Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:24:29.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disfluencies in the analysis of speech data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Anthony Julius Naro  and
Maria Marta Pereira Scherre
Anthony Julius Naro
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Maria Marta Pereira Scherre
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In our study of concord phenomena in spoken Brazilian Portuguese we found disfluencies, including apparent corrections, in about 15% of the relevant tokens in our corpus of recorded speech data. Disfluencies have very little effect on the rate of marking. When fluency is included in a variable rule analysis as a factor group containing categories for different types of disfluency, as well as for data without any disfluency, it is not selected as statistically significant. Furthermore, separate analyses of all data, only fluent data, and only disfluent data revealed no significant changes in the numerical results obtained for other factor groups. We conclude that, at least insofar as the variable phenomena we studied are concerned, speech is not overly laden with errors; there is nothing in the data to mislead the language learner.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , March 1996 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braga, Maria Luiza. (1986). Construções de tópico de discurso. In Naro, Anthony J. et al. (eds.), Relatório final de pesquisa: Projeto Subsídios do Projeto “Censo” à educação. Vol. III. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. 393–453.Google Scholar
Braga, Maria Luiza. (n.d.). Esta dupla manifestação de sujeito, ela é condicionada lingüisticamente. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Braga, Maria Luiza, & Mollica, Maria Cecilia. (1986). Marcas segmentais e/ou supra-segmentais entre o sujeito e o predicado e sua função discursiva. Série Estudos 16. Curso de Letras—Centro de Ciências Humanas e Letras das Faculdades Integradas de Uberaba.Google Scholar
Cunha, C., & Cintra, L. (1985). Nova gramática do português contemporâneo. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira.Google Scholar
Faraco, E. C., & Moura, F. M. (1992). Gramática. São Paulo: Ática.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Mollica, Maria Cecilia. (1984). Alguns fatores da pausa entre sujeito e verbo. ABRALIN—Associação Brasileira de Linguística. Boletim 6:141–158.Google Scholar
Mollica, Maria Cecilia, & Quental, Violeta Dantas Barbosa. (1988). A vírgula como reflexo da pausa e da entonaçāo entre sujeito e verbo. In Anais (Encontro Nacional de Lingüística IX, 1984). Rio de Janeiro: PUC. 26–43.Google Scholar
Naro, Anthony J. (1981). The social and structural dimensions of a syntactic change. Language 57:63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. (1988). VARBRUL programs. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Pontes, Eunice Souza Lima. (1986). Sujeito: Da sintaxe ao discurso. São Paulo: Ática.Google Scholar
Pontes, Eunice Souza Lima. (1987). O tópico no português do Brasil. São Paulo: Pontes.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David. (1988). Variable rules. In Ammon, Ulrich, Dittmar, Norbert, & Mattheir, Klaus J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. New York: Walter de Gruyter. 984–987.Google Scholar
Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira, & Naro, Anthony Julius. (1991). Marking in discourse: Birds of a feather. Language Variation and Change 3:23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherre, Maria Marta Pereira, & Naro, Anthony Julius. (1993). Duas dimensões do paralelismo formal no português popular do Brasil. Delta 9:1–14.Google Scholar
Silva, Giselle M. de Oliveira. (in press). Variáveis sociais e perfil do Corpus “Censo.”. In de O. Silva, G. M. & Scherre, M. M. P. (eds.), Padrões sociolingüísticos — Análises de fenômenos variáveis do português falado no Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro.Google Scholar