Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T07:59:18.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Charged particle spectra from U-235 and B-10 micropellets and slab coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

A. K. Chung
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia, Missouri 65211
M. A. Prelas
Affiliation:
College of Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia, Missouri 65211

Abstract

A novel method of utilizing fluorescence generated from the products of nuclear reactions offers the prospect of compact, high efficiency, multi-megajoule lasers. To overcome the problems associated with traditional laser (or energy converter)-fissile material interfaces, such as a uranium coating (low power density and low efficiency) or a gaseous uranium compound (low power density and deleterious effects on the laser kinetics and photon transport), a method suggested elsewhere of employing a reactor using a uranium aerosol fuel, interspersed with a fluorescer medium, is briefly reviewed. The charged particles produced by nuclear reactions in the fuel produce fluorescence in the core region of the reactor, through interactions with the fluorescer. This fluorescence can then be concentrated, to increase the effective power density in the laser medium, and used to drive a photolytic laser.

One key issue in the above process is the charged particle spectrum from the fissile aerosol. These issues can be addressed theoretically based on the Dirac chord length distribution technique and an Arcen's function. The charged particle spectrum from a UO2 coating has been generated and benchmarked with the experimental data of Kahn et al., and Redmond et al. Agreement is generally good except near the end of the fission fragment tracks. The validity of this simple technique in approximating the rate of ion energy loss lends confidence to the generation of fission fragment spectra for other geometries (i.e. spherical in which transport efficiencies of over 60% appear achievable) using U, UO2 and U3O8. Work is also extended to the case of B-10 in a variety of configurations which are frequently used in modern energy conversion experimental devices.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bichsel, H. & Porter, L. 1982 Phys. Rev. A25 2499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boody, F. & Prelas, M. 1983 Excimer Lasers-83,AIP Conf. Proc. #100, AIP, NY, 349354.Google Scholar
Boody, F., Prelas, M., Anderson, J., Nagalingham, S. & Miley, G. 1978 Radiation Energy Conversion In Space, Billman, K., Editor, AIAA, NY, 379.Google Scholar
Guyot, J. C., Miley, G. H. & Verdeyen, J. T. 1972 Nucl. Sci. Engr. 48, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, S., Harman, R. & Forgue, V. 1965. Nucl. Sci. Engr. 25, 359.Google Scholar
Lewis, E. 1966 Nucl. Sci. Engr. 25, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, R. & Miley, G. 1974 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. PS-2, 198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miley, G. H. 1977 Laser Interaction and Related Plasma Phenomena, Chap. 4A, pp 181229, Schwarz, H. and Hora, H., editors, Plenum Press, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prelas, M. & Boody, F. 1982 IEEE Int. Conf. on Plasma Sci.IEEE cat. no. 82CH1770–7.Google Scholar
Prelas, M. & Boody, F. 1983 IEEE Int. Conf. on Plasma Sci.,IEEE cat. no. 83CH1847–7.Google Scholar
Prelas, M. & Jones, G. 1982 J. Appl. Phys. 53, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prelas, M. & Loyalka, S. 1981 Progress in Nuclear Energy, 8, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redmond, R., Khingensmith, R. & Anno, J. 1962 J. Appl. Phys. 33, 3383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehring, B. & Zediker, M. 1983 Personal Communication.Google Scholar