Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:03:28.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sex, attitudes, and the assibilation of /r/ among young people in San Luis Potosí, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Dorothy A. Rissel
Dorothy A. Rissel
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes the assibilation of /r/ among young people in San Luis Potosí, Mexico, in light of previous research on women's speech in language change. It is demonstrated that assibilation, an innovation known to have first appeared in the speech of women of the middle and upper social echelons, is closely associated with sex, sociocultural level, and attitude toward traditional male and female roles. These attitudes are suggested as a factor that plays an important role in the dynamics of the change, showing opposite effects among young men and women. That is, young men with traditional attitudes assibilate least, whereas young women with traditional attitudes assibilate most frequently. Parallels between this study and one of a similar innovation in Argentinian Spanish suggest a generalized pattern of change in which variables introduced by women of the middle and upper social echelons become markers of gender display in the lower classes, where they grow to be favored by women and avoided by men. The discovery of the role of attitude toward traditional sex roles in this pattern of change is unique to the present study.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , October 1989 , pp. 269 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvar, Manuel. (1956). Diferencias en el habla de Puebla de don Fadrique. Revista de filología española 40:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvar, Manuel. (1969). Hombres y mujeres en las hablas andaluzas. In Alvar, M., Variedad y unidad del español: Estudios desde la historia. Madrid: Editorial Prensa Española. 129–146.Google Scholar
Boyd-Bowman, Peter. (1960). El habla de Guanajuato. Mexico: UNAM.Google Scholar
Canfield, D. L. (1981). Spanish pronunciation in the Americas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Delphy, Christine. (1981). Women in stratification studies. In Roberts, H. (ed.), Doing feminist research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 114–128.Google Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, María Beatriz. (1973). Comportamiento ante -s de hablantes femeninos y masculinos del español bonaerense. Romance Philology 27:50–58.Google Scholar
Fontanella de Weinberg, María Beatriz. (1979). Dinámica social de un cambio lingüístico. Mexico: UNAM.Google Scholar
Harris, James. (1969). Spanish phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: A nonlinear analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Yeager, Malcah & Steiner, R. (1972). A quantitative study of a sound change in progress. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Marden, Charles. (1938). The phonology of the Spanish dialect of Mexico City. Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, 1896. Trans. by H. Cruz A. & P. Henríquez U. Boletín de dialectología hispanoamericana 4:87–188.Google Scholar
Matluck, Joseph. (1952). Rasgos peculiares de la ciudad de México y del Valle. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 6:109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno de Alba, José G. (1972). Frecuencias de la asibilación de /r/ y /rr/ en México. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 21:363–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. (1981). The effect of two interacting extralinguistic variables on patterns of variation in urban vernacular speech. In Sankoff, D. & Cedergren, H. (eds.), Variation omnibus. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc. 161–168.Google Scholar
Nichols, Patricia. (1983). Linguistic options and choices for black women in the rural South. In Thorne, B., Kramarae, C. & Henley, N. (eds.), Language, gender and society. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Perissinotto, Giorgio. (1972). Distribución demográfica de la asibilación de vibrantes en el habla de la Ciudad de México. Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 21:73–79.Google Scholar
Rissel, D. (1981). Diferencias entre el habla femenina y la masculina en español. Thesaurus 36:1–18.Google Scholar
Salvador, Gregorio. (1952). Fonética masculina y fonética femenina en el habla de Vertientes y Tarifa (Granada). Orbis 1:19–24.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie & Henley, Nancy. (1975). Difference and dominance: An overview of language, gender and society. In Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 5–42.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1:179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1983). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar