Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:21:30.004Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selected poster presentations from the American Association of Applied Linguistics conference, Denver, USA, March 2020

‘They're participating way more’: The impact of ESL and content teachers’ collaboration on students’ participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2020

Amanda Giles
Amanda Giles*
Affiliation:
Birmingham-Southern College, Alabama, USA
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research in Progress
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , October 2020 , pp. 529 - 532
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed Hersi, A., Horan, D. A., & Lewis, M. A. (2016). Redefining ‘community’ through collaboration and co-teaching: A case study of an ESOL specialist, a literacy specialist, and a fifth- grade teacher. Teachers and Teaching, 22(8), 927–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide to qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
DelliCarpini, M. (2018). Administrative issues in collaborative teaching. In Liontas, J., DelliCarpini, M., Park, G., & Salas, S. (Eds.), TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–9). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dove, M., & Honigsfeld, A. (2018). Co-teaching for English learners: A guide to collaborative planning, assessment, and reflection. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
Duff, P. (2001). Language, literacy, content, and (pop) culture: Challenges for ESL students in mainstream courses. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(1), 103–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, A. (2018). Navigating the contradictions: An ESL teacher's professional self-development. TESL Canada Journal, 35(2), 104–127.Google Scholar
Giles, A. (2019). The influences of ESL and content teachers’ collaboration on teachers’ learning and ESL students’ participation: A case study of middle school mainstream classrooms. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Giles, A., & Yazan, B. (2020). ‘You're not an island’: A language arts teacher's changed perceptions in ESL and content teachers’ collaboration. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 43(3), 1–15.Google Scholar
Harklau, L. (2000). From the ’good kids’ to the ‘worst’: Representations of English language learners across educational settings. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 35–67.Google Scholar
Kayi-Aydar, H. (2014). Social positioning, participation, and second language learning: Talkative students in an academic ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 686–714.Google Scholar
Kibler, A. K., Walqui, A., & Bunch, G. C. (2015). Transformational opportunities: Language and literacy instruction for English language learners in the Common Core era in the United States. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 9–35.Google Scholar
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (2000). The helping behaviors of fifth graders while using collaborative strategic reading during ESL content classes. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 69–98.Google Scholar
Martin-Beltrán, M. (2010). Positioning proficiency: How students and teachers (de)construct language proficiency at school. Linguistics and Education, 21(4), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. M. (2000). Language use, identity, and social interaction: Migrant students in Australia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(1), 69–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappamihiel, N. E. (2002). English as a second language students and English language anxiety: Issues in the mainstream classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 36, 327–355.Google Scholar
Peercy, M. M., Ditter, M., & DeStefano, M. (2016). ‘We need more consistency’: Negotiating the division of labor in ESOL–mainstream teacher collaboration. TESOL Journal, 8(1), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peercy, M. M., Martin-Beltrán, M., Yazan, B., & DeStefano, M. (2017). “Jump in any time”: How teacher struggle with curricular reform generates opportunities for teacher learning. Action in Teacher Education, 39(2), 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yoon, B. (2008). Uninvited guests: The influence of teachers’ roles and pedagogies on the positioning of English language learners in the regular classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 495–522.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Giles supplementary material

Giles supplementary material

Download Giles supplementary material(Image)
Image 2.5 MB