Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:36:57.454Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shock interaction with a heavy gas cylinder: Emergence of vortex bilayers and vortex-accelerated baroclinic circulation generation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2004

SANDEEP GUPTA
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Visiometrics and Modeling, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
SHUANG ZHANG
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Visiometrics and Modeling, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey
NORMAN J. ZABUSKY
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Visiometrics and Modeling, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey

Abstract

We present a numerical study to late times of a Richtmyer–Meshkov environment: a weak shock (M = 1.095) interacting with a heavy cylindrical bubble. The bubble interface is modeled as a diffuse interfacial transition layer (ITL) with finite thickness. Our simulation with the piecewise parabolic method (PPM) yields very good agreement in large- and intermediate-scale features with Jacobs' experiment (Jacobs, 1993). We note the primary circulation enhancement deposited baroclinically upon the incident shock wave, and significant secondary baroclinic circulation enhancement, first observed in Zabusky and Zhang (2002). We propose that this vortex-accelerated circulation deposition is universal. These baroclinic processes are mediated by a strong gradient intensification and stretching of the ITL and result in close-lying vortex bilayers (VBLs) and the emergence of vortex projectiles (VPs). These account for the elongated, kidney-shaped morphology of the rolled up bubble domain at late times.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balsara, D.S. & Shu, C.W. (2000). Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 160, 405452.Google Scholar
Colella, P. & Woodward, P.R. (1984). The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 54, 174201.Google Scholar
Hass, J.F. & Sturtevant, B. (1987). Interaction of weak shock waves with cylindrical and spherical gas inhomogeneities. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 4176.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J.W. (1993). The dynamics of shock accelerated light and heavy gas cylinder. Phys. Fluids 5, 22392247.Google Scholar
Meshkov, E E. (1969). Interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave. Sov. Fluid Dyn. 4, 101108.Google Scholar
Picone, J.M. & Boris, J.P. (1988). Vorticity generation by shock propagation through bubbles in a gas. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 2351.Google Scholar
Quirk, J.J. & Karni, S. (1996). On the dynamics of a shock-bubble interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 318, 129163.Google Scholar
Richtmyer, R.D. (1960). Taylor instability in shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Comm. Pure and Appl. Math. 8, 297319.Google Scholar
Samtaney, R. & Zabusky, N.J. (1994). Circulation deposition on shock accelerated planar and curved density-stratified interfaces: Models and scaling laws. J. Fluid Mech. 269, 4578.Google Scholar
Zabusky, N.J., Gupta, S., Gulak, Y. & Samtaney, R. (2003). Localization and spreading of contact discontinuity layers in simulations of compressible dissipationless flows. J. Comput. Phys. 188, 348364.Google Scholar
Zabusky, N.J. & Zeng, S.M. (1998). Shock cavity implosion morphologies and vortical projectile generation in axisymmetric shock-spherical F/S bubble interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 362, 327346.Google Scholar
Zabusky, N.J. & Zhang, S. (2002). Shock planar-curtain interactions in two dimensions: Emergence of vortex double layers, vortex projectiles, and decaying stratified turbulence. Phys. Fluids 14, 419422.Google Scholar