Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:59:26.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantitative areal analysis of dialect features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

William A. Kretszchmar Jr
Affiliation:
University of Georgia

Abstract

Traditional notions of dialect are qualitative, and perceived dialects are difficult to reconcile with the evidence of actual production of dialect feature. Traditional dialect boundaries are similarly tied to qualitative judgements. More recently, various quantitative approaches have been attempted to try to capture dialect boundaries, each with its won problems. We have achieved some success with an objective quantitative analysis of separate dialect features from the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States (LAMSAS). Our findings suggest that a mathematical modeling of areal variation of dialect features, combined with a reassessment of traditional notions of dialect, could contribute to our knowledge of language, as well as document regional differences at the time of the LAMSAS survey.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babitch, Rose Mary, & LeBrun, Eric. (1989). Dialectometry as computerized agglomerative hierarchical classification analysis. In Schneider, Kretzschmar, & , Johnson (1989). 8390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. (1933). Language. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Carver, Craig. (1987). Americal regional English: A word geography. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Frederic, & Hall, Joan (eds.). (1985– ). Dictionary of American regional English. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J.K., & Trudgill, Peter. (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cichocki, Wladyslaw. (1989). An applicaion of dual scaling in dialectometry. In Schneider, Kretzschmar, & Johnson, (1989). 9196.Google Scholar
Cichocki, Wladyslaw, Babitch, Rose Mary, & Péronnet, Louise. (1993). Regional variation in Acadian french: Quantitative analysis of the maritime lexicon. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology,Victoria, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules, & Edmont, Edmond. (19021910). Atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Girard, Dennis, & Larmouth, Donald. (1993). Some applications of mathematical and statistical models in dialect geography. In Preston, Dennis (ed.), American dialect research. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 107131.Google Scholar
Goebl, H. (1992). Problèmes méthods de la dialectométrie actuelle. In Proceedings of the international congress on dialectology. Bilbo: Académie de la Langue Basque. 429473.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory. (1993). The quantitative analysis of linguistic variation. In Preston, Dennis (ed.), American dialect research. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 223249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houck, Charles L. (1969). A statistical and computerized methodology for analyzing dialect materials. Doctoral dissertation, University of lowa.Google Scholar
Inoue, Fumio, & Kasai, Kisako. (1989). Dialect classification by standard Japanese forms. In Mizutani, S. (ed.), Japanese quantitative linguistic. Bochum: Brockmeyer. 220235.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ellen, & Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (1993). Using linguistic atlas databases for phonetic analysis. Paper presented at joint meeting of Association for Computing in the Humanities/Association of Literary and Linguistic Computting,Washington.Google Scholar
Kelle, B. (1986). Die typologische raumgliderung von mundarten. Marburg.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (1992a). Interactive computer mapping for the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States (LAMSAS). In Doane, N., Hall, J., & Ringler, R. (eds.), Old English and new: Essays in language and linguistics in honor of Frederic G. Cassidy. New York: Garland. 400414.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (1992b). Isoglosses and predictive modeling. American Speech 67:227249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (1993). LAMSAS goes SASsy II: Another generation of statistical methods for regional analysis. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Methods in Dialectology,Victoria, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (1994). Dialectology and sociolinguistics: Same coin, different currency. Paper presented at NWAVE-XXIII.Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (1996). Foundations of American English. In Schneider, Edgar (ed.), Focus on USA. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (in press). Analytical procedure and three technical types of dialect. In Montgomery, Michael & Nunnally, Thomas (eds.), Linguistic studies from the Gulf States and beyond. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr, & Schneider, Edgar W. (in press). Introduction to quantitative analysis of linguistic survey data: An atlas by the numbers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr, Schneider, Edgar, & Johnson, Ellen (eds.). (1989). Computer methods in dialectology. Special issue of Journal of English Linguistics 22.Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. Jr, et al. (1993). Handbook of the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlatic States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. (1949). A word geography of the eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. (1972). Studies in area linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans, & McDavid, Raven I. Jr, (1961). The pronunciation of English in the Atlantic States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. (Reprint 1982, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press).Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans, et al. (19391943). Linguistic Atlas of New England. 3 vols. in 6. Providence: Brown University, for ACLS.Google Scholar
Lee, Jay, & Kretzschmar, William A. Jr (1993). Spatial analysis of linguistic data with GIS functions. International journal of Geographical Information Systems 7:541560.Google Scholar
LePage, Robert, & Tabouret-Keller, Andree. (1985). Acts of identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Linn, Michael, & Regal, Ronald (1985). Numerical texonomy as a tool in dialect research. In Warkentyne, H.J. (ed.), Papers from the fifth international conference of methods in dialectoloty. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria 245261.Google Scholar
Linn, Michael, & Regal, Ronald (1988). Verb analysis of the Linguistic Atlas of the North-Central States: A case study in preliminary analysis of a large data set. In Thomas, Alan (ed.), Methods in dialectology: Proceedings of the sixth international conference. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters. 138154.Google Scholar
Linn, Michael, & Regal, Ronald (1993). Missing data and computer mapping. In Viereck, W. (ed.), Verhandlungen des internationalen dialektologenkongresses Bamberg 1990: Volume 1. Stuttgart: Steiner. 253267.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Allen. (1993). The south in DARE. Paper presented at LAVIS II,Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
Moulton, William. (1962). Dialect geography and the concept of phonological space. Word 18:2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulton, William. (1968). Structural dialectology. Language 68:451466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. (1992). Why grammar should not be thought of as monolithic. In Larson, G. et al. , (eds.), The joy of grammar: A festscrift for James D. McCawley. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pederson, Lee. (19861992). Linguistic Atlas of the Gulf States. Athens: University of Georgia Press. (Volume 4, 1990, Regional matrix; Volume 6, 1991, Social matrix; Volume 7, 1992, Social pattern.)Google Scholar
Pederson, Lee. (1995). Elements of word geography. Journal of English Linguistics 23:3346.Google Scholar
Pop, Sever. (1960). La dialectologie. Louvain: Author.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Pascale, & Sankoff, David. (1978). Advances in variable rule methodology. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic. 5769.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David. (1990). Variable rules. In Rand, David & Sankoff, David, Gold Varb Version 2. Montreal: Center for Mathematical Research, University of Montreal. (Adapted from the articles as published in Ulrich Ammon et al. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1988.)Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, & Labov, William. (1979). On the uses of variable rules. Language in Society 8:189222.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de ([1916] 1966). Course in general linguistics. Ed. by Bally, Charles & Sechehaye, Albert, in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger. Trans. by Wade Baskin. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schiltz, Guillaume. (1993). Portable and reusable software for dialect surveys. Paper presented at the 8th International conference on Methods in Dialectology,Victoria, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. (1988). Qualitative vs. quantitative methods of area delimitation in dialectology: A comparison based on lexical data from Georgia and Alabama. Journal of English Linguistics 21:175212.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. (1984). On dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Viereck, Wolfgang. (1985). Linguistic atlases and dialectometry. In Kirk, John et al. (eds.), Studies in linguistic geography. London: Croom Helm. 94112.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. (1954). Is structural dialectology possible? Word 10:388400. (Reprinted in Harold Allen & Michael Linn (eds.), Dialect and language variation. Orlando, FL: Academic, 1986. 20–34).Google Scholar
Wenker, Georg, & Wrede, Ferdinand. (1895). Der sprachatlas des deutschen reichs. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar