Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:39:22.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of the emissivity of the rear face of a shocked foil with temporal and X-UV spectral resolution in single and colliding foil experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

R. Fabbro ,
B. Faral ,
J. C. Gauthier ,
C. Chenais-Popovics ,
J. P. Geindre  and
H. Pepin
R. Fabbro
Affiliation:
Laboratoire LULI, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
B. Faral
Affiliation:
Laboratoire LULI, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
J. C. Gauthier
Affiliation:
Laboratoire PHMI, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
C. Chenais-Popovics
Affiliation:
Laboratoire PHMI, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
J. P. Geindre
Affiliation:
Laboratoire PHMI, Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France
H. Pepin
Affiliation:
I.N.R.S. Energie, Montreal, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The emissivity of the rear of a shocked foil is spectrally and temporally resolved by coupling a transmission grating (1000 I/mm) and an X-UV streak camera (with a low density Csl photocathode), providing a high temporal resolution over a large spectral range. The shock is generated with two techniques: direct illumination of a single Al foil with a 0.26 μm wavelength laser (ablation pressure ≈ 50 Mbars) or by colliding an Al foil with a laser accelerated CH foil (generated pressures greater than 100–200 Mbars). Different thicknesses of Al are used in single foil experiments, and different initial spacing and impacted foil thicknesses are used in double foil experiments. Double foil experiments indicate that targets can be optimized for high pressure generation, and single foil experiments show that there is a radiative heat wave, around 200 eV, due to the heating of the foil by X rays emitted in the ablated region during the laser pulse. Double foil experiments have been compared with 2-D hydrodynamic Lagrangian simulations and single foil experiments have been compared with 1-D hydrodynamic Lagrangian simulations taking into account radiative heat transfer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 8 , Issue 1-2 , January 1990 , pp. 73 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azteni, S. 1986 Comput. Phys. Commun. 43, 107.Google Scholar
Cottet, F. et al. to be published in J. Appl. Physics.Google Scholar
Duston, D. et al. 1983 Phys. Rev. A27, 1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duston, D. et al. 1985 Phys. Rev. A31, 3220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbro, R. et al. 1985 Phys. Fluids, 28, 3414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbro, R. et al. 1986 Laser and Particle Beams 4, 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faral, R. et al. 1987 Shock Waves in Condensed Matter (Proceedings of the American Physical Society Topical Conference, held in Monterey) Edited by: Schmidt, S.C. and Holmes, N.C..Google Scholar
Gauthier, J. C. & Geindre, J. P. 1987 Annual report of the G.R.E.C.O. I.L.M. (unpublished).Google Scholar
Harrach, R. J. & Skoze, A. 1982 Univ. of California report No. UCRL-86798-Rev.l (unpublished).Google Scholar
Pepin, H. et al. 1985 J. P. Phys. Fluids, 28, 3393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, M. D. et al. 1983 Univ. of California report No. UCRL-89750 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Schmalz, R. F., Hermann, P. & Meyer-Ter-Vehn, J. 1983 16th European Conference on Laser Interaction with Matter, London (paper G5).Google Scholar
Virmont, J. & Faral, B. 1985 Annual report of the G.R.E.C.O. I.L.M. (unpublished).Google Scholar
Yaakobi, B. et al. 1981 Opt. Comm. 39, 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeldovitch, Ya. B. & Razier, Yu. P. 1967 Physics of Shock Waves and High Temperatures Hydrodynamic Phenomena (Academic Press, New York) Vol. I and II.Google Scholar