Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:47:21.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of runaway electron beam current in nanosecond-pulse discharges by a Faraday cup

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2018

Cheng Zhang ,
Zehui Liu ,
Jintao Qiu ,
Han Bai ,
Fei Kong  and
Tao Shao
Cheng Zhang
Affiliation:
Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China Key Laboratory of Power Electronics and Electric Drive, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100090, China
Zehui Liu
Affiliation:
Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Jintao Qiu
Affiliation:
Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Han Bai
Affiliation:
Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Fei Kong
Affiliation:
Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China Key Laboratory of Power Electronics and Electric Drive, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100090, China
Tao Shao*
Affiliation:
Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China Key Laboratory of Power Electronics and Electric Drive, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100090, China
*
Author for correspondence: Tao Shao, Institute of Electrical Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, PO Box 2703, 100190 Beijing, China, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Measurement of runaway electron beam (REB) is essential to investigate behavior of runaway electrons produced in nanosecond-pulse gas discharge. A Faraday cup is designed to measure the REB current in nanosecond-pulse discharge when the applied dV/dt is 75 kV/ns. The Faraday cup considers the impendence match with the oscilloscope and the design of the receiving part. The experimental results show that the measured REB current has a rise time of 348 ps and a full width at half maximum of 510 ps. The comparison of the measurement results by the Faraday cup and a REB collector confirm that the Faraday cup is able to measure REB current in nanosecond-pulse discharge. Furthermore, consecutive waveforms of the REB currents show stable results by using the designed Faraday cup. In addition, effects of the interelectrode gap, gas pressure, and cathode material on the REB current are investigated by the designed Faraday cup, and the measurement results provide characteristics of REB current under different conditions. The REB current decreases when the gap spacing or gas pressure increases. REB current increases with the cathode diameter. It indicates that the high-energy electrons are generated not only at the edge of the cathode but also on the side surface of the cathode.

Keywords

Faraday cupgap spacinggas pressurenanosecond-pulse dischargerunaway electron beam
Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 369 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babaeva, NY, Zhang, C, Qiu, J, Hou, X, Tarasenko, VF and Shao, T (2017) The role of fast electrons in diffuse discharge formation: Monte Carlo simulation. Plasma Sources Science and Technology 26, 085008.Google Scholar
Babich, LP and Loiko, TV (2010) Peculiarities of detecting pulses of runaway electrons and X-rays generated by high-voltage nanosecond discharges in open atmosphere. Plasma Physics Reports 36, 263–270.Google Scholar
Chang, C, Liu, C, Chen, C, Sun, J, Liu, Y, Guo, L, Cao, Y, Wang, Y and Song, Z-M (2015) The influence of ions and the induced secondary emission on the nanosecond high-gradient microwave breakdown at metal surface. Physics of Plasmas 22, 063511.Google Scholar
Chang, C, Verboncoeur, J, Wei, F, Xie, J, Sun, J, Liu, Y, Liu, C and Wu, C (2017) Nanosecond discharge at the interfaces of flat and periodic ripple surfaces of dielectric window with air at varied pressure. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation 24, 375–381.Google Scholar
