Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T04:24:07.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plasma diagnostics using Kα satellite emission spectroscopy in light ion beam fusion experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

J.J. MacFarlane ,
P. Wang ,
J.E. Bailey ,
T.A. Mehlhorn  and
R.J. Dukart
J.J. MacFarlane
Affiliation:
Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
P. Wang
Affiliation:
Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
J.E. Bailey
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, sNM 87185
T.A. Mehlhorn
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, sNM 87185
R.J. Dukart
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, sNM 87185
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Kα satellite spectroscopy can be a valuable technique for diagnosing conditions in high energy density plasmas. Kα emission lines are produced in intense light ion beam plasma interaction experiments as 2p electrons fill partially open Is shells created by the ion beam. In this paper, we present results from collisional-radiative equilibrium (CRE) calculations which show how Kα emission spectroscopy can be used to determine target plasma conditions in intense lithium beam experiments on Particle Beam Fusion Accelerator-II (PBFAII) at Sandia National Laboratories. In these experiments, 8–10 MeV lithium beams with intensities of 1–2 TW/cm2 irradiate planar multilayer targets containing a thin Al tracer. Kα emission spectra are measured using an X-ray crystal spectrometer with a resolution of λ/∆λ = 1200. The spectra are analyzed using a CRE model in which multilevel (NL ∼ 103) statistical equilibrium equations are solved self-consistently with the radiation field and beam properties to determine atomic level populations. Atomic level-dependent fluorescence yields and ion-impact ionization cross sections are used in computing the emission spectra. We present results showing the sensitivity of the Kα emission spectrum to temperature and density of the Al tracer. We also discuss the dependence of measured spectra on the X-ray crystal spectral resolution, and how additional diagnostic information could be obtained using multiple tracers of similar atomic number.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 231 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdallah, J. et al. 1991 Phys. Rev. A 44, 4072.Google Scholar
Apruzese, J.P. et al. 1980 J.Q.S.R.T. 23, 479.Google Scholar
Bailey, J. et al. 1990 Laser Part. Beams 8, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, J.E. et al. 1994 in preparation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiersdorfer, P. et al. 1993 Astrophys. J. 409, 846.Google Scholar
Boiko, V.A. et al. 1978 J.Q.S.R.T. 19, 11.Google Scholar
Brandt, W. & Lapicki, G. 1981 Phys. Rev. A 23, 1717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruneau, J. et al. 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1435.Google Scholar
Chen, M. & Iglesias, C. 1993 Private communication.Google Scholar
Chenais-Popovics, C. et al. 1989 Phys. Rev. A 40, 3194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, J.M. et al. 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, B. et al. 1993 Presented at the 6th International Workshop on Atomic Physics for Ion Driven Fusion, Santa Fe, NM.Google Scholar
Griem, H.R. 1968 Phys. Rev. 165, 258.Google Scholar
Hauer, A. et al. 1986 Phys. Rev. A 34, 411.Google Scholar
Hill, K.W. et al. 1976 Phys. Rev. A 13, 1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knudson, A.R. et al. 1971 Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, J.J. & Wang, P. 1992 Laser Part. Beams 10, 349.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, J.J. et al. 1993 Phys. Rev. E 47, 2748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacFarlane, J.J. et al. 1994 in preparation.Google Scholar
Madison, D.H. & Merzbacher, E. 1975 Atomic Inner-Shell Processes, Vol. 1, Craseman, D., ed. (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
Nardi, E. & Zinamon, Z. 1981. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 7075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, T.S. et al. 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3784.Google Scholar
Springer, P.T. et al. 1992 In Atomic Processes in Plasmas AIP Conference Proceedings 257 E.S. Marmer and J.L. Terry, eds. (Amer. Inst. Phys., New York).Google Scholar
Wang, P. 1991 Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Dept. of Nuclear Engr. & Engr. Physics, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Wang, P. et al. 1993a Phys. Rev. E 48, 3934.Google Scholar
Wang, P. et al. 1993b Presented at the 6th International Workshop on Atomic Physics for Ion Driven Fusion, Santa Fe, NM.Google Scholar
Wang, P. et al. 1995 Laser Part. Beams 13, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, R.L. et al. 1983 J. Phys. B 16, 835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar