Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T10:10:47.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sociolinguistic convergence and social interactions within a group of preschoolers: A longitudinal study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2014

Aurélie Nardy ,
Jean-Pierre Chevrot  and
Stéphanie Barbu
Aurélie Nardy
Affiliation:
University of Grenoble Alps
Jean-Pierre Chevrot
Affiliation:
University of Grenoble Alps
Stéphanie Barbu
Affiliation:
University of Rennes1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sociolinguistic studies have shown that linguistic usage is closely related to social relationships and interactions between individuals. This has been established in adults and adolescents but developmental studies involving children are lacking. This paper studies whether and how peers influence the acquisition of social dialects in young children by using direct observations and quantitative analyses of spontaneous peer interactions and relationships at kindergarten. The longitudinal follow-up of one group of French-speaking children 4 to 5 years of age shows that the individual scores of sociolinguistic variables converge after one year of frequent contact. Moreover, we find that children who interact more frequently adopt similar usage of sociolinguistic variables, whereas other factors have no influence (teacher's speech, child's awareness of standard sociolinguistics norms, reported interpersonal attraction). These results provide the first evidence that social interactions within the peer group do have an influence on children's linguistic usage through daily interactions at an early age.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , October 2014 , pp. 273 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ågren, John. (1973). Étude sur quelques liaisons facultatives dans le français de conversation radiophonique. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.Google Scholar
Altmann, Jeanne. (1974). Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49(3):227–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armstrong, Nigel. (1996). Variable deletion of French /l/: Linguistic, social and stylistic factors. Journal of French Language Studies 6(1):1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel. (2001). Social and stylistic variation in spoken French: A comparative approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashby, William. (1981). French liaison as a sociolinguistic phenomenon. In Cressey, W. & Napoli, D. (eds.), Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages. 9th ed.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 46–57.Google Scholar
Asher, Steven R., Singleton, Louise C., Tinsley, Barbara R., & Hymel, Shelley. (1979). A reliable sociometric measure for preschool children. Developmental Psychology 15(4):443–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbu, Stéphanie. (2003). Stability and flexibility in preschoolers' social networks: A dynamic analysis of socially directed behavior allocation. Journal of Comparative Psychology 117(4):429–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbu, Stéphanie. (2006). Similarity of behavioral profiles among friends in early childhood. Child Health and Education 1(1):27–40.Google Scholar
Barbu, Stéphanie, Nardy, Aurélie, Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, & Juhel, Jacques. (2013). Language evaluation and use during early childhood: Adhesion to social norms or integration of environmental regularities? Linguistics 51(2):381–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaulieu, Louise, & Cichocki, Wladyslaw. (2002). Le concept de réseau social dans une communauté acadienne rurale. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 47 (3–4):123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. (1933). Language. London: G. Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Bukowski, William M., & Hoza, Betsy. (1989). Popularity and friendship: Issues in theory, measurement, and outcome. In Berndt, T. J. & Ladd, G. W. (eds.), Peer relationships in child development. New York: Wiley. 15–45.Google Scholar
Buson, Laurence, & Billiez, Jacqueline. (2009). Stylistic repertoires and strategies of 10/11 year-old primary school children. Corela 7(2). Retrieved from http://corela.edel.univ-poitiers.fr/index.php?id=197. Accessed July 4, 2014.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. (2002). Dynamics of dialect convergence. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1):117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack K., Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie. (2002). The handbook of language variation and change. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. (1982). Linguistic variation and social function. In Romaine, S. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold. 153–166.Google Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre. (1991). La variation phonétique chez des enfants de 6 à 12 ans: Aspects développementaux et incidence des apprentissages alphabétiques. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Stendhal.Google Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, Beaud, Laurence, & Varga, Renata. (2000). Developmental data on a French sociolinguistic variable: The word-final post-consonantal /R/. Language Variation and Change 12(3):295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, & Foulkes, Paul. (2013). Introduction: Language acquisition and sociolinguistic variation. Linguistics 51(2):251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, Nardy, Aurélie, & Barbu, Stéphanie. (2011). Developmental dynamics of SES-related differences in children's production of obligatory and variable phonological alternations. Language Sciences 33(1):180–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulston, Rachel, Oviatt, Sharon, & Darves, Courtney. (2002). Amplitude convergence in children's conversational speech with animated personas. In Hansen, J. & Pellom, B. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Denver: Casual Productions. 2689–2692.Google Scholar
Cucchiarini, Catia. (1996). Assessing transcription agreement: Methodological aspects. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 10(2):131–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Campos, Manuel. (2004). Acquisition of sociolinguistic variables in Spanish: Do children acquire individual lexical forms or variable rules? In Face, T. (ed.), Laboratory approaches to Spanish phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 221–236.Google Scholar
Durand, Jacques, & Lyche, Chantal. (2008). French liaison in the light of corpus data. Journal of French Language Studies 18(1):33–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encrevé, Pierre. (1988). La liaison avec et sans enchaînement. Paris: Édition du Seuil.Google Scholar
Fischer, John L. (1958). Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14(1):47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, & Docherty, Gerard. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34(4):409–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerard, & Watt, Dominic. (2001). The emergence of structured variation. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 73:67–84.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerard, & Watt, Dominic. (2005). Phonological variation in child-directed speech. Language 81(1):177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, Simon, & Clark, Aileen. (1993). The development of dialogue co-ordination skills in schoolchildren. Language and Cognitive Processes 8:101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrod, Simon, & Pickering, Martin J. (2004). Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(1):8–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giles, Howard, & Powesland, Peter. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Peter. (1998). The truth-value judgment task. In McDaniel, D., Mckee, C. & Cairns, H. S. (eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press. 211–231.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haun, Daniel B. M., & Tomasello, Michaël (2011). Conformity to peer pressure in preschool children. Child Development 82(6):1759–1767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinde, Robert A., Titmus, Graham, Easton, Douglas, & Tamplin, Alison. (1985). Incidence of “friendship” and behavior toward strong associates versus nonassociates in preschoolers. Child Development 56:234–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinskens, Frans, Auer, Peter, & Kerswill, Paul. (2005). The study of dialect convergence and divergence: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In Auer, P., Hinskens, F., & Kerswill, P. (eds.), Dialect change: The convergence and divergence of dialects in contemporary societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–48.Google Scholar
Howard, Martin. (2006). Morpho-phonetic variation in the spoken French media: A comparison of three sociolinguistic variables. Estudios de Sociolinguistica 7(1):1–29.Google Scholar
Howes, Carollee. (1988). Peer interaction of young children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 53(1): serial 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howes, Carollee. (1996). The earliest frienships. In Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F., & Hartup, W. W. (eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 66–86.Google Scholar
Hruschka, Daniel J., Christiansen, Moretn H., Blythe, Richard A., Croft, William, Heggary, Paul, Mufwene, Salikoko S., Pierrehumbert, Janet B., & Poplack, Shana. (2009). Building social cognitive models of language change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(11):464–469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huttenlocher, Janellen, Vasilyeva, Marina, Cymerman, Elina, & Levine, Susan. (2002). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology 45(3):337–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hymel, Shelley. (1983). Preschool children's peer relations: Issues in sociometric assessment. Merrill-Palmer Quaterly 29(3):237–261.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE). (2012). Effectifs d'élèves et taux de scolarisation par âge dans le préélémentaire. Retrieved from http://www.insee.fr/fr/themes/tableau.asp?reg_id=0&ref_id=NATSOS07102. Accessed July 4, 2014.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques & Direction de l'Animation de la Recherche, des Études et des Statistiques (INSEE & DARES). (2003). Nomenclature des professions et catégories socioprofessionnelles des emplois salariés d'entreprise PCS - ESE 2003. Retrieved from http://www.insee.fr/fr/nom_def_met/nomenclatures/pcs/pages/Brochure_PCS_ESE_2003.pdf. Accessed July 4, 2014.Google Scholar
Justice, Laura M., Petscher, Yaacov, Schatschneider, Christopher & Mashburn, Andrew. (2011). Peer effects in preschool classrooms: Is children's language growth associated with their classmates' skills? Child Development 82(6):1768–1777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerswill, Paul. (1996). Children, adolescents, and language change. Language Variation and Change 8(2):177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, & Williams, Ann. (2000). Creating a new town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29(1):65–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, Robert M., & Pardo, Jennifer S. (2004). Is alignment always the result of automatic priming? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2):203–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labov, William. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1989). The child as linguistic historian. Language Variation and Change 1(1):85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (1994). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2001). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (2010). Principles of linguistic change. Vol. 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. (2012). What is to be learned? The community as the focus of social cognition. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10(2):265–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, Bernard. (1977). Contribution empirique à l'analyse socio-différentielle de la chute de /r/ dans les groupes consonantiques finals. Langue Française 34:109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, Bernard. (1980). Différenciation linguistique et différenciation sociale: Quelques problèmes de sociolinguistique française. Thèse de 3ème cycle de linguistique, Université de Paris VIII—Vincennes.Google Scholar
Le Page, Robert Brock, & Tabouret-Keller, Andrée. (1985). Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liégeois, Loïc, Saddour Inès, Chabanal, Damien, & Chanier, Thierry. (2013). Input characteristics and impact on the acquisition of phonological variables in French. Presented at the Child Language Seminar, June 24 and 25, Manchester. Retrieved from http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00850016/. Accessed July 4, 2014.Google Scholar
Malécot, André. (1975). French liaison as a function of grammatical, phonetic and paralinguistic variables. Phonetica 32:161–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Nathaël, Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, & Barbu, Stéphanie. (2010). Stylistic variations in the social network of a 10-year-old child: Pragmatic adjustments or automatic alignment? Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(5):678–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcdaniel, Dana, & Cairns, Helen Smith. (1998). Eliciting judgments of grammaticality and reference. In McDaniel, D., Mckee, C., & Cairns, H. S. (eds.), Methods for assessing children's syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press. 233–254.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. (1987). Language and social networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nardy, Aurélie. (2008). Acquisition des variables sociolinguistiques entre 2 et 6 ans: Facteurs sociologiques et influences des interactions au sein du réseau social. Ph.D. dissertation, Université Stendhal.Google Scholar
Nardy, Aurélie, Chevrot, Jean-Pierre, & Barbu, Stéphanie. (2013). The acquisition of sociolinguistic variation: Looking back and thinking ahead. Linguistics 51(2):255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Schieffelin, Bambi. (1995). The impact of language socialization on grammatical development. In Fletcher, P. & MacWhinney, B. (eds.), The handbook of child language. Oxford: Blackwell. 73–94.Google Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4):2382–2393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pardo, Jennifer S. (2012). Reflections on phonetic convergence: Speech perception does not mirror speech production. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(12):753–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, Jennifer S., Gibbons, Rachel, Suppes, Alexandra, & Krauss, Robert M. (2012). Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics 40:190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Arvilla C. (1976). The acquisition of the phonological system of a second dialect. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Julie. (1994). Acquisition of variable rules: (-t,d) deletion and (ing) production in preschool children. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Roberts, Julie. (1997). Acquisition of variable rules: A study of (-t, d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language 24(2):351–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. (1984). The language of children and adolescents: The acquisition of communicative competence. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Russell, Joan. (1982). Networks and sociolinguistic variation in an African urban setting. In Romaine, S. (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Edward Arnold. 125–140.Google Scholar
Santos, Antonio J., Vaughn, Brian E., & Bonnet, Jérôme. (2000). L'influence du réseau affiliatif sur la répartition de l'attention sociale chez l'enfant en groupe préscolaire. Revue des sciences de l'éducation 26(1):17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Antonio J., & Winegar, Lucien T. (1999). Child social ethology and peer relations: A developmental review of methodology and findings. Acta ethologica 2:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes, & Fortune, Liane. (2007). “Mam, my trousers is fa'in doon!”: Community, caregiver and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19(1):63–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes, & Richards, Hazel. (2013). The social and linguistic in the acquisition of sociolinguistic norms: Caregivers, children, and variation. Linguistics 51(2):285–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, Floyd F., & Gauthier, R. (1985). Concepts et méthodes. In Tremblay, R. E., Provost, M. A., & Strayer, F. F. (eds.), Éthologie et développement de l'enfant. Paris: Stock/Laurence Pernoud. 41–57.Google Scholar
Strayer, Floyd F., & Trudel, Marcel. (1985). L'éthologie sociale de l'enfant: choix des comportements, modes de relevés et démarches analytiques. Comportements 3:183–198.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Molfenter, Sonja. (2007). How'd you get that accent? Acquiring a second dialect of the same language. Language in Society 36(5):649–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar