Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:34:01.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The devoicing of fricatives in Standard Dutch: A real-time study based on radio recordings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Hans van de Velde ,
Marinel Gerritsen  and
Roeland van Hout
Hans van de Velde
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen
Marinel Gerritsen
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen
Roeland van Hout
Affiliation:
University of Tilburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article gives a detailed analysis of devoicing of the voiced fricatives /v/, /z/, /y/ in two varieties of Standard Dutch: Southern Standard Dutch (as spoken in Belgium) and Northern Standard Dutch (as spoken in The Netherlands). The study is based on archived recordings of radio broadcasts from 1935 to 1993. First, our study shows a divergence between Southern and Northern Standard Dutch in the pronunciation of voiced fricatives in this period. In The Netherlands there is a strong tendency towards devoicing, but in Belgium this tendency is very weak. Second, this study offers insight into the linguistic path of this change: partially voiced compromise variants play an important role, and devoicing is favored in word-initial position. Finally, our study shows the benefits of a retrospective trend study on the basis of radio recordings. In comparison with traditional real-time studies, it offers more insight into the social and linguistic embedding of changes in progress. Its results are also more reliable than those of apparent-time research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , July 1996 , pp. 149 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balise, R. R., & Diehl, R. L. (1994). Some distributional facts about fricatives and a perceptual explanation. Phonetica 51:99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L. (1985). Tracing phonetic change in the received pronunciation of British English. Journal of Phonetics 13:61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar
Blancquaert, E. (1934). Praktische Uitspraakleer van de Nederlandse Taal. De Sikkel:Antwerpen.Google Scholar
Booij, G. (1995). The Phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brink, L., & Lund, J. (1975). Dansk Rigsmål I-II. Lydudviklingen siden 1840 med særligt henblink på sociolekterne i København. Gyldendal: Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Cammenga, J., & Van Reenen, P. (1980). Boekbespreking van “Trommelen en Zonneveled Inleiding in de Generatieve Fonologie” GLOT 3:183–190.Google Scholar
Cassier, L., & Van de Craen, P. (1986). Vijftig jaar evolutie van het Nederlands. In Creten, J. (Ed.), Werk in uitvoering. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. C. (1988). The spread of language change: verifying inferences of linguistic diffusion. In Lowenberg, P. H. (Ed.), GURT '87. Language spread and language policy: Issues, implications and case studies. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A., Ebeling, C. L., Fokkema, K., & van Holk, A. G. F. (1971). Fonologie van het Nederlands en het fries. Inleiding tot de moderne klankleer. 's-Gravenhage: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Collins, B., & Mees, I. (1981). The sounds of English and Dutch. The Hague: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
Debrock, M. (1977). An acoustic correlate of the force of articulation. Journal of Phonetics 5:61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, G. J. (1992). The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, B. C. (1983). Dutch. A linguistic history of Holland and Belgium. Leiden: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1975). Methodischen zu Allegro-Regeln. In Dressler, W. U. & Mares, F. V. (Eds.), Phonologica 1972. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. 219–234.Google Scholar
Escure, G. J. (1975). Weakening and deletion processes in language change. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University (University Microfilms International: Ann Arbor, 1978).Google Scholar
Foley, J. (1977). Foundations of theoretical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geerts, G. (1988). Language legislation in Belgium and the balance of power in Walloon-Flemish relationships. In van Hout, R. & Knops, U. (Eds.), Language attitudes in the Dutch language area. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Goossens, J. (1974). Historische Phonologie des Niederländischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1981a). Voiced fricatives in Dutch: sources and present-day usage. Proceedings Institute of Phonetics Nijmegen 5:84–95.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1981b). Measuring the acceptability of voiced fricatives in Dutch. Proceedings Insitute of Phonetics Nijmegen 5:96–129.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (1992). Dutch. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 22:45–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C., & Bremmer, R. (1983). voiced fricatives in Dutch: Sources and Present-day usage. Nowele 2:55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellinga, W. Gs. (1938). De opbouw van de algemeen beschaafde uitspraak van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandse Uitgeversmaatschappij.Google Scholar
Hermann, E. (1929). Lautveränderungen in der Individualsprache einer Mundart. Nachrichten der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Philosophisch-historische Klasse 11:195–214.Google Scholar
Haggard, M. (1978). The devoicing of voiced fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 6:95–102.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1951). Age-grading and linguistic continuity. Language 26:449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New york City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, G. (1980). B.B.C. English and Deutsche Rundfunk Sprache: A comparative and historical analysis of the language of the radio. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 26:75–100.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. M. (1985). Spanish in United States broadcasting. In Elias-Olivares, L., Leone, E. A., Cisneros, R. & Guttierez, J. R. (Eds.), Spanish language use and public life in the United States. Berlin: Mouton. 217–233.Google Scholar
Mees, I., & Collins, B. (1982). A phonetic description of the consonant system of Standard Dutch (ABN). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 12:2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B. (1991). The CHILDES Project: Tools for analyzing talk. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. (1981). The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A. & Miller, M. F. (eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society. 178–203.Google Scholar
Paunonen, H. (1994). Language change in apparent time and real time. Paper presented at NWAVE-XXIII,Stanford University.Google Scholar
Prince, E. F. (1987). Sarah Gorby, Yiddish folksinger: A case study of dialect shift. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 67:83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slis, I. H. (1985). The voiced-voiceless distinction and assimilation of voice in Dutch Helmond: Wibro.Google Scholar
Slis, I. H. & van Heugten, M. (1989). Voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch fricatives. In Bennis, H. & van Kemenade, A. (Eds.), Linguistics in The Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris. 123–132.Google Scholar
Strassner, E. (1983). Rolle und Ausmass dialektalen Sprachgebrauchs in den Massenmedien und in der Werbung. In Besch, W., Knoop, U., Putschke, W., & Weigand, H. Ernst (Eds.), Dialektologie. Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektforschung. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1509–1525.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1988). Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic canges in an English urban dialect. English Worldwide 9:33–49.Google Scholar
Thibault, P., & Vincent, D. (1990). Un corpus de français parlé. Montreal: Recherches Sociolinguistiques.Google Scholar
Van de Craen, P. & Willemyns, R. (1988). The standardization of Dutch in Flanders. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 73:45–64.Google Scholar
Vandeputte, O., Vincent, P., & Hermans, T. (1995). Dutch. The language of twenty million Dutch and Flemish people. Lauwe: Stichting Ons Erfdeel.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, H. (1994). “Amaai mijn oren!” Variation and change of standard Dutch /y/ between 1935 and 1993. In Baumann, M., Bos, P., Boves, L., Hakkenberg, G., & Planken, B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the CLS Ph.D. Conference 1993. Nijmegen: CLS.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, H. (1996). Variatie en verandering in het gesproken Standaard-Nederlands (1935–1993). Doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, B. (1969). Foniek van het Nederlands. Den Haag: Van Goor Zonen.Google Scholar
Van de Broecke, M. P. R. & van Heuven, V. J. J. P. (1979). One or two velar fricatives in Dutch? In Anniversaries in phonetics: Studia gratulatoria dedicated to Hendrik Mol. Amsterdam: Instituut voor Fonetiek (UvA).Google Scholar
Van Hout, R. (1989). De structuur van taalvariatie. Een sociolinguïstisch onderzoek naar het stadsdialect van Nijmegen. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Van Poecke, L., & Van den Bulck, H. (1991). Taal en Omroep. Een schets van de evolutie in het taalbeleid van de Vlaamse Openbare Omroep. In Beheydt, L. (Ed.), Taal en Omroep. Voorzetten 33. Gravenhage: Stichting Bibliographica Neerlandica's.Google Scholar
Van Wijk, N. (1939). Phonologie. Een hoofdstuk uit de structurele taalewetenschap. Den Haag: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Voortman, B. (1994). Regionale variatie in het taalgebruik van notabelen. Een sociolinguïstisch onderzoek in Middelburg, Roermond en Zutphen. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar
Willemyns, R. (1988). Belgium. In Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., & Mattheier, K. J. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics. An international handbook of the science of language and society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1254–1257.Google Scholar
Zwaardemaker, H., & Eijkman, L. P. H. (1928). Leerboek der phonetiek. Inzonderheid met betrekking tot het Standaard-Nederlandsch. Haarlem: De erven F. Bohn.Google Scholar