Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:11:03.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bremsstrahlung collision contribution to entropy generation and attendant radial expansion in a self-pinched high-power relativistic electron beam propagating in a neutral gas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

J.-M. Dolique
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas, Universitd de Grenoble I. France

Abstract

In the Bennett-Nordsieck self-pinched regime of high power REB propagation in a neutral atmosphere, radial expansion is generally associated with transverse entropy generation caused by elastic electron-neutral multiple scattering: LN ∝ 1/s⊥ elast, where LN is the Nordsieck length, the distance for one e-folding of beam radius, and where s⊥ elast is the elastic collision space rate of transverse mean entropy per particle.

For ultrarelativistic beams (γ ≳ 100), the bremsstrahlung, which is the dominant energy loss process, also plays an essential rôle in the radial expansion.

A general treatment could be based on the proper time evolution equation of the beam electron pressure 4-tensor pλμ (λ, μ = 0, 1, 2, 3) where source terms linked to elastic, inelastic and bremsstrahlung collisions are introduced, as is also a closure relation. This approach is currently being studied at LPPG.

When the various implied scale lengths have clearly different orders of magnitude, a much simpler approximate description may be given.

In the λmbrems < z < λstrbrems propagation distance range, where λmbrems is the depth threshold beyond which bremsstrahlung scattering becomes multiple, and λstrbrems a characteristic distance for bremsstrahlung straggling, the rôle of bremsstrahlung in radial expansion is similar to that of elastic multiple scattering. The calculated s⊥ brems/s⊥ elast increases rapidly with both propagation distance and beam electron energy. For γ ≫ 103, the bremsstrahlung transverse entropy source term s⊥ brems is no more negligible before s⊥ elast.

In the z > λstrbrems propagation distance range, where bremsstrahlung straggling is dominant, an evaluation of its effect is deduced by applying the Haftel–Lampe–Aviles criterion to a statistical study of this straggling. A completely different estimation, based on an oversimplified version of the above-cited general thermodynamic method, gives a result which is in rather good agreement.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, W. H. 1934 Phys. Rev. 45, 890.Google Scholar
Bethe, H. A. 1953 Phys. Rev. 89, 1256.Google Scholar
BEthe, H. A. & Heitler, W. 1934 Proc. Roy. Soc. 146A, 83.Google Scholar
Dolique, J. M. 1984 Int. Conf. on Plasma Physics, Lausanne Vol. 2, p. 289.Google Scholar
Dolique, J. M., Piquemal, A., Roche, J. R. & Sortais, P. 1983 Vth Int. Conf. on High Power Particle Beams San Francisco, R. J. and Toepfer, A. J. eds. (Livermoe) Vol. 1, p. 354.Google Scholar
Dolique, J. M. & Roche, J. R. 1984 Vth IMACS Int. Symp. on Computer Methods for Partial Differential Equations. Bethlehem.Google Scholar
Dolique, J. M., Roche, J. R., Chatelin, F. 1985 Appl. Num. Math. 1, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudsmit, S. & Saunderson, J. L. 1940 Phys. Rev. 57, 24 & 58, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haftel, M. I., Lampe, M. & Aviles, J. B. 1979 Phys. Fluids 22, 2216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, T. P. & Godfrey, B. B. 1984 Phys. Fluids 27, 1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, H. W. & Motz, J. W. 1959 Rev. Mod. Phys. 31, 920.Google Scholar
Lee, E. P. 1976 Phys. Fluids, 19, 160.Google Scholar
Nordsieck, A. 1960 Private communication.Google Scholar