalsoom, U and Ali, N (2014) Laser irradiation effects on the surface, structural and mechanical properties of Al–Cu alloy 2024. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids 169, 144–156.Google Scholar