Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T14:53:11.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fokker–Planck simulations of interactions of femtosecond laser pulses with dense plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

J. Limpouch
Affiliation:
Computational Physics Group, Department of Physical Electronics, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, 115 19 Prague, Czech Republic
L. Drska
Affiliation:
Computational Physics Group, Department of Physical Electronics, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, 115 19 Prague, Czech Republic
R. Liska
Affiliation:
Computational Physics Group, Department of Physical Electronics, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Břehová 7, 115 19 Prague, Czech Republic

Abstract

The interaction of femtosecond laser pulses with solid-state density plasmas in regime of normal skin effect is investigated by means of numerical simulation. For short-wavelength lasers and laser pulses with length ≲ 120 fs full width at half maximum, the regime of normal skin effect is shown to hold for peak intensities up to 1017 W/cm2. The basic characteristics of the interaction are revealed and certain departures from simplistic models in electron distribution function, in plasma dielectric constant, and in laser absorption are pointed out. Comparison with the published experimental results is made.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, A.R. et al. 1981 Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornolti, F. et al. 1991 Laser Part. Beams 9, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drska, L. et al. 1992 Laser Part. Beams 10, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. & Rose, S.J. 1991 In RAL Annual Report RL–91–025, p. 44.Google Scholar
Epperlein, E.M. et al. 1988 Comput. Phys. Comm. 52, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedosejevs, R. et al. 1990 Appl. Phys.B 50, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamaly, E.G. & Tikhonchuk, V.I. 1989 JETP Lett., 48, 453.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.C. et al. 1989, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 25, 2640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liska, R. & Drska, L., 1990 In ISSAC-90: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, Tokyo (ACM Press, New York), p. 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maksimov, A.V. et al. 1990 Fiz. Plazmy 16, 575.Google Scholar
Matte, J.P. et al. 1988 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 30, 1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milchberg, H.M. et al. 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polyaschuk, A.Y. 1990 Teplofiz. Vysokich Temp. 28, 877.Google Scholar
Rozmus, W. & Tikhonchuk, V.T. 1990 Phys. Rev.A, 42, 7402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauerbrey, R. et al. 1992 In Proceedings of the 3rd International Colloquium on X-Ray Lasers, Schliersee, paper O-15.Google Scholar
Shkarofsky, P. et al. 1966 The Particle Kinetics of Plasmas (Addison-Wesley, London), p. 284.Google Scholar
Silin, V.P. & Ruchadze, A.A. 1961 Electromagnetic Properties of Plasma and Plasma-Like Media (Gosatomizdat, Moscow), p. 129 (in Russian).Google Scholar