Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T15:56:32.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

X-ray backlighting imaging of mixed imploded targets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

B. Yaakobi ,
D. Shvarts ,
R. Epstein  and
Q. Su
B. Yaakobi
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623
D. Shvarts
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623
R. Epstein
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623
Q. Su
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Laser Energetics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14623
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The X-ray image of a compressed shell (enhanced by high-Z doping) was used in recent experiments to diagnose the effect of shell-fuel mixing. The emission ring (due to the limb effect) moves toward smaller radii due to mixing. We show here that using backlighting imaging can greatly enhance future imaging experiments. In addition to the emission ring, a backlighting absorption ring can appear around it. The absorption ring is virtually unaffected by mixing. Thus, the relative position of the two rings constitutes a mixing signature. In other words, the absorption ring delineates the colder part of the shell and is a true signature of the compression, whereas the emission ring reflects the shell material motion due to mixing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 81 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bradley, D.K. et al. 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, N. et al. 1991 Phys. Fluids A 3, 912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haan, S.W. 1989 Phys. Rev. A 39, 5812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knauer, J.P., (Ed.), 1994 LLE Review 59, 114, Report No. DOE/SF/19460–36.Google Scholar
Landen, O.L. et al. 1993 Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 38, 2083.Google Scholar
Lee, R. 1987 J. Quant. Spectr. Radiat. Transfer 38, 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindl, J.D. et al. 1992 Phys. Today 45, 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D.L. et al. 1983 J. Appl. Phys. 54, 4260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdon, C.P. et al. 1982 Phys. Fluids 25, 1653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaakobi, B. et al. 1981 Opt. Commun. 38, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaakobi, B. et al. 1995 J. X-ray Sci. Technol. 5, 73.Google Scholar
Youngs, D.L. 1984 Physica 12D, 32.Google Scholar