Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:50:30.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Language testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2006

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

06–103Gamliel, Eyal (Ruppin Academic Center, Israel) & Liema Davidovitz, Online versus traditional teaching evaluation: Mode can matter. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Routledge/Taylor&Francis) 30.6 (2005), 581–592.

06–104Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria & Paul Meara (U Wales, UK), Examiner support strategies and test-taker vocabulary. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (Mouton de Gruyter) 43.3 (2005), 239–258.

06–105Luce-Kapler, Rebecca & Don Klinger (Queen's U, Kingston, Canada; [email protected]). Uneasy writing: The defining moments of high-stakes literacy testing. Assessing Writing (Elsevier) 10.3 (2005), 157–173.

06–106McClure, James E. (Ball State U, USA) & Lee C. Spector,Plus/minusgrading and motivation: An empirical study of student choice and performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Routledge/Taylor&Francis) 30.6 (2005), 571–579.

06–107Ricketts, Chris (U Portsmouth, UK) & Stan Zakrzewski, A risk-analysis approach to implementing web-based assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (Routledge/Taylor&Francis) 30.6 (2005), 603–620.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press