Dasilva, C, Millan, R, Mcgaw, D, Yu, CA, Putter, A, Labelle, J and Dwyer, J (2017) Laboratory measurements of X-ray emissions from centimeter-long streamer corona discharges. Research Letters 44, 11174.Google Scholar
Gu, J, Zhang, C, Wang, R, Yan, P and Shao, T (2016) Improvement of spatial uniformity of nanosecond-pulse diffuse discharges in a multi-needle-to-plane gap. Plasma Science and Technology 18, 230–235.Google Scholar
Hou, X, Zhang, C, Qiu, J, Gu, J, Wang, R and Shao, T (2017) Properties of temporal X-ray in nanosecond-pulse discharges with a tube-to-plane gap at atmospheric pressure. Acta Physica Sinica 66, 105204.Google Scholar
Hu, J and Rovey, JL (2011) Faraday cup with nanosecond response and adjustable impedance for fast electron beam characterization. Review of Scientific Instruments 82, 073504.Google Scholar
Kozyrev, A, Kozhevnikov, V, Lomaev, M, Sorokin, D, Semeniuk, N and Tarasenko, V (2016) Theoretical simulation of the picosecond runaway-electron beam in coaxial diode filled with SF6 at atmospheric pressure. EPL 114, 45001.Google Scholar
Kumar, R, Chandra, R, Mitra, S, Beg, MD, Sharma, DK, Shar-ma, A and Mittal, KC (2014) A sub-nanosecond rise time intense electron beam source. Journal of Instrumentation 9, 04017.Google Scholar
Levko, D, Krasik, YE and Tarasenko, VF (2012a) Present status of runaway electron generation in pressurized gases during nanosecond discharges. International Review of Physics 6, 165–195.Google Scholar
Levko, D, Yatom, S, Vekselman, V, Gleizer, JZ, Gurovich, VT and Krasik, YE (2012b) Numerical simulations of runaway electron generation in pressurized gases. Journal of Applied Physics 111, 013303.Google Scholar
Li, L, Liu, Y, Ge, Y, Bin, Y, Huang, J and Lin, F (2013) Generating diffuse discharge via repetitive nanosecond pulses and line-line electrodes in atmospheric air. Review of Scientific Instruments 84, 105105.Google Scholar
Li, L, Xiong, J, Cheng, Y, Peng, M and Pan, Y (2017) Geometric factors affecting capillary discharge jet length in atmospheric pressure air. Review of Scientific Instruments 88, 065109.Google Scholar
Marode, E, Dessante, P and Tardiveau, P (2016) 2D positive streamer modelling in NTP air under extreme pulse fronts. What about runaway electrons?. Plasma Sources Science and Technology 25, 064004.Google Scholar
Mesyats, GA (2017) Ecton processes in the generation of pulsed runaway electron beams in a gas discharge. Plasma Physics Reports 43, 952–956.Google Scholar
Mesyats, GA, Yalandin, MI, Sharypov, KA, Shpak, VG and Shunailov, SA (2008) Generation of a picosecond runaway electron beam in a gas gap with a nonuniform field. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 36, 2497–2507.Google Scholar
Mesyats, GA, Reutova, AG, Sharypov, KA, Shpak, VG, Shunailov, SA and Yalandin, MI (2011) On the observed energy of runaway electron beams in air. Laser and Particle Beams 29, 425–435.Google Scholar
Oreshkin, EV, Barengolts, SA, Oreshkin, VI and Mesyats, GA (2017) Parameters of a runaway electron avalanche. Physics of Plasmas 24, 103505.Google Scholar
Shao, T, Zhang, C, Niu, Z, Yan, P, Tarasenko, VF, Baksht, EKh, Burahenko, AG and Shut'ko, YV (2011) Diffuse discharge, runaway electron, and X-ray in atmospheric pressure air in an inhomogeneous electrical field in repetitive pulsed modes. Applied Physics Letters 98, 021503.Google Scholar
Shao, T, Tarasenko, VF, Zhang, C, Burachenko, AG, Rybka, DV, Kostyrya, ID, Lomaev, MI, Baksht, EK and Yan, P (2013) Application of dynamic displacement current for diagnostics of sub-nanosecond breakdowns in an inhomogeneous electric field. Review of Scientific Instruments 84, 053506.Google Scholar
Shao, T, Tarasenko, VF, Yang, W, Beloplotov, DV, Zhang, C, Lomaev, MI, Yan, P and Sorokin, DA (2014) Anode and cathode spots in high-voltage nanosecond-pulse discharge initiated by runaway electrons in air. Chinese Physics Letters 31, 084301.Google Scholar
Shao, T, Wang, R, Zhang, C and Yan, P (2018) Atmospheric-pressure pulsed discharges and plasmas: mechanism, characteristics and applications. High Voltage 3, 14–20.Google Scholar
Sharypov, KA, Shpak, VG, Shunailov, SA, Ul'masculov, MR and Yalandin, MI (2013) Time-domain reflectometry of high-voltage nonlinear loads with picosecond resolution. Review of Scientific Instruments 84, 055110.Google Scholar
Starikovskaia, SM, Anikin, NB, Pancheshnyi, SV, Zatsepin, DV and Starikovskii, AY (2001) Pulsed breakdown at high overvoltage: development, propagation and energy branching. Plasma Sources Science and Technology 10, 344–355.Google Scholar
Tarasenko, VF and Rybka, DV (2016) Methods for recording the time profile of single ultrashort pulses of electron beams and discharge currents in real-time mode. High Voltage 1, 43–51.Google Scholar
Tarasenko, VF, Shunailov, SA, Shpak, VG and Kostyrya, ID (2005) Supershort electron beam from air filled diode at atmospheric pressure. Laser and Particle Beams 23, 545–551.Google Scholar
Tarasenko, VF, Baksht, EK, Burachenko, AG, Kostyrya, ID, Lomaev, MI and Rybka, DV (2008) Generation of supershort avalanche electron beams and formation of diffuse discharges in different gases at high pressure. Plasma Devices and Operations 16, 267–298.Google Scholar
Tarasenko, VF, Baksht, EK, Beloplotov, DV, Burachenko, A, Kostyrya, ID, Lomaev, MI, Rybka, DV and Sorokin, DA (2015) On the parameters of runaway electron beams and on electrons with an “anomalous” energy at a subnanosecond breakdown of gases at atmospheric pressure. JETP Letters 102, 350–354.Google Scholar
Tarasenko, VF, Lomaev, MI, Beloplotov, DV and Sorokin, DA (2016) Runaway electrons during subnanosecond breakdowns in high-pressure gases. High Voltage 1, 181–191.Google Scholar
Tarasenko, VF, Zhang, C, Kozyrev, AV, Sorokin, DA, Hou, X, Semeniuk, NS, Burachenko, AG, Yan, P, Kozhevnikov, YV, Baksht, EK and Lomaev, MI (2017) Influence of electrode spacing and gas pressure on parameters of a runaway electron beam generating during the nanosecond breakdown in SF6 and nitrogen. High Voltage 2, 49–55.Google Scholar
Tarasova, LV, Khudyakova, LN, Loiko, TV and Tsukerman, VA (1974) The fast electrons and X-ray radiation of nanosecond pulsed discharges in gases under 0.1–760 Torr. Technical Physics 44, 564.Google Scholar
Yatom, S, Shlapakovski, A, Beilin, L, Stambulchik, E, Tskhai, S and Krasik, YE (2016) Recent studies on nanosecond-timescale pressurized gas discharges. Plasma Sources Science and Technology 25, 064001.Google Scholar
Zhang, C, Shao, T, Yu, Y, Niu, Z, Yan, P and Zhou, Y (2010) Detection of X-ray emission in a nanosecond discharge in air at atmospheric pressure. Review of Scientific Instruments 81, 123501.Google Scholar
Zhang, C, Tarasenko, VF, Shao, T, Beloplotov, DV, Lomaev, MI, Sorokin, DA and Yan, P (2014) Generation of super-short avalanche electron beams in SF6. Laser and Particle Beams 32, 331–341.Google Scholar
Zhang, C, Tarasenko, VF, Gu, J, Baksht, EK, Wang, R, Yan, P and Shao, T (2015) A comparison between spectra of runaway electron beams in SF6 and air. Physics of Plasmas 22, 123516.Google Scholar
Zhang, C, Tarasenko, VF, Gu, J, Baksht, EK, Beloplotov, DV, Burachenko, AG, Yan, P, Lomaev, MI and Shao, T (2016) Supershort avalanche electron beam in SF6 and krypton. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams 19, 030402.Google Scholar