Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:38:49.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent Livermore research on ion beam fusion targets: Utilization of direct-drive efficiency during optimization of symmetry and utilization of polarized DT fuel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

James W.-K. Mark
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550

Abstract

We investigated several examples of ion beam targets that utilize the energy efficiency of direct drive while optimizing on the symmetry requirements. Heavy-ion beams of charge state Z ≥ 3 at 5–10 GeV have ≲15–20 m bending radii with 3.5-T fields. Beams like these could be used with targets involving direct drive. Control of asymmetries in direct-drive ion beam targets depends on control of the effects of residual target asymmetries after an appropriate illumination scheme has been adopted. In this paper, we outline results of our investigations into ion beam target concepts in which the effects of residual asymmetries are ameliorated. The beams are placed according to our axially symmetric Gaussian-quadrature illumination scheme (Mark 1986). The targets survive the effects of residual asymmetries in our recent 2-D hydrodynamic simulations. We also briefly discuss the additional positive effects of polarized DT fuel on ion beam targets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bangerter, R. O. & Meeker, D. J. 1976 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report No. UCRL-78474.Google Scholar
Bangerter, R. O., Mark, J. W-K. & Thiessen, A. R. 1982 Phys. Lett. 88A, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barletta, W. A. et al. 1983 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report No. UCRL–50021–82. pp. 320 to 3–28.Google Scholar
Brueckner, K. A. & Jorna, S. 1974 Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cicchitelli, L. et al. 1984 Laser Part. Beams 2, 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauser, M. J. 1975 Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulsrud, R. M. et al. 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindl, J. D. & Bangerter, R. O. 1975. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report No. UCRL-77042.Google Scholar
Lindl, J. D. & Mark, J. W-K. 1985 Laser Part. Beams 3, 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, J. W-K. 1982 in Symposium on Accelerator Aspects of Heavy Ion Fusion (Darmstadt, Germany), pp. 454513.Google Scholar
Mark, J. W-K. 1986 Phys. Lett. 114A, 458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, J. W-K. & Pan, Y. L. 1985 in Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion, AIP Conference Proceedings No 152(American Institute of Physics,New York 1986), pp. 435440; also Mark, J. W-K., in Proceeding of the 1984 Topical Conference on Physics of lCF Targets, Los Alamos National Laboratory Report No. X–l–85–22, LA–CP–85–138, pp. 181–186.Google Scholar
Mark, J. W-K. & Lindl, J. D. 1986 in Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion, AIP Conference Proceedings No.152(American Institute of Physics,New York), pp. 441447.Google Scholar
Mark, J. W-K. et al. 1986 in Heavy Ion Inertial Fusion, AIP Conference Proceedings No. 152(American Institute of Physics,New York), pp. 227235.Google Scholar
More, R. M. 1983 Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Y. L. & Hatchett, S. 1986 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report No. UCRL-94235.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. D., Lindl, J. D. & Thiessen, A. R. 1984 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Laser Program 1983 Annual Report, pp. 35 to 3–9.Google Scholar
Souers, P. C. et al. 1986 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 4, 1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, M. A. & Clauser, M. J. 1975 App. & Phys. Lett. 27, 483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar