Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:53:58.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender and language change in Old Norse sentential negatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 September 2015

Tam Blaxter
Tam Blaxter*
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One consistent finding across sociolinguistic studies is the tendency for female speakers to lead in ongoing change. Different explanations have been proposed for this and a key method of testing these explanations is to identify whether the pattern occurs in the languages of a wider range of societies than have been studied thus far. Historical societies are relatively understudied in this regard, but undertaking variationist research into gender in historical varieties presents many challenges. One way to overcome these is to examine variation internal to fiction data. This paper presents an analysis of the effect of gender on the adverb selected for sentential negation in Old Norse prose fiction. It finds that female characters lead consistently in this change over time. In doing so, it demonstrates the feasibility of using fiction data when examining the effect of gender in historical varieties such as Old Norse.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , October 2015 , pp. 349 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, James N. (1984). Female speech in Latin comedy. Antichthon 18:43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N. (2005). Neglected evidence for female speech in Latin. Classical Quarterly 55(2):582–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, Theodore Murdock. (2006). The growth of the medieval Icelandic sagas (1180–1280). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anthony, Lawrence. (2012). AntConc: A freeware concordance program for Windows, Mactintosh OS X, and Linux. Available at: http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/software.html. Accessed November 30, 2012.Google Scholar
Archer, Dawn, & Culpeper, Jonathan. (2003). Sociopragmatic annotation: New directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics. In Wilson, A., Rayson, P., & McEnery, T. (eds.), Corpus linguistics by the Lune. Lódź Studies in Language 8. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. 37–58.Google Scholar
Arnaud, René. (1998). The development of the progressive in 19th century English: A quantitative survey. Language Variation and Change 10(2):123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, David. (1984). Female speech in Menander. Antichthon 18:24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul. (2008). Sexed texts: Language, sexuality and gender. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Bauer, Robert S. (1982). Lexical diffusion in Hong Kong Cantonese: “Five” leads the way. Paper presented at the 8th Annual BLS Meeting, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, & Finegan, Edward. (1997). Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Nevalainen, T. & Kahlas-Tarkka, L. (eds.), To explain the present: Studies in the changing English language in honour of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Société néophilologique. 253–275.Google Scholar
Blaxter, Tam T. (2013). Sociolinguistic variation in the Old Icelandic Family Sagas. MPhil dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Brickell, Chris. (2006). The sociological construction of gender and sexuality. Sociological Review 54(1):87–113. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00603.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. (2003). Gender issues in language change. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 23:187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Deborah. (2007). The myth of Mars and Venus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Canary, Daniel J., & Hause, Kimberly S. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication? Communications Quarterly 41(2):129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. (1992). Linguistic correlates of gender and sex. English World-Wide 13:173–218. doi:10.1075/eww.13.2.02cha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. (2003). Sociolinguistic theory. 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Cleasby, Richard, Vigfússon, Guðbrandur, & Dasent, George Webbe. (1894). An Icelandic-English dictionary, based on the ms. collections of the late Richard Cleasby. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. (2009). Historical sociopragmatics: An introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10(2):179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, & Kytö, Merja. (2010). Early Modern English dialogues: Spoken interaction as writing. Studies in English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard, & Foulkes, Paul. (1999). Derby and Newcastle: Instrumental phonetics and variationist studies. In Docherty, G. & Foulkes, P. (eds.), Urban voices. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (1998). Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In Coates, J. (ed.), Language and gender: A reader. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. 64–75.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope, & McConnel-Ginnet, Sally. (1999). New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research. Language in Society 28(2):185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. (2000). Dative vs. nominative: Changes in quirky subjects in Icelandic. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 8:27–44.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. (2002a). Changes in subject case-marking in Icelandic. In Lightfoot, D. (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 196–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur. (2002b). Negation in C: The syntax of negated verbs in Old Norse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25(2):190–224.Google Scholar
Gauchat, Louis. (1905). L'unité phonétique dans le patois d'une commune. Aus Romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen: Festschrift Heinrich Morf zur Feier seiner fünfundzwanzigjährigen Lehrtätigkeit von zeinen Schülern dargebracht. 175–232.Google Scholar
Glauser, Jürg. (2000). Sagas of the Icelanders (Íslendinga sögur) and þættir as the literary representation of a new social space. In Ross, M. Clunies (ed.), Old Icelandic Literature and Society, trans. John Clifton-Everest. Cambridge Studies in Medieval Literature 42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, John. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationships. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. (2009). Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Grob, Lindsey M., Meyers, Renee A., & Schuh, Renee. (1997). Powerful/powerless language use in group interactions: Sex differences or similarities? Communications Quarterly 45(3):282–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgadóttir, Sigrún, Valsdóttir, Eyrún, Rögnvaldsdóttir, Auður, & Stefánsdóttir, Hjördís. (2007–present). Mörkuð íslensk málheild. Reykjavík: Stofnun Árna Magnússonar í íslenskum fræðum. Available at: http://mim.hi.is/index.php. Accessed May 12, 2012.Google Scholar
Hellevik, Alf. (1966). Norsk ordbok: ordbok over det norske folkemålet og det nynorske skriftmålet. Oslo: Norske samlaget.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. (1997). Setting new standards: Sound change and gender in New Zealand. English World-Wide 18(1):107–142. doi:10.1075/eww.18.1.06hol.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Magnus. (2012). The Old Bailey Corpus: spoken English in the 18th and 19th centuries. Seminar paper presented at the Digital History, Institute of Historical Research, University of London. Available at: http://www.history.ac.uk/podcasts/digital-history/old-bailey-corpus-spoken-english-18th-and-19th-centuries. Accessed March 20, 2014.Google Scholar
Hyde, Janet Shibley. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist 60(6):581–592. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyde, Janet Shibley. (2006). Gender similarities still rule. American Psychologist 61(6):641–642. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.6.641b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jochens, Jenny. (1995). Women in Old Norse society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, Agnieszka. (1999). Child-to-parent address change in Polish. In Jahr, E. H. (ed.), Language change: Advances in historical sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiełkiewicz-Janowiak, Agnieszka. (2012). Class, age and gender-based patterns. In Hernández-Campoy, J. M. & Conde-Silvestre, J. C. (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja. (1993). Third-person present singular verb inflection in early British and American English. Language Variation and Change 5(2):113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja. (1997). Be/have + past participle: The choice of the auxiliary with intransitives from Late Middle to Modern English. In Rissanen, M., Kytö, M., & Heikkonen, K. (eds.), English in transition: Corpus-based studies in linguistic variation and genre styles. Topics in English Linguistics 23. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 17–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2(2):205–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Leeuw van Weenen, Andrea de. (1987). Möðruvallabók, AM 132 fol. Vol. 2. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula. (2012). Why and what in Early Modern English drama. In Markus, M., Iyeiri, Y., Heuberger, R., & Chamson, E. (eds.), Middle and modern English corpus linguistics: A multi-dimensional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 177–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclagan, Margaret A. (2000). How long have women been leading language change? In Holmes, J. (ed.), Gendered speech in social context: Perspectives from gown and town. Wellington: Victoria University Press. 87–98.Google Scholar
Magnússon, Ásgeir Blondal. (1989). Íslensk orðsifjabók. Reykjavík: Orðabók Háskólans: Mál og menning.Google Scholar
Meluzzi, Chiara. (2010). “You” and “me” in Ancient Greek: the case of three “female” comedies. In Hill, E. & Schumacher, S. (eds.), Greek and Latin from an Indo-European Perspective 3 (GLIEP 3): Proceedings of the Conference held at the Comenius University Bratislava July 8th–10th 2010. Vol. 2. Wien: International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction. 81–100.Google Scholar
Milroy, James, Milroy, Lesley, Hartley, Sue, & Walshaw, David. (1994). Glottal stops and Tyneside glottalization: Competing patterns of variation and change in British English. Language Variation and Change 6:327–357. doi:10.1017/S095439450000171X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mørck, Endre. (1999). Sociolinguistic studies on the basis of medieval Norwegian charters. In Jahr, E. H. (ed.), Language change: Advances in historical sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 263–290.Google Scholar
Mossman, Judith. (2001). Women's speech in Greek tragedy: The case of Electra and Clytemnestra in Euripedes’ “Electra.” Classical Quarterly 51(2):374–384. doi:10.1093/cq/51.2.374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. (1991). But, only, just: Focusing adverbial change in Modern English 1500–1900. Mémoires de La Société Néophilolologique de Helsinki Tome 51. Helsinki: Société néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. (1996). Gender difference. In Nevalainen, T. & Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language history: Studies based on the Corpus of Early English correspondence. Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics 15. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi. 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. (2005). Gender stereotypes in Late Modern English. In McCafferty, K., Bull, T., & Killie, K. (eds.), Contexts—historical, social, linguistic: Studies in celebration of Toril Swan. Bern: Peter Lang. 129–144.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. (2003). Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stuart England. Longman Linguistics Library. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena, & Mannila, Heikki. (2011). The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change. Language Variation and Change 23(1):1–43. doi:10.1017/S0954394510000207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nurmi, Arja. (1999). A social history of periphrastic DO. Mémoires de La Société Néophilolologique de Helsinki 56. Helsinki: Société néophilologique.Google Scholar
Occhi, Deborah J., SturtzSreetharan, Cindi L., & Shibamoto Smith, Janet S. (2010). Finding Mr Right: New looks at gendered modernity in Japanese televised romances. Japanese Studies 30(3):409–425. doi:10.1080/10371397.2010.518605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palander-Collin, Minna. (1999). Grammaticalization and social embedding: I think and methinks in Middle and Early Modern English. Mémoires de La Société Néophilolologique de Helsinki 55. Helsinki: Libella Painotalo Oy.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, & Malvar, Elisabete. (2007). Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change. Probus 19(1):121–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulsiano, Philip, Wolf, Kirsten., Acker, Paul, & Fry, Donald. K. (eds.). (1993). Medieval Scandinavia: An encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur, & Helgadóttir, Sigrún. (2011). Morphological tagging of Old Norse texts and its use in studying syntactic variation and change. In Sporleder, C., van den Bosch, A., & Zervanou, K. (eds.), Language technology for cultural heritage. Berlin: Springer. 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur, Ingason, Anton Karl, Sigurðsson, Einar Freyr, & Wallenberg, Joel. (2012). The Icelandic Parsed Historical Corpus (IcePaHC). In Calzolari, N., Choukri, K., Declerck, T., Doğan, M. U., Maegaard, B., Mariani, J., Odijk, J., & Piperidis, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'12). Istanbul, Turkey: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). 1977–1984.Google Scholar
Rydén, Matts, & Brorström, Sverker. (1987). The be/have variation with intransitives in English. With special reference to the Late Modern Period. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis: Stockholm Studies in English 70. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Sandøy, Helge. (2005). The typological development of the Nordic languages I: Phonology. In Bandle, O., Jahr, E. H., Karker, A., Naumann, H.-P., Teleman, U., & Braunmüller, K. (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages. New York: Walter de Gruyter. 1852–1871.Google Scholar
Schulte, Michael. (2005). Phonological developments from Old Nordic to Early Modern Nordic I: West Scandinavian. In Bandle, O., Jahr, E. H., Karker, A., Naumann, H.-P., Teleman, U., & Braunmüller, K. (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages. New York: Walter de Gruyter. 1081–1096.Google Scholar
Shibamoto, Janet S. (1987). The womanly woman: Manipulation of stereotypical and non-stereotypical features of Japanese female speech. In Philips, S. U., Steele, S., & Tanz, C. (eds.), Comparative perspectives on gender, sex and language. New York: Cambridge University Press. 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibamoto Smith, Janet S. (2004). Language and gender in the (hetero)romance: “Reading” the ideal hero/ine through lover's dialogue in Japanese romance fiction. In Okamoto, S. & Shibamoto Smith, J. S. (eds.), Japanese language, gender, and ideology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shibamoto Smith, Janet S., & Occhi, Deborah J. (2009). The green leaves of love: Japanese romantic heroines, authentic femininity, and dialect. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(4):524–546. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00422.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry. (1994). “Dative sickness” in Germanic. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12(4):675–736. doi:10.1007/BF00992930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, Alan H. (1995). The language of Athenian women. In de Martino, F. & Sommerstein, A. H. (eds.), Lo spettacolo delle voci. Bari: Levante. 61–85.Google Scholar
Sunderland, Jane. (2004). Gendered discourses. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., & D'Arcy, Alexandra. (2009). Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1):58–108. doi:10.1353/lan.0.0084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. (1991). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
TEI Consortium (ed.). (2007). TEI P5: Guidelines for electronic text encoding and interchange. 2.1.0. Last updated June 17, 2012. Available at: http://www.tei-c.org/Guidelines/P5/. Accessed August 16, 2012.Google Scholar
Tekstlaboratoriet. (2001). Frekvensordlister for norsk talespråk og skriftspråk. ILN, Universitetet i Oslo. Available at: http://www.tekstlab.uio.no/frekvensordlister/. Accessed September 13, 2013.Google Scholar
Thelander, Mats. (2005). Sociolinguistics structures chronologically. II: Swedish. In Bandle, O., Jahr, E. H., Karker, A., Naumann, H.-P., Teleman, U., & Braunmüller, K. (eds.), The Nordic languages: An international handbook of the history of the North Germanic languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1896–1906.Google Scholar
Torp, Alf. (1919). Nynorsk etymologisk ordbok. Kristiania: H. Aschehoug & O. (W. Nygaard).Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2):179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1974). Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 3(2):215–246. doi:10.1017/S0047404500004358.Google Scholar
Willi, Andreas. (2003). The languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of linguistic variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, David, Breitbarth, Anne, & Lucas, Christopher. (2013). The history of negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean. Vol. 1: Case studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Werner. (1999). Sociolinguistics and dead languages. In Jahr, E. H. (ed.), Language change: Advances in historical sociolinguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar