Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:19:13.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A multiphase buoyancy-drag model for the study of Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities in dusty gases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2011

Kaushik Balakrishnan  and
Suresh Menon
Kaushik Balakrishnan*
Affiliation:
Computing Sciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
Suresh Menon
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Kaushik Balakrishnan, Computing Sciences Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new multiphase buoyancy-drag model is developed for the study of Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities in dusty gases, extending on a counterpart single-phase model developed in the past by Srebro et al. (2003). This model is applied to single- and multi-mode perturbations in dusty gases and both Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities are investigated. The amplitude for Rayleigh-Taylor growth is observed to be contained within a band, which lies within limits identified by a multiphase Atwood number that is a function of the fluid densities, particle size, and a Stokes number. The amplitude growth is subdued with (1) an increase in particle size for a fixed particle number density and with (2) an increase in particle number density for a fixed particle size. The power law index for Richtmyer-Meshkov growth under multi-mode conditions also shows dependence to the multiphase Atwood number, with the index for the bubble front linearly decreasing and then remaining constant, and increasing non-linearly for the spike front. Four new classes of problems are identified and are investigated for Rayleigh-Taylor growth under multi-mode conditions for a hybrid version of the model: (1) bubbles in a pure gas rising into a region of particles; (2) spikes in a pure gas falling into a region of particles; (3) bubbles in a region of particles rising into a pure gas; and (4) spikes in a region of particles falling into a pure gas. Whereas the bubbles accelerate for class (1) and the spikes for class (4), for classes (2) and (3), the spikes and bubbles, respectively, oscillate in a gravity wave-like phenomenon due to the buoyancy term changing sign alternatively. The spike or bubble front, as the case may be, penetrates different amounts into the dusty or pure gas for every subsequent penetration, due to drag effects. Finally, some extensions to the presently developed multiphase buoyancy-drag model are proposed for future research.

Keywords

Buoyancy-Drag modelDusty gasHydrodynamic instabilityRayleigh-TaylorRichtmyer-Meshkov
Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 201 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alon, U., Hecht, J., Mukamel, D. & Shvarts, D. (1994). Scale invariant mixing rates of hydrodynamically unstable interfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2867–2870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alon, U., Hecht, J., Ofer, D. & Shvarts, D. (1995). Power laws and similarity of Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov mixing fronts at all density ratios. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 534–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balakrishnan, K. & Menon, S. (2010). On turbulent chemical explosions into dilute aluminum particle clouds. Combu. The. Model. 14, 583–617.Google Scholar
Balakrishnan, K., Ukai, S. & Menon, S. (2011). Clustering and combustion of dilute aluminum particle clouds in a post-detonation flow field. Proc. Combustion Institute. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakrishnan, K. (2010). On the high fidelity simulations of chemical explosions and their interaction with solid particle clouds. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Brouillette, M. (2002). The Richtmyer-Meshkov instability. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 34, 445–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. (1981). Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Chapman, P.R. & Jacobs, J.W. (2006). Experiments on the three-dimensional incompressible Richtmyer-Meshkov instability. Phys. Fluids 18, 074101.Google Scholar
Colella, P. & Woodward, P.R. (1984). The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 54, 174–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalziel, S.B. (1993). Rayleigh-Taylor instability: experiments with image analysis. Dynam. Atmosph. Oceans 20, 127–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimonte, G. & Schneider, M. (2000). Density ratio dependence of Rayleigh-Taylor mixing for sustained and impulsive acceleration histories. Phys. Fluids 12, 304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erez, L., Sadot, O., Oron, D., Erez, G., Levin, L.A., Shvarts, D. & Ben-Dor, G. (2000). Study of the membrane effect on turbulent mixing measurements in shock tubes. Shock Waves 10, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goncharov, V.N. (2002). Analytical model on nonlinear, single-mode, classical Rayleigh-Taylor instability at arbitrary Atwood numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 134502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kannan, R. & Wang, Z.J. (2009). A Study of viscous flux formulations for a p-multigrid spectral volume Navier Stokes solver. J. Sci. Comput. 41, 165–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kannan, R. & Wang, Z.J. (2010). A variant of the LDG viscous flux formulation for the Spectral Volume method. J. Sci. Comput. doi: 10.1007/s10915-010-9391-0.Google Scholar
Latini, M., Schilling, O. & Don, W.S. (2007). Effects of WENO flux reconstruction order and spatial resolution on reshocked two-dimensional RichtmyerMeshkov instability. J. Comput. Phys. 221, 805–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layzer, D. (1955). On the instability of superposed fluids in a gravitational field. Astrophys. J. 122, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leinov, E., Malamud, G., Elbaz, Y., Levin, L.A., Ben-Dor, G., Shvarts, D. & Sadot, O. (2009). Experimental and numerical investigation of the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability under re-shock conditions. J. Fluid Mech. 626, 449–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, C., Kannan, R. & Wang, Z.J. (2009). A p-multigrid spectral difference method with explicit and implicit smoothers on unstructured triangular grids. Comput.Fluids 38, 254–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meshkov, E.E. (1969). Instability of the interface of two gases accelerated by a shock wave. Fluid Dynam. 4, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, D.H. (1964). The stability of plane Poisuelle flow of a dusty gas. J. Fluid Mecha. 18, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikaelian, K.O. (2003). Explicit expressions for the evolution of single mode Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities at arbitrary atwood numbers. Phys. Rev. E 47, 026319.Google Scholar
Miles, A.R. (2004). Bubble merger model for the nonlinear Rayleigh-Taylor instability driven by a strong blast wave. Phys. Plasmas 11, 5140–5155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, A.R. (2009). The blast-wave-driven instability as a vehicle for understanding supernova explosion structure. Astrophys. J. 696, 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, H. & Glass, I.I. (1982). On a dusty-gas shock tube. Proc. of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 382(1783), 373–388.Google Scholar
Oron, D., Arazi, L., Kartoon, D., Rikanati, A., Alon, U. & Shvarts, D. (2001). Dimensionality dependence of the Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instability late-time scaling laws. Phys. Plasmas 8, 2883–2889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramshaw, J.D. (1998). Simple model for linear and nonlinear mixing at unstable fluid interfaces with variable acceleration. Phys. Rev. E 58, 5834–5840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord. (1883). Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proc. of the London Mathematical Society 14, 170–177.Google Scholar
Richtmyer, R.D. (1960). Taylor instability in a shock acceleration of compressible fluids. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 13, 297–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusanov, V.V. (1961). Calculation of Interaction of Non-Steady Shock Waves With Obstacles. J. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. USSR 1, 267–279.Google Scholar
Saffman, P.G. (1962). On the stability of laminar flow of a dusty gas. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilling, O., Latini, M. & Don, W.S. (2007). Physics of reshock and mixing in single-mode Richtmyer-Meshkov instability. Phys. Rev. E 76, 026319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharp, D.H. (1984). An overview of Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Phys. D. 12, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shvarts, D., Sadot, O., Oron, D., Kishony, R., Srebro, Y., Rikanati, A., Kartoon, D., Yedvab, Y., Elbaz, Y., Yosef-Hai, A., Alon, U., Levin, L.A., Sarid, E., Arazi, L. & Ben-Dor, G. (2000). Studies in the evolution of hydrodynamic instabilities and their role in inertial confinement fusion. 18th Fusion Energy Conference, IAEA-CN-77, 4–10 October, Sorrento, Italy.Google Scholar
Sommerfeld, M. (1985). The unsteadiness of shock waves propagating through gas-particle mixtures. Exper. Fluids 3, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srebro, Y., Elbaz, Y., Sadot, O., Arazi, L. & Shvarts, D. (2003). A general buoyancy-drag model for the evolution of the Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov innstabilities. Laser Part. Beams 21, 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G.I. (1950). The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. Proc. of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 201(1065), 192–196.Google Scholar
Toro, E.F. (1999). Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ukai, S., Balakrishnan, K. & Menon, S. (2010). On Richtmyer-Meshkov instability in dilute gas-particle mixtures. Phys. Fluids 22, 104103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leer, B. (1979). Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme, V. A second order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 32, 101–136.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J.P. & Jacobs, J.W. (2007). Experimental study of the single-mode three-dimensional Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids 19, 124102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wouchuk, J.G. (2001). Growth rate of the linear Richtmyer-Meshkov instability when a shock is reflected. Phys. Rev. E 63, 056303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, D.L. (1984). Numerical simulation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Phys. D 12, 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, D.L. (1989). Modelling turbulent mixing by Rayleigh-Taylor instability . Phys. D 37, 270–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, D.L. (1991). Three-dimensional numerical simulation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids A 3, 1312–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, D.L. (1994). Numerical simulation of mixing by Rayleigh-Taylor and Richtmyer-Meshkov instabilities. Laser Part. Beams 12, 725–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